'Get your own house in order': Qualitative dialogue groups with nonvaccinating parents on how measles outbreaks in their community should be managed.

childhood vaccination deliberative methods outbreak management qualitative methods vaccine rejection

Journal

Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy
ISSN: 1369-7625
Titre abrégé: Health Expect
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9815926

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2022
Historique:
revised: 15 03 2022
received: 13 10 2021
accepted: 15 04 2022
pubmed: 14 5 2022
medline: 30 7 2022
entrez: 13 5 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Communities with high levels of vaccine rejection present unique challenges to vaccine-preventable disease outbreak management. We sought perspectives of nonvaccinating parents to inform public health responses in such communities. Nineteen purposively sampled nonvaccinating Australian parents participated in one of seven online dialogue groups. We asked what they thought parents, school principals and public health professionals should do in a hypothetical school measles outbreak and used a framework approach to data analysis. Parents' views were grounded in strong beliefs in parental responsibility and the belief that vaccines are not effective, thus unvaccinated children do not therefore pose a threat. They then reasoned that the forced exclusion of unvaccinated children from school in a measles outbreak was disproportionate to the risk they pose, and their child's right to education should not be overridden. Nonvaccinating parents judged that all parents should keep sick children at home regardless of disease or vaccination status; that school principals should communicate directly with parents and avoid using social media; that public health professionals should provide information to parents so they can decide for themselves about excluding their children from school; that public health responses should avoid accidental identification of unvaccinated children and that mainstream media should be avoided as a communication tool. Nonvaccinating parents do not always agree with current Australian approaches to measles outbreak management. Their perspectives can inform approaches to outbreak responses in communities with high levels of vaccine rejection. We sought input from individuals who did and did not vaccinate on study design in its early phases. Individual conversations were used deliberately as we felt the group advisory situation may have felt less safe for nonvaccinating parents, given the divisive and often hostile nature of the topic.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35548872
doi: 10.1111/hex.13511
pmc: PMC9327825
doi:

Substances chimiques

Vaccines 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1678-1690

Informations de copyright

© 2022 The Authors. Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

BMC Public Health. 2014 Dec 18;14:1305
pubmed: 25524217
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 18;13:117
pubmed: 24047204
BMC Public Health. 2021 Apr 9;21(1):578
pubmed: 33832447
Qual Health Res. 2016 May;26(6):741-9
pubmed: 26935719
Soc Sci Med. 2016 May;157:103-10
pubmed: 27082021
Vaccine. 2018 Mar 14;36(12):1621-1626
pubmed: 29449097
J Bioeth Inq. 2017 Mar;14(1):65-76
pubmed: 27909947
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Nov 13;69(45):1700-1705
pubmed: 33180759
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Oct;263:113259
pubmed: 32799028
SSM Popul Health. 2021 Sep 16;16:100926
pubmed: 34604497
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Jul;257:112015
pubmed: 30442504
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Mar;224:23-27
pubmed: 30735925
Med Anthropol Q. 2015 Jun;29(2):137-56
pubmed: 25294256
Med J Aust. 2016 Apr 18;204(7):275
pubmed: 27078604
BMJ Open. 2019 May 28;9(5):e026299
pubmed: 31142523
Med Anthropol Q. 2015 Sep;29(3):381-99
pubmed: 25847214
Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1678-1690
pubmed: 35548872
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 12;12(10):e0185955
pubmed: 29023499
Hum Fertil (Camb). 2017 Apr;20(1):22-29
pubmed: 27841038
BMJ. 2020 Nov 16;371:m4450
pubmed: 33199396

Auteurs

Kerrie Wiley (K)

Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Penelope Robinson (P)

Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Chris Degeling (C)

Australian Centre for Health Engagement, Evidence and Values (ACHEEV), The University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.

Paul Ward (P)

Faculty of Health, Torrens University, Adelaide, Australia.

Julie Leask (J)

Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Stacy Carter (S)

Australian Centre for Health Engagement, Evidence and Values (ACHEEV), The University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH