ERas and COLorectal endoscopic surgery: an Italian society for endoscopic surgery and new technologies (SICE) national report.


Journal

Surgical endoscopy
ISSN: 1432-2218
Titre abrégé: Surg Endosc
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8806653

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2022
Historique:
received: 23 08 2021
accepted: 29 01 2022
pubmed: 3 5 2022
medline: 23 9 2022
entrez: 2 5 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Several reports demonstrated a strong association between the level of adherence to the protocol and improved clinical outcomes after surgery. However, it is difficult to obtain full adherence to the protocol into clinical practice and has still not been identified the threshold beyond which improved functional results can be reached. The ERCOLE (ERas and COLorectal Endoscopic surgery) study was as a cohort, prospective, multi-centre national study evaluating the association between adherence to ERAS items and clinical outcomes after minimally invasive colorectal surgery. The primary endpoint was to associate the percentage of ERAS adherence to functional recovery after minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery. The secondary endpoints of the study was to validate safety of the ERAS programme evaluating complications' occurrence according to Clavien-Dindo classification and to evaluate the compliance of the Italian surgeons to each ERAS item. 1138 patients were included. Adherence to the ERAS protocol was full only in 101 patients (8.9%), > 75% of the ERAS items in 736 (64.7%) and > 50% in 1127 (99%). Adherence to > 75% was associated with a better functional recovery with 90.2 ± 98.8 vs 95.9 ± 33.4 h (p = 0.003). At difference, full adherence to the ERAS components 91.7 ± 22.1 vs 92.2 ± 31.6 h (p = 0.8) was not associated with better recovery. Our results were encouraging to affirm that adherence to the ERAS program up to 75% could be considered satisfactory to get the goal. Our study could be considered a call to simplify the ERAS protocol facilitating its penetrance into clinical practice.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Several reports demonstrated a strong association between the level of adherence to the protocol and improved clinical outcomes after surgery. However, it is difficult to obtain full adherence to the protocol into clinical practice and has still not been identified the threshold beyond which improved functional results can be reached.
METHODS
The ERCOLE (ERas and COLorectal Endoscopic surgery) study was as a cohort, prospective, multi-centre national study evaluating the association between adherence to ERAS items and clinical outcomes after minimally invasive colorectal surgery. The primary endpoint was to associate the percentage of ERAS adherence to functional recovery after minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery. The secondary endpoints of the study was to validate safety of the ERAS programme evaluating complications' occurrence according to Clavien-Dindo classification and to evaluate the compliance of the Italian surgeons to each ERAS item.
RESULTS
1138 patients were included. Adherence to the ERAS protocol was full only in 101 patients (8.9%), > 75% of the ERAS items in 736 (64.7%) and > 50% in 1127 (99%). Adherence to > 75% was associated with a better functional recovery with 90.2 ± 98.8 vs 95.9 ± 33.4 h (p = 0.003). At difference, full adherence to the ERAS components 91.7 ± 22.1 vs 92.2 ± 31.6 h (p = 0.8) was not associated with better recovery.
CONCLUSIONS
Our results were encouraging to affirm that adherence to the ERAS program up to 75% could be considered satisfactory to get the goal. Our study could be considered a call to simplify the ERAS protocol facilitating its penetrance into clinical practice.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35501602
doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09212-y
pii: 10.1007/s00464-022-09212-y
pmc: PMC9485180
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

