How podcasts teach: A comprehensive analysis of the didactic methods of the top hundred medical podcasts.

curriculum infrastructure e-Learning/computers independent medical education research

Journal

Medical teacher
ISSN: 1466-187X
Titre abrégé: Med Teach
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7909593

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 2022
Historique:
pubmed: 10 5 2022
medline: 12 10 2022
entrez: 9 5 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Medical podcasts have grown in popularity, but little is known about their didactic methods. This study sought to systemically describe the pedagogical approach employed by the 100 most popular medical podcasts in the United States. This study also aimed to assess factors related to quality control and conflicts of interest in podcasting. The authors averaged the rank positions for Apple podcasts in the Medicine category in the United States from 06/01/18 to 09/30/20 to generate a list of the 100 highest-ranked medical podcasts. They developed and validated a categorization system of didactic methods based on Bloom's taxonomy and collected data on didactic methods, as well as podcast affiliation, target audience, format, advertising, continuing medical education (CME) offerings, and presence of a reference list or review process. Of the 100 most popular medical podcasts, 91 are educational. Of those, 51 are podcasts intended for physician education (PIPEs) while 40 are intended for other audiences, including the general public, nurses, and physical therapists. Compared with podcasts intended for other audiences, PIPEs engage higher levels of Bloom's taxonomy ( Medical podcasts employ a variety of didactic methods, including those ranked highly on Bloom's taxonomy. Unlike traditional medical education, PIPEs are commonly produced by individuals or companies and targeted to all levels of medical learners.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35531609
doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2071691
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1146-1150

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Auteurs

Ellen Zhang (E)

Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Nicolas Trad (N)

Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Robert Corty (R)

Department of Internal Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Dave Zohrob (D)

Chartable, New York, NY, USA.

Shreya Trivedi (S)

Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Innovations in Media and Education Delivery (iMED) Initiative, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.

Adam Rodman (A)

Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Innovations in Media and Education Delivery (iMED) Initiative, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH