How national leaders keep 'us' safe: A longitudinal, four-nation study exploring the role of identity leadership as a predictor of adherence to COVID-19 non-pharmaceutical interventions.
COVID-19
Health policy
Public health
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 05 2022
10 05 2022
Historique:
entrez:
10
5
2022
pubmed:
11
5
2022
medline:
14
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To investigate whether citizens' adherence to health-protective non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) during the COVID-19 pandemic is predicted by identity leadership, wherein leaders are perceived to create a sense of shared national identity. Observational two-wave study. Hypotheses testing was conducted with structural equation modelling. Data collection during the COVID-19 pandemic in China, Germany, Israel and the USA in April/May 2020 and four weeks later. Adults in China (n=548, 66.6% women), Germany (n=182, 78% women), Israel (n=198, 51.0% women) and the USA (n=108, 58.3% women). Identity leadership (assessed by the four-item Identity Leadership Inventory Short-Form) at Time 1, perceived shared national identification (PSNI; assessed with four items) and adherence to health-protective NPIs (assessed with 10 items that describe different health-protective interventions; for example, wearing face masks) at Time 2. Identity leadership was positively associated with PSNI (95% CI 0.11 to 0.30, p<0.001) in all countries. This, in turn, was related to more adherence to health-protective NPIs in all countries (95% CI 0.03 to 0.36, 0.001≤ National leaders can make a difference by promoting a sense of shared identity among their citizens because people are more inclined to follow health-protective NPIs to the extent that they feel part of a united 'us'. However, the content of identity leadership (perceptions of what it means to be a nation's citizen) is essential, because this can also encourage people to disregard such recommendations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35537783
pii: bmjopen-2021-054980
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054980
pmc: PMC9091491
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e054980Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Psychol Sci. 2007 Mar;18(3):233-9
pubmed: 17444920
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jun 8;118(23):
pubmed: 34016707
Sci Rep. 2021 May 19;11(1):10605
pubmed: 34012040
BMJ. 2013 Feb 26;346:f653
pubmed: 23444424
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 May 28;6(2):e19862
pubmed: 32434145
Soc Issues Policy Rev. 2021 Jan;15(1):35-83
pubmed: 33821168
Int J Intercult Relat. 2021 Mar;81:1-8
pubmed: 33518841
Nat Commun. 2022 Jan 26;13(1):517
pubmed: 35082277
Eur J Epidemiol. 2020 May;35(5):389-399
pubmed: 32430840
BMJ. 2020 Apr 24;369:m1643
pubmed: 32332028
Eur J Pers. 2020 Jul 08;:
pubmed: 32836766
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 May;4(5):460-471
pubmed: 32355299
Infect Dis Model. 2020 Apr 21;5:293-308
pubmed: 32355904
Science. 2011 May 27;332(6033):1100-4
pubmed: 21617077
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021 May;4:100061
pubmed: 33997831
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 23;8(10):e77952
pubmed: 24194904
Psychol Methods. 2002 Dec;7(4):422-45
pubmed: 12530702
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Jan;172:89-97
pubmed: 27914936
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 17;18(22):
pubmed: 34831833
Psychol Health. 2021 Aug 02;:1-24
pubmed: 34339328
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2003 May;35(2):217-26
pubmed: 12834076