Clinical outcomes and predictors of complications in patients undergoing leadless pacemaker implantation.


Journal

Heart rhythm
ISSN: 1556-3871
Titre abrégé: Heart Rhythm
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101200317

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2022
Historique:
received: 23 12 2021
revised: 15 03 2022
accepted: 16 03 2022
pubmed: 2 5 2022
medline: 27 7 2022
entrez: 1 5 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Leadless pacemakers have emerged as a viable alternative for traditional transvenous pacemakers to reduce the risk of device-related complications. The purpose of this study was to examine the real-world clinical outcomes and complications associated with the implantation of leadless pacemaker devices. Using the National Readmission Database (NRD), we examined patient demographics, and in-hospital and 30-day procedural outcomes after leadless pacemaker implantation from 2016-2018. Our cohort comprised adults (≥18 years) with an ICD-10 procedural code for leadless pacemaker implantation. Our cohort included a total of 7821 patients who underwent leadless pacemaker implantation. Overall immediate procedure-related complications, as defined broadly in this study, occurred in 7.5% of patients. Pericardial effusion without the need for pericardiocentesis occurred in 1.9% of patients, with pericardiocentesis performed in 1.0%. Vascular complications occurred in 2.3% of patients; 0.33% required repair, and device dislodgment occurred in 0.51%. The most significant predictor for procedural complications was end-stage renal disease (odds ratio [OR] 1.65; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17-2.32; P = .004), congestive heart failure (OR 1.28; 95% CI 1.01-1.62; P = .04), and coagulopathy (OR 1.77; 95% CI 1.34-2.34; P <.001). All-cause readmission occurred in 17.9% of patients within 30 days from device implant, with 1.36% of readmissions being procedure related. At 30 days postimplant and after discharge, 0.25% of patients needed a new pacemaker, and 0.18% had pericardial complications. In our large real-life cohort, we found the rate of serious complications after leadless pacemaker implantation to be relatively low and comparable to prior studies in a high-risk population with multiple comorbid conditions.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Leadless pacemakers have emerged as a viable alternative for traditional transvenous pacemakers to reduce the risk of device-related complications.
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to examine the real-world clinical outcomes and complications associated with the implantation of leadless pacemaker devices.
METHODS
Using the National Readmission Database (NRD), we examined patient demographics, and in-hospital and 30-day procedural outcomes after leadless pacemaker implantation from 2016-2018. Our cohort comprised adults (≥18 years) with an ICD-10 procedural code for leadless pacemaker implantation.
RESULTS
Our cohort included a total of 7821 patients who underwent leadless pacemaker implantation. Overall immediate procedure-related complications, as defined broadly in this study, occurred in 7.5% of patients. Pericardial effusion without the need for pericardiocentesis occurred in 1.9% of patients, with pericardiocentesis performed in 1.0%. Vascular complications occurred in 2.3% of patients; 0.33% required repair, and device dislodgment occurred in 0.51%. The most significant predictor for procedural complications was end-stage renal disease (odds ratio [OR] 1.65; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17-2.32; P = .004), congestive heart failure (OR 1.28; 95% CI 1.01-1.62; P = .04), and coagulopathy (OR 1.77; 95% CI 1.34-2.34; P <.001). All-cause readmission occurred in 17.9% of patients within 30 days from device implant, with 1.36% of readmissions being procedure related. At 30 days postimplant and after discharge, 0.25% of patients needed a new pacemaker, and 0.18% had pericardial complications.
CONCLUSION
In our large real-life cohort, we found the rate of serious complications after leadless pacemaker implantation to be relatively low and comparable to prior studies in a high-risk population with multiple comorbid conditions.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35490710
pii: S1547-5271(22)01870-7
doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.03.1226
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1289-1296

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Faris Haddadin (F)

Section of Cardiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.

Monil Majmundar (M)

Department of Cardiology, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York; Section of Cardiovascular Research, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Department, Cleveland Clinic, Akron, Ohio.

Ahmad Jabri (A)

Heart and Vascular Center, Case Western Reserve University/MetroHealth Medical Center, Ohio.

Luke Pecha (L)

Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.

Claire Scott (C)

Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.

Marilyne Daher (M)

Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.

Ashish Kumar (A)

Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Akron General, Akron, Ohio.

Ankur Kalra (A)

Department of Cardiovascular Research, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Department, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Rand Fram (R)

Faculty of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.

Farah Haddadin (F)

Faculty of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.

Soufian Almahameed (S)

Heart and Vascular Center, Case Western Reserve University/MetroHealth Medical Center, Ohio.

Christopher V DeSimone (CV)

Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

Yong-Mei Cha (YM)

Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

Siva K Mulpuru (SK)

Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

Kenneth A Ellenbogen (KA)

Division of Cardiology, VCU School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia.

Mohammad Saeed (M)

Department of Cardiology, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Texas; Section of Cardiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.

Mihail G Chelu (MG)

Department of Cardiology, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Texas; Section of Cardiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.

Abhishek J Deshmukh (AJ)

Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. Electronic address: deshmukh.abhishek@mayo.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH