Pit characters determine drought-induced embolism resistance of leaf xylem across 18 Neotropical tree species.
Journal
Plant physiology
ISSN: 1532-2548
Titre abrégé: Plant Physiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0401224
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 08 2022
29 08 2022
Historique:
received:
07
01
2022
accepted:
19
04
2022
pubmed:
15
5
2022
medline:
9
9
2022
entrez:
14
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Embolism spreading in xylem is an important component of plant drought resistance. Since embolism resistance has been shown to be mechanistically linked to pit membrane characters in stem xylem, we speculate that similar mechanisms account for leaf xylem. We conducted transmission electron microscopy to investigate pit membrane characters in leaf xylem across 18 Neotropical tree species. We also conducted gold perfusion and polar lipid detection experiments on three species covering the full range of leaf embolism resistance. We then related these observations to previously published data on embolism resistance of leaf xylem. We also incorporated previously published data on stem embolism resistance and stem xylem pit membranes to investigate the link between vulnerability segmentation (i.e. difference in embolism resistance) and leaf-stem anatomical variation. Maximum pit membrane thickness (Tpm,max) and the pit membrane thickness-to-diameter ratio (Tpm,max/Dpm) were predictive of leaf embolism resistance, especially when vestured pits were taken into account. Variation in Tpm,max/Dpm was the only trait predictive of vulnerability segmentation between leaves and stems. Gold particles of 5- and 10-nm infiltrated pit membranes in three species, while the entry of 50-nm particles was blocked. Moreover, polar lipids were associated with inner conduit walls and pits. Our results suggest that mechanisms related to embolism spreading are determined by Tpm, pore constrictions (i.e. the narrowest bottlenecks along pore pathways), and lipid surfactants, which are largely similar between leaf and stem xylem and between temperate and tropical trees. However, our mechanistic understanding of embolism propagation and the functional relevance of Tpm,max/Dpm remains elusive.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35567500
pii: 6585882
doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiac223
pmc: PMC9434246
doi:
Substances chimiques
Lipids
0
Water
059QF0KO0R
Gold
7440-57-5
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
371-386Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© American Society of Plant Biologists 2022. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Références
Plant Cell Environ. 2022 Apr;45(4):1204-1215
pubmed: 34984700
Am J Bot. 2018 Feb;105(2):172-185
pubmed: 29578294
J Exp Bot. 2018 Nov 26;69(22):5611-5623
pubmed: 30184113
Ann Bot. 2019 Aug 2;124(1):1-14
pubmed: 30590483
Plant Physiol. 2016 Nov;172(3):1657-1668
pubmed: 27613852
Ecol Lett. 2017 Nov;20(11):1437-1447
pubmed: 28922708
New Phytol. 2021 Feb;229(4):1955-1969
pubmed: 33098088
Tree Physiol. 2020 Apr 8;40(4):433-444
pubmed: 32031666
New Phytol. 2016 Mar;209(4):1403-9
pubmed: 26742653
New Phytol. 2018 May;218(3):1025-1035
pubmed: 29528498
Tree Physiol. 2013 Jul;33(7):684-94
pubmed: 23933827
New Phytol. 2021 Jun;230(5):1829-1843
pubmed: 33595117
Plant J. 2021 Mar;105(6):1477-1494
pubmed: 33295003
New Phytol. 2019 Mar;221(4):1802-1813
pubmed: 30312484
Plant Physiol. 2017 Feb;173(2):1177-1196
pubmed: 27927981
New Phytol. 2020 Oct;228(2):512-524
pubmed: 32496575
New Phytol. 2019 Oct;224(2):632-643
pubmed: 31264226
New Phytol. 2017 Apr;214(2):561-569
pubmed: 28124474
Plant Cell Environ. 2017 Oct;40(10):2133-2146
pubmed: 28667823
Plant Cell Environ. 2016 Sep;39(9):1886-94
pubmed: 26648337
Plant Cell Environ. 2016 Apr;39(4):944-50
pubmed: 26868162
New Phytol. 2008;177(3):608-626
pubmed: 18086228
New Phytol. 2019 Mar;221(4):1831-1842
pubmed: 30347122
Tree Physiol. 2011 Apr;31(4):361-8
pubmed: 21470981
Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2022 Jan 6;:
pubmed: 34990084
J Microsc. 2015 Sep;259(3):228-36
pubmed: 25925133
Planta. 2009 Aug;230(3):459-68
pubmed: 19495788
J Exp Bot. 2004 Jul;55(402):1569-75
pubmed: 15181107
Plant Physiol. 2018 Jul;177(3):1066-1077
pubmed: 29789436
Tree Physiol. 2016 Aug;36(8):983-93
pubmed: 27146334
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Jun 8;101(23):8833-7
pubmed: 15163796
J Exp Bot. 2019 Jun 28;70(12):3227-3240
pubmed: 30921455
New Phytol. 2021 Feb;229(3):1453-1466
pubmed: 32964439
Plant Cell Environ. 2020 Jan;43(1):116-130
pubmed: 31595539
Plant Cell Environ. 2021 May;44(5):1329-1345
pubmed: 33529382
Trends Plant Sci. 2015 Apr;20(4):199-205
pubmed: 25680733
Tree Physiol. 2011 Jun;31(6):659-68
pubmed: 21724585
Plant Physiol. 2018 Nov;178(3):1142-1153
pubmed: 30217826
J Plant Hydraul. 2014;1:
pubmed: 27631027
Tree Physiol. 2022 May 12;:
pubmed: 35552762
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Dec 16;12:732701
pubmed: 34975934
Plant Physiol. 2017 Feb;173(2):1197-1210
pubmed: 28049739
J Exp Bot. 2016 Sep;67(17):5029-39
pubmed: 27388214
New Phytol. 2018 Jul;219(1):109-121
pubmed: 29774944
New Phytol. 2016 Apr;210(2):443-58
pubmed: 26720626
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Apr 26;113(17):4865-9
pubmed: 27071104
Tree Physiol. 1998 Aug-Sep;18(8_9):589-593
pubmed: 12651346
Ann Bot. 2021 Jul 30;128(2):171-182
pubmed: 33216143
Nat Plants. 2016 May 27;2(6):16072
pubmed: 27255836
Ann Bot. 2014 Aug;114(2):325-34
pubmed: 24918205
Science. 2020 Apr 17;368(6488):261-266
pubmed: 32299945
Plant Divers. 2020 Nov 26;43(4):324-330
pubmed: 34485775
New Phytol. 2011 May;190(3):709-23
pubmed: 21054413