7619-7627

Investigateurs

Ferdinando Agresta (F)
Francesco Pizza (F)
Dario D'Antonio (D)
Francesco Amalfitano (F)
Francesco Selvaggi (F)
Guido Sciaudone (G)
Lucio Selvaggi (L)
Daniela Prando (D)
Fabio Cavallo (F)
Mario Guerrieri (M)
Monica Ortenzi (M)
Giovanni Lezoche (G)
Diego Cuccurullo (D)
Ernesto Tartaglia (E)
Carlo Sagnelli (C)
Andrea Coratti (A)
Angela Tribuzi (A)
Michele Di Marino (M)
Gabriele Anania (G)
Cristina Bombardini (C)
Mauro Pietro Zago (MP)
Fulvio Tagliabue (F)
Morena Burati (M)
Salomone Di Saverio (S)
Samuele Colombo (S)
Sara El Adla (SE)
Maurizio De Luca (M)
Monica Zese (M)
Dario Parini (D)
Paolo Prosperi (P)
Giovanni Alemanno (G)
Jacopo Martellucci (J)
Stefano Olmi (S)
Alberto Oldani (A)
Matteo Uccelli (M)
Dario Bono (D)
Donatella Scaglione (D)
Roberto Saracco (R)
Mauro Podda (M)
Adolfo Pisanu (A)
Valentina Murzi (V)
Antonino Agrusa (A)
Salvatore Buscemi (S)
Irnerio Angelo Muttillo (IA)
Biagio Picardi (B)
Edoardo Maria Muttillo (EM)
Leonardo Solaini (L)
Davide Cavaliere (D)
Giorgio Ercolani (G)
Francesco Corcione (F)
Roberto Peltrini (R)
Umberto Bracale (U)
Andrea Lucchi (A)
Laura Vittori (L)
Michele Grassia (M)
Alberto Porcu (A)
Teresa Perra (T)
Claudio Feo (C)
Pierluigi Angelini (P)
Domenico Izzo (D)
Luigi Ricciardelli (L)
Mario Trompetto (M)
Gaetano Gallo (G)
Alberto Realis Luc (AR)
Andrea Muratore (A)
Marcello Calabrò (M)
Bruno Cuzzola (B)
Andrea Barberis (A)
Federico Costanzo (F)
Giulio Angelini (G)
Graziano Ceccarelli (G)
Fabio Rondelli (F)
Michele De Rosa (M)
Elisa Cassinotti (E)
Luigi Boni (L)
Ludovica Baldari (L)
Paolo Pietro Bianchi (PP)
Giampaolo Formisano (G)
Giuseppe Giuliani (G)
Andrea Alessandro Pisani Ceretti (AAP)
Nicolò Maria Mariani (NM)
Marco Giovenzana (M)
Roberto Farfaglia (R)
Paolo Marcianò (P)
Valeria Arizzi (V)
Micaela Piccoli (M)
Francesca Pecchini (F)
Gianmaria Casoni Pattacini (GC)
Emanuele Botteri (E)
Nereo Vettoretto (N)
Claudio Guarnieri (C)
Letizia Laface (L)
Emmanuele Abate (E)
Massimiliano Casati (M)
Carlo Feo (C)
Nicolò Fabri (N)
Antonio Pesce (A)
Piero Maida (P)
Giampaolo Marte (G)
Roberta Abete (R)
Lorenzo Casali (L)
Alessandro Marchignoli (A)
Matteo Dall'Aglio (M)
Stefano Scabini (S)
Davide Pertile (D)
Alessandra Aprile (A)
Jacopo Andreuccetti (J)
Alberto Di Leo (A)
Lorenzo Crepaz (L)
Francesco Maione (F)
Sara Vertaldi (S)
Alessia Chini (A)
Riccardo Rosati (R)
Francesco Puccetti (F)
Giulia Maggi (G)
Andrea Cossu (A)
Alberto Sartori (A)
Maurizio De Luca (M)
Giacomo Piatto (G)
Nicola Perrotta (N)
Marta Celiento (M)
Marco Scorzelli (M)
Vincenzo Pilone (V)
Salvatore Tramontano (S)
Pietro Calabrese (P)
Raffaele Sechi (R)
Nicola Cillara (N)
Giaime Putzu (G)
Michele Guido Podda (MG)
Mauro Montuori (M)
Enrico Pinotti (E)
Giuseppe Sica (G)
Marzia Franceschilli (M)
Bruno Sensi (B)
Maurizio Degiuli (M)
Rossella Reddavid (R)
Lucia Puca (L)
Marco Farsi (M)
Alessio Minuzzo (A)
Elena Gia (E)
Gian Luca Baiocchi (GL)
Valerio Ranieri (V)
Andrea Celotti (A)
Francesco Bianco (F)
Sebastiano Grassia (S)
Alessandra Novi (A)

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s).

