Multiple colony antifungal susceptibility testing detects polyresistance in clinical Candida cultures: a European Confederation of Medical Mycology excellence centers study.
Antifungal resistance
Antifungal susceptibility testing
Candida
Multiple colony testing
Polyresistance
Journal
Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
ISSN: 1469-0691
Titre abrégé: Clin Microbiol Infect
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9516420
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2022
Sep 2022
Historique:
received:
07
02
2022
revised:
13
04
2022
accepted:
16
04
2022
pubmed:
11
5
2022
medline:
20
9
2022
entrez:
10
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Many factors influence the outcome of in vitro antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST), including endpoint definition, inoculum sizes, time and temperature of incubation, and growth medium used. This European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM) Excellence center driven study investigated multiple colony testing (MCT) of five separate colonies to investigate the prevalence of polyresistance (PR), defined as heterogeneous MICs from a same-species Candida culture irrespective of the underlying resistance mechanism. Candida spp. MCT for fluconazole and anidulafungin was performed by Etest prospectively comprising 405 clinical samples. MCT results were compared to the real-life routine MIC data and PR was assessed. Candida colonies displaying strong PR were selected for genotyping using multilocus sequence typing and random amplified polymorphic DNA assays for C. lusitaniae. Candida PR was observed in 33 of 405 samples (8.1%), with higher rates for non-albicans species (26/186, 14%) than for C. albicans (7/219, 3.2%), and for fluconazole than for anidulafungin. MCT detected acquired resistance more often than routine AFST (18/405, 4.5%) and 9 of the 161 investigated blood cultures showed PR (5.6%). Multilocus sequence typing and random amplified polymorphic DNA did not reveal a uniform genetic correlate in strains studied. This study shows that Candida single MIC-values obtained in routine diagnostics may be incidental, as they fail to detect PR and resistant subpopulations reliably. The reasons for PR seem to be manifold and should be regarded as a phenotypical expression of genomic variability irrespective of the underlying resistance mechanism, which may help to interpret ambiguous and non-reproducible AFST results.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35537592
pii: S1198-743X(22)00222-1
doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.04.014
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antifungal Agents
0
Fluconazole
8VZV102JFY
Anidulafungin
9HLM53094I
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1288.e1-1288.e7Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd.