Effect of pulmonary artery pressure-guided therapy on heart failure readmission in a nationally representative cohort.
CardioMEMS device
Heart failure
Pulmonary artery pressure-guided therapy
Readmission
Journal
ESC heart failure
ISSN: 2055-5822
Titre abrégé: ESC Heart Fail
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101669191
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2022
08 2022
Historique:
revised:
28
03
2022
received:
30
11
2021
accepted:
14
04
2022
pubmed:
14
5
2022
medline:
20
7
2022
entrez:
13
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Pulmonary artery pressure (PAP)-guided therapy in patients with heart failure (HF) using the CardioMEMS (CMM) device, an implantable PAP sensor, has been shown to reduce HF hospitalizations in previous studies. We sought to evaluate the clinical benefit of the CMM device in regard to 30, 90, and 180 day readmission rates in real-world usage. We queried the Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) to identify patients who underwent CMM implantation (International Classification of Diseases 9 and 10 codes) between the years 2014 and 2019 and studied their HF readmissions. Moreover, we compared CMM patients and their readmissions with a matched cohort of patients with HF but without CMM. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to adjust for other predictors of readmissions. Prior to matching, we identified 5 326 530 weighted HF patients without CMM and 1842 patients with CMM. After propensity score matching for several patients and hospital-related characteristics, the cohort consisted of 1839 patients with CMM and 1924 with HF without CMM. Before matching, CMM patients were younger (67.0 ± 13.5 years vs. 72.3 ± 14.1 years, P < 0.001), more frequently male (62.7% vs. 51.5%, P < 0.001), with higher rates of prior percutaneous coronary intervention (16.9% vs. 13.2%, P = 0.002), peripheral vascular disease (29.6% vs. 17.8%, P < 0.001), pulmonary circulatory disorder (38.7% vs. 23.2%, P < 0.001), atrial fibrillation (51.2% vs. 45.3%, P = 0.002), prior left ventricular assist device (1.8% vs. 0.2%, P < 0.001), high income (32.2% vs. 16.4%, P < 0.001), and acute kidney disease (43.8% vs. 29.9%, P < 0.001). Readmission rates at 30 days were 17.3% vs. 20.9% for patients with vs. without CMM, respectively, and remained statistically significant after matching (17.3% vs. 21.5%, P = 0.002). The rates of 90 day (29.6% vs. 36.5%, P = 0.002) and 180 day (39.6% vs. 46.6%, P = 0.009) readmissions were lower in the CMM group. In a multivariable regression model, CMM was associated with lower risk of readmissions (hazard ratio 0.75, 95% confidence interval 0.63-0.89, P = 0.001). The CMM device was associated with reduced HF rehospitalization rates in a nationally representative cohort of HF patients, validating the clinical trial that led to the approval of this device and its utilization in the treatment of HF.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35560987
doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13956
pmc: PMC9288808
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2511-2517Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.
Références
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Mar 26;61(12):1259-67
pubmed: 23500328
N Engl J Med. 2010 Dec 9;363(24):2301-9
pubmed: 21080835
N Engl J Med. 2020 Oct 8;383(15):1413-1424
pubmed: 32865377
Lancet. 2021 Sep 11;398(10304):991-1001
pubmed: 34461042
N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 24;381(17):1609-1620
pubmed: 31475794
Lancet. 2016 Jan 30;387(10017):453-61
pubmed: 26560249
Circ Heart Fail. 2017 Jan;10(1):
pubmed: 28062538
Circ Heart Fail. 2013 May;6(3):606-19
pubmed: 23616602
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 14;382(20):1883-1893
pubmed: 32222134
N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 11;371(11):993-1004
pubmed: 25176015
Circulation. 2011 May 3;123(17):1873-80
pubmed: 21444883
Eur J Intern Med. 2021 Feb;84:56-62
pubmed: 33039191
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Oct 10;70(15):1875-1886
pubmed: 28982501
Lancet. 2010 Sep 11;376(9744):875-85
pubmed: 20801500
Eur J Heart Fail. 2020 Oct;22(10):1891-1901
pubmed: 32592227
Circ Heart Fail. 2020 Aug;13(8):e006863
pubmed: 32757642
Lancet Public Health. 2019 Aug;4(8):e406-e420
pubmed: 31376859
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Jul 14;38:101008
pubmed: 34308315
Med Care. 2005 Nov;43(11):1130-9
pubmed: 16224307
ESC Heart Fail. 2022 Aug;9(4):2511-2517
pubmed: 35560987
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 May 1;4(5):444-453
pubmed: 30969316
N Engl J Med. 2019 Nov 21;381(21):1995-2008
pubmed: 31535829
Circ Heart Fail. 2010 Sep;3(5):580-7
pubmed: 20562255
Lancet. 2011 Feb 19;377(9766):658-66
pubmed: 21315441
JACC Heart Fail. 2016 May;4(5):368-75
pubmed: 26874380
Circ Heart Fail. 2016 Jun;9(6):
pubmed: 27220593