Assessment tools for measurement of dementia-friendliness of a community: A scoping review.

baseline assessment dementia-friendly dementia-friendly community measurement of dementia-friendliness questionnaire survey

Journal

Dementia (London, England)
ISSN: 1741-2684
Titre abrégé: Dementia (London)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101128698

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2022
Historique:
pubmed: 12 5 2022
medline: 28 6 2022
entrez: 11 5 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

A quantitative assessment of the dementia-friendliness of a community can support planning and evaluation of dementia-friendly community (DFC) initiatives, internal review, and national/international comparisons, encouraging a more systematic and strategic approach to the advancement of DFCs. However, assessment of the dementia-friendliness of a community is not always conducted and continuous improvement and evaluation of the impact of dementia-friendly initiatives are not always undertaken. A dearth of applicable evaluation tools is one reason why there is a lack of quantitative assessments of the dementia-friendliness of communities working on DFC initiatives. A scoping review was conducted to identify and examine assessment tools that can be used to conduct quantitative assessments of the dementia-friendliness of a community. Peer-reviewed studies related to DFCs were identified through a search of seven electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase, EMCare, HealthSTAR, and AgeLine). Grey literature on DFCs was identified through a search of the World Wide Web and personal communication with community leads in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Characteristics of identified assessment tools were tabulated, and a narrative summary of findings was developed along with a discussion of strengths and weaknesses of identified tools. Forty tools that assess DFC features (built environment, dementia awareness and attitudes, and community needs) were identified. None of the identified tools were deemed comprehensive enough for the assessment of community needs of people with dementia.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
A quantitative assessment of the dementia-friendliness of a community can support planning and evaluation of dementia-friendly community (DFC) initiatives, internal review, and national/international comparisons, encouraging a more systematic and strategic approach to the advancement of DFCs. However, assessment of the dementia-friendliness of a community is not always conducted and continuous improvement and evaluation of the impact of dementia-friendly initiatives are not always undertaken. A dearth of applicable evaluation tools is one reason why there is a lack of quantitative assessments of the dementia-friendliness of communities working on DFC initiatives.
PURPOSE OBJECTIVE
A scoping review was conducted to identify and examine assessment tools that can be used to conduct quantitative assessments of the dementia-friendliness of a community.
DESIGN AND METHODS METHODS
Peer-reviewed studies related to DFCs were identified through a search of seven electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase, EMCare, HealthSTAR, and AgeLine). Grey literature on DFCs was identified through a search of the World Wide Web and personal communication with community leads in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Characteristics of identified assessment tools were tabulated, and a narrative summary of findings was developed along with a discussion of strengths and weaknesses of identified tools.
RESULTS RESULTS
Forty tools that assess DFC features (built environment, dementia awareness and attitudes, and community needs) were identified. None of the identified tools were deemed comprehensive enough for the assessment of community needs of people with dementia.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35543328
doi: 10.1177/14713012221090032
pmc: PMC9243452
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1825-1855

Références

Int Psychogeriatr. 2017 Feb;29(2):195-208
pubmed: 27806743
Int Psychogeriatr. 2017 Feb;29(2):303-311
pubmed: 27821211
Aging Ment Health. 2021 Mar;25(3):397-407
pubmed: 31791140
J Health Psychol. 2022 Feb;27(2):374-385
pubmed: 32909455
Gerontologist. 2015 Apr;55(2):237-44
pubmed: 26035599
Aging Ment Health. 2018 Aug;22(8):947-953
pubmed: 28481643
JAMA Neurol. 2021 Jun 1;78(6):657-665
pubmed: 33779684
Dementia (London). 2017 Jul;16(5):611-628
pubmed: 26493235
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Mar 20;20(1):82
pubmed: 32192471
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2011 Jun;19(6):491-6
pubmed: 21502853
Int Psychogeriatr. 2018 Jan;30(1):5-14
pubmed: 28784193
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2020 May;20(5):397-413
pubmed: 32133754
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Aug 14;19(1):220
pubmed: 31412788
JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Oct;18(10):2119-2126
pubmed: 33038124
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2011 Jan;26(1):12-20
pubmed: 21157846
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Sep;67(9):1907-1912
pubmed: 31389002
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019 Aug;34(8):1235-1243
pubmed: 30993756
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Feb 1;18(1):33
pubmed: 29390970
PLoS One. 2016 May 16;11(5):e0155480
pubmed: 27183297
J Clin Nurs. 2019 Jun;28(11-12):2035-2045
pubmed: 30554458
Aging Ment Health. 2020 Jul;24(7):1175-1181
pubmed: 31081351
Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2021 May 12;7:23337214211013596
pubmed: 34036118
Health Soc Care Community. 2017 May;25(3):858-867
pubmed: 27406118
Ageing Res Rev. 2012 Jan;11(1):67-77
pubmed: 21983429
Aging Ment Health. 2018 Jun;22(6):723-729
pubmed: 28513210
Dementia (London). 2021 Jul;20(5):1711-1722
pubmed: 33031000
Health Place. 2021 Jan;67:102483
pubmed: 33254054
Dementia (London). 2019 Jul;18(5):1858-1895
pubmed: 28933191
J Adv Nurs. 2019 Nov;75(11):2878-2889
pubmed: 31236955
Aging Ment Health. 2013;17(7):793-800
pubmed: 23701394
Palliat Med. 2019 Mar;33(3):274-290
pubmed: 30404576
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473
pubmed: 30178033
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2008 Jun-Jul;23(3):267-73
pubmed: 18460682
Implement Sci. 2010 Sep 20;5:69
pubmed: 20854677
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Jul 31;17(1):168
pubmed: 28760154
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018 Aug;33(8):1139-1145
pubmed: 29851166
Dementia (London). 2021 Aug;20(6):1940-1957
pubmed: 33307762
Int Psychogeriatr. 2013 Nov;25(11):1899-907
pubmed: 23947900
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1984 Dec;47(6):1191-205
pubmed: 6527214
J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 May;53(5):459-68
pubmed: 10812317
Gerontologist. 1999 Apr;39(2):177-85
pubmed: 10224714
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2011;31(6):406-12
pubmed: 21757904
Australas J Ageing. 2017 Mar;36(1):38-45
pubmed: 26970426
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Aug;235:112336
pubmed: 31272077
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Jul;107:103576
pubmed: 32380259

Auteurs

Laura G Diaz (LG)

School of Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute for Applied Health Sciences Building, 62703McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Evelyne Durocher (E)

School of Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute for Applied Health Sciences Building, 62703McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Paula Gardner (P)

Department of Communication Studies and Media Arts, Faculty of Humanities, 62703McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Carrie McAiney (C)

School of Public Health and Systems, 8430University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada; and Schlegel-UW Research Institute for Aging, 8430University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.

Vishal Mokashi (V)

School of Life Sciences, Faculty of Life Science, 62703McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Lori Letts (L)

School of Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute for Applied Health Sciences Building, 62703McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH