Utilization of Immunotherapy in Patients with Cancer Treated in Routine Care Settings: A Population-Based Study Using Health Administrative Data.
advanced cancer
immunotherapy
population-based study
universal healthcare system
utilization
Journal
The oncologist
ISSN: 1549-490X
Titre abrégé: Oncologist
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9607837
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 08 2022
05 08 2022
Historique:
received:
22
11
2021
accepted:
23
03
2022
pubmed:
14
5
2022
medline:
10
8
2022
entrez:
13
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The introduction of immunotherapy (IO) in the treatment of patients with cancer has significantly improved clinical outcomes. Population level information on actual IO utilization is limited. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using provincial health administrative data from Ontario, Canada to: (1) assess the extent of IO use from 2011 (pre-IO funding) to 2019; and (2) identify factors associated with IO use in patients with advanced cancers for which IO is reimbursed including melanoma, bladder, lung, head and neck, and kidney tumors. The datasets were linked using a unique encoded identifier. A Fine and Gray regression model with death as a competing risk was used to identify factors associated with IO use. Among 59 510 patients assessed, 8771 (14.7%) received IO between 2011 and 2019. Use of IO increased annually from 2011 (3.3%) to 2019 (39.2%) and was highest in melanoma (52%) and lowest in head and neck cancer (6.6%). In adjusted analysis, factors associated with lower IO use included older age (hazard ratio (HR) 0.91 (95% CI, 0.89-0.93)), female sex (HR 0.85 (95% CI, 0.81-0.89)), lower-income quintile, hospital admission (HR 0.78 (95% CI, 0.75-0.82)), high Charlson score and de novo stage 4 cancer. IO use was heterogeneous across cancer centers and regions. IO utilization for advanced cancers rose substantially since initial approval albeit use is associated with patient characteristics and system-level factors even in a universal healthcare setting. To optimize IO utilization in routine practice, survival estimates and potential inequity in access should be further investigated and addressed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35552444
pii: 6585297
doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac085
pmc: PMC9355820
doi:
Substances chimiques
Immunologic Factors
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
675-684Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press.
Références
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e2111113
pubmed: 34019086
N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 19;363(8):711-23
pubmed: 20525992
Radiat Oncol. 2020 Oct 29;15(1):247
pubmed: 33121520
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Aug 1;4(8):e180798
pubmed: 29800974
PLoS Med. 2015 Oct 06;12(10):e1001885
pubmed: 26440803
N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 10;375(19):1823-1833
pubmed: 27718847
Curr Oncol. 2009 Jan;16(1):4-15
pubmed: 19229367
JAMA Oncol. 2021 Dec 01;7(12):1843-1850
pubmed: 34734979
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 22;376(25):2415-2426
pubmed: 28636851
J Clin Invest. 2015 Sep;125(9):3335-7
pubmed: 26325031
Curr Oncol. 2019 Apr;26(2):e167-e174
pubmed: 31043823
N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 05;378(14):1277-1290
pubmed: 29562145
J Thorac Oncol. 2017 Mar;12(3):437-445
pubmed: 28109804
Clin Ther. 2016 Jul;38(7):1551-66
pubmed: 27158009
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 May 3;2(5):e192535
pubmed: 31050774
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Feb 10;35(5):529-535
pubmed: 28045621
J Immunother Cancer. 2019 Nov 7;7(1):289
pubmed: 31699149
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 14;12(4):e0175679
pubmed: 28410405
CMAJ Open. 2019 Aug 20;7(3):E516-E523
pubmed: 31431484
N Engl J Med. 2017 Mar 16;376(11):1015-1026
pubmed: 28212060