Références

Nygren J, Thacker J, Carli F, Fearon KCH, Norderval S, Lobo DN, Ljungqvist O, Soop M, Ramirez J (2013) Guidelines for perioperative care in elective rectal/pelvic surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) society recommendations. World J Surg 37:285–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1787-6
doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1787-6 pubmed: 23052796
Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W, Demartines N, Roulin D, Francis N, McNaught CE, MacFie J, Liberman AS, Soop M, Hill A, Kennedy RH, Lobo DN, Fearon K, Ljungqvist O (2013) Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) society recommendations. World J Surg 37:259–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1772-0
doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1772-0 pubmed: 23052794
Vignali A, Elmore U, Guarneri G, De Ruvo V, Parise P, Rosati R (2021) Enhanced recovery after surgery in colon and rectal surgery: identification of predictive variables of failure in a monocentric series including 733 patients. Updates Surg 73(1):111–121
doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00848-w
Bakker N, Cakir H, Doodeman HJ, Houdijk APJ (2015) Eight years of experience with enhanced recovery after surgery in patients with colon cancer: impact of measures to improve adherence. Surgery 157:1130–1136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2015.01.016
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.01.016 pubmed: 25791027
Maessen J, Dejong CHC, Hausel J, Nygren J, Lassen K, Andersen J, Kessels AGH, Revhaug A, Kehlet H, Ljungqvist O, Fearon KCH, Von Meyenfeldt MF (2007) A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection. Br J Surg 94:224–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5468
doi: 10.1002/bjs.5468 pubmed: 17205493
Messenger DE, Curtis NJ, Jones A, Jones EL, Smart NJ, Francis NK (2017) Factors predicting outcome from enhanced recovery programmes in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 31(5):2050–2071
doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5205-2
Roulin D, Muradbegovic M, Addor V, Blanc C, Demartines N, Hübner M (2017) Enhanced recovery after elective colorectal surgery - reasons for non-compliance with the protocol. Dig Surg 34(3):220–226
doi: 10.1159/000450685
Wind J, Polle SW, Fung Kon Jin PH, Dejong CH, von Meyenfeldt MF, Ubbink DT, Gouma DJ, Bemelman WA; Laparoscopy and/or Fast Track Multimodal Management Versus Standard Care (LAFA) Study Group; Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Group (2006) Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery. Br J Surg 93:800–809
doi: 10.1002/bjs.5384
Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W, Demartines N, Roulin D, Francis N, McNaught CE, MacFie J, Liberman AS, Soop M, Hill A, Kennedy RH, Lobo DN, Fearon K, Ljungqvist O (2012) Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Society: Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS ®) society recommendations. Clin Nutr 31:783–800
doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.08.013
Nygren J, Thacker J, Carli F, Fearon KC, Norderval S, Lobo DN, Ljungqvist O, Soop M, Ramirez J (2012) Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Society: Guidelines for perioperative care in elective rectal/pelvic surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS ®) society recommendations. Clin Nutr 31:801–816
doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.08.012
Catarci M, Benedetti M, Maurizi A, Spinelli F, Bernacconi T, Guercioni G, Campagnacci R (2021) ERAS pathway in colorectal surgery: structured implementation program and high adherence for improved outcomes. Updates Surg 73(1):123–137
doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00885-5
Ren L, Zhu D, Wei Y, Pan X, Liang L, Xu J, Zhong Y, Xue Z, Jin L, Zhan S, Niu W, Qin X, Wu Z, Wu Z (2012) Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program attenuates stress and accelerates recovery in patients after radical resection for colorectal cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial. World J Surg 36:407–414
doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1348-4
Eskicioglu C, Forbes SS, Aarts MA, Okrainec A, McLeod RS (2009) Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs for patients having colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Gastrointest Surg 13:2321–2329
doi: 10.1007/s11605-009-0927-2
Spanjersberg WR, Reurings J, Keus F, van Laarhoven CJ (2011) Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007635.pub2
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007635.pub2 pubmed: 21328298
