Room4Birth - The effect of giving birth in a hospital birthing room designed with person-centred considerations: A Swedish randomised controlled trial.

Birth environment Birth room design Childbirth Nulliparous Randomised controlled trial

Journal

Sexual & reproductive healthcare : official journal of the Swedish Association of Midwives
ISSN: 1877-5764
Titre abrégé: Sex Reprod Healthc
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101530546

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2022
Historique:
received: 18 12 2021
revised: 18 04 2022
accepted: 20 04 2022
pubmed: 3 5 2022
medline: 9 6 2022
entrez: 2 5 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To evaluate if a birthing room designed with person-centred considerations improves labour and birth outcomes for nulliparous women when compared to regular birthing rooms. A randomised controlled trial was conducted at a Swedish labour ward between January 2019 and October 2020. Nulliparous women in spontaneous labour were randomised either to a birthing room designed with person-centred considerations (New room) or a Regular room. The primary outcome was a composite of four variables: vaginal non-instrumental birth; no oxytocin augmentation; postpartum blood loss < 1000 ml; and a positive childbirth experience. To detect a difference of 8% between the groups, 1274 study participants were needed, but the trial was terminated early due to consequences of the Covid-19 pandemic. A total of 406 women were randomised; 204 to the New room and 202 to the Regular room. There was no significant difference in the primary outcome between the groups (42.2% versus 35.1%; odds ratio: 1.35, 95% Confidence Interval 0.90-2.01; p = 0.18). Participants in the New room used epidural analgesia to a lower extent (54.4% versus 65.3%, relative risk: 0.83, 95% Confidence Interval 0.71-0.98; p = 0.03) and reported to a higher degree that the room contributed to a sense of safety, control, and integrity (p=<0.001). The hypothesis that the New room would improve the primary outcome could not be verified. Considering the early discontinuation of the study, results should be interpreted with caution. Nevertheless, analyses of our secondary outcomes emphasise the experiential value of the built birth environment in improving care for labouring women.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35500476
pii: S1877-5756(22)00037-4
doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2022.100731
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

100731

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Lisa Goldkuhl (L)

Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Arvid Wallgrens backe, Box 457, 405 30, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Diagnosvagen 11, 41685 Gothenburg, Region Västra Götaland, Sweden. Electronic address: lisa.goldkuhl@gu.se.

Hanna Gyllensten (H)

Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Arvid Wallgrens backe, Box 457, 405 30, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; University of Gothenburg Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Cecily Begley (C)

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin, College Green, Dublin 2, Ireland.

Helle Wijk (H)

Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Arvid Wallgrens backe, Box 457, 405 30, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Quality Assurance and Patient Safety, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Blå stråket 5, 413 45, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden; Centre for Healthcare Architecture (CVA), Chalmers University of Technology, Chalmersplatsen 4, 412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Building Design, Chalmers University of Technology, Chalmersplatsen 4, 412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden.

Christina Nilsson (C)

Munkebäck Antenatal Clinic, Munkebäckstorg 6, 416 73 Gothenburg, Region Västra Götaland, Sweden.

Göran Lindahl (G)

Centre for Healthcare Architecture (CVA), Chalmers University of Technology, Chalmersplatsen 4, 412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Building Design, Chalmers University of Technology, Chalmersplatsen 4, 412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden.

Anna-Karin Ringqvist (AK)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Diagnosvagen 11, 41685 Gothenburg, Region Västra Götaland, Sweden.

Kerstin Uvnäs-Moberg (K)

University of Agriculture (SLU), Almas Allé 8, 750 07, Uppsala University, Sweden.

Marie Berg (M)

Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Arvid Wallgrens backe, Box 457, 405 30, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Diagnosvagen 11, 41685 Gothenburg, Region Västra Götaland, Sweden; Faculty of Medicine and Community Health, Evangelical University of Africa, Bukavu, Democratic Republic of the Congo, The.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH