DNA metabarcoding reveals high relative abundance of trunk disease fungi in grapevines from Marlborough, New Zealand.
DNA metabarcoding
Fungi
Grapevine trunk disease
Pathogen identification
Specific PCR
Journal
BMC microbiology
ISSN: 1471-2180
Titre abrégé: BMC Microbiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100966981
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 05 2022
10 05 2022
Historique:
received:
25
11
2021
accepted:
01
04
2022
entrez:
10
5
2022
pubmed:
11
5
2022
medline:
14
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Grapevine trunk diseases (GTDs) are a threat to grape production worldwide, with a diverse collection of fungal species implicated in disease onset. Due to the long-term and complex nature of GTDs, simultaneous detection of multiple microbial species can enhance understanding of disease development. We used DNA metabarcoding of ribosomal internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) sequences, supported by specific PCR and microbial isolation, to establish the presence of trunk pathogens across 11 vineyards (11-26 years old) over three years in Marlborough, the largest wine producing region in New Zealand. Using a reference database of trunk pathogen sequences, species previously associated with GTD, such as Cadophora luteo-olivacea, Diplodia seriata, Diplodia mutila, Neofusicoccum australe, and Seimatosporium vitis, were identified as highly represented across the vineyard region. The well-known pathogens Phaeomoniella chlamydospora and Eutypa lata had especially high relative abundance across the dataset, with P. chlamydospora reads present between 22 and 84% (average 52%) across the vineyards. Screening of sequences against broader, publicly available databases revealed further fungal species within families and orders known to contain pathogens, many of which appeared to be endemic to New Zealand. The presence of several wood-rotting basidiomycetes (mostly Hymenochaetales) was detected for the first time in the Marlborough vineyard region, notably, the native Inonotus nothofagii which was present at 1-2% relative abundance in two vineyards.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35538413
doi: 10.1186/s12866-022-02520-2
pii: 10.1186/s12866-022-02520-2
pmc: PMC9088082
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
126Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Plant Dis. 2014 Apr;98(4):469-482
pubmed: 30708729
Methods Mol Biol. 2000;132:365-86
pubmed: 10547847
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 22;8(4):e61217
pubmed: 23630581
Fungal Biol. 2016 Nov;120(11):1291-1322
pubmed: 27742091
Bioinformatics. 2010 Oct 1;26(19):2460-1
pubmed: 20709691
Plant Dis. 2017 Aug;101(8):1470-1480
pubmed: 30678588
BMC Genomics. 2015 Jun 19;16:469
pubmed: 26084502
BMC Microbiol. 2018 Dec 14;18(1):214
pubmed: 30547761
New Phytol. 2010 Apr;186(2):281-5
pubmed: 20409185
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2015 Apr;85:117-30
pubmed: 25701073
Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Jul 3;45(W1):W180-W188
pubmed: 28449106
Bioinformatics. 2011 Aug 15;27(16):2194-200
pubmed: 21700674
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Aug 21;8:1442
pubmed: 28871268
Plant Dis. 2018 Jan;102(1):12-39
pubmed: 30673457
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 May;73(9):2911-8
pubmed: 17463292
Nat Methods. 2013 Oct;10(10):996-8
pubmed: 23955772
Plant Dis. 2018 Jun;102(6):1081-1092
pubmed: 30673434
Bioinformatics. 2012 Jun 15;28(12):1647-9
pubmed: 22543367
Plant Dis. 1999 May;83(5):404-418
pubmed: 30845530
J Mol Biol. 1990 Oct 5;215(3):403-10
pubmed: 2231712
Microb Ecol. 2019 May;77(4):866-876
pubmed: 30397796