Greco M, Capretti G, Beretta L, Gemma M, Pecorelli N, Braga M (2014) Enhanced recovery program in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg 38:1531–1541
doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2416-8
Kahokehr A, Robertson P, Sammour T, Soop M, Hill AG (2011) Perioperative care: a survey of New Zealand and Australian colorectal surgeons. Colorectal Dis 13:1308–1313
doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02453.x
Arsalani-Zadeh R, Ullah S, Khan S, Macfe J (2010) Current pattern of perioperative practice in elective colorectal surgery; a questionnaire survey of ACPGBI members. Int J Surg 8:294–298
doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.01.014
Ahmed J, Khan S, Lim M, Chandrasekaran TV, Macfe J (2012) Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols-compliance and variations in practice during routine colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 14:1045–1051
doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02856.x
Maessen J, Dejong CH, Hausel J, Nygren J, Lassen K, Andersen J, Kessels AG, Revhaug A, Kehlet H, Ljungqvist O, Fearon KC, von Meyenfeldt MF (2007) A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery program for colorectal resection. Br J Surg 94:224–231
doi: 10.1002/bjs.5468
Nygren J, Hausel J, Kehlet H, Revhaug A, Lassen K, Dejong C, Andersen J, von Meyenfeldt M, Ljungqvist O, Fearon KC (2005) A comparison in fve European Centers of case mix, clinical management and outcomes following either conventional or fast-track perioperative care in colorectal surgery. Clin Nutr 24:455–461
doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2005.02.003
Lassen K, Hannemann P, Ljungqvist O, Fearon K, Dejong CH, von Meyenfeldt MF, Hausel J, Nygren J, Andersen J, Revhaug A, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Group (2005) Patterns in current perioperative practice: survey of colorectal surgeons in fve northern European countries. BMJ 330:1420–1421
doi: 10.1136/bmj.38478.568067.AE
Gustafsson UO, Hausel J, Thorell A, Ljungqvist O, Soop M, Nygren J (2011) Adherence to the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol and outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery. Arch Surg 146(5):571–577
doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.309
Boulind CE, Yeo M, Burkill C, Witt A, James E, Ewings P et al (2012) Factors predicting deviation from an enhanced recovery programme and delayed discharge after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 14(3):e103–e110
doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02799.x
ERAS Compliance Group (2015) The impact of enhanced recovery protocol compliance on elective colorectal cancer resection: results from an international registry. Ann Surg 261(6):1153–1159
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001029
Lloyd GM, Kirby R, Hemingway DM, Keane FB, Miller AS, Neary P (2010) The RAPID protocol enhances patient recovery after both laparoscopic and open colorectal resections. Surg Endosc 24(6):1434–1439
doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0795-6
Jurt J, Slieker J, Frauche P, Addor V, Solà J, Demartines N, Hübner M (2017) Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: Can We Rely on the Key Factors or Do We Need the Bel Ensemble? World J Surg 41(10):2464–2470
doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4054-z

Auteurs

Marco Milone (M)

Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II" University of Naples, via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy. milone.marco.md@gmail.com.

Ugo Elmore (U)

Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.

Michele Manigrasso (M)

Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, "Federico II" University of Naples, via Pansini 5, Naples, Italy.

Monica Ortenzi (M)

Department of General Surgery, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Piazza Roma 22, 60121, Ancona, Italy.

Emanuele Botteri (E)

General Surgery, ASST Spedali Civili Di Brescia, Montichiari, Italy.

Alberto Arezzo (A)

Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Turin, Italy.

Gianfranco Silecchia (G)

Department of Medical Surgical Science and Biotechnologies, Faculty Pharmacy and Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Mario Guerrieri (M)

Department of General Surgery, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Piazza Roma 22, 60121, Ancona, Italy.

Giovanni Domenico De Palma (GD)

Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II" University of Naples, via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.

Ferdinando Agresta (F)

Department of General Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Ulss2 Marca Trevigiana, Vittorio Veneto, TV, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH