Final Results of Neoadjuvant Atezolizumab in Cisplatin-ineligible Patients with Muscle-invasive Urothelial Cancer of the Bladder.


Journal

European urology
ISSN: 1873-7560
Titre abrégé: Eur Urol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 7512719

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2022
Historique:
received: 23 12 2021
revised: 20 03 2022
accepted: 09 04 2022
pubmed: 17 5 2022
medline: 14 7 2022
entrez: 16 5 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Neoadjuvant immunotherapies hold promise in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). To report on 2-yr disease-free (DFS) and overall (OS) survival including novel tissue-based biomarkers and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in the ABACUS trial. ABACUS was a multicenter, single-arm, neoadjuvant, phase 2 trial, including patients with MIBC (T2-4aN0M0) who were ineligible for or refused neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Two cycles of atezolizumab were given prior to radical cystectomy. Serial tissue and blood samples were collected. The primary endpoints of pathological complete response (pCR) rate and dynamic changes to T-cell biomarkers were published previously. Secondary outcomes were 2-yr DFS and OS. A biomarker analysis correlated with relapse-free survival (RFS) was performed, which includes FOXP3, major histocompatibility complex class I, CD8/CD39, and sequential ctDNA measurements. The median follow-up time was 25 mo (95% confidence interval [CI] 25-26). Ninety-five patients received at least one cycle of atezolizumab. Eight patients did not undergo cystectomy (only one due to disease progression). The pCR rate was 31% (27/88; 95% CI 21-41). Two-year DFS and OS were 68% (95% CI 58-76) and 77% (95% CI 68-85), respectively. Two-year DFS in patients achieving a pCR was 85% (95% CI 65-94). Baseline PD-L1 and tumor mutational burden did not correlate with RFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.60 [95% CI 0.24-1.5], p = 0.26, and 0.72 [95% CI 0.31-1.7], p = 0.46, respectively). RFS correlated with high baseline stromal CD8+ (HR 0.25 [95% CI 0.09-0.68], p = 0.007) and high post-treatment fibroblast activation protein (HR 4.1 [95% CI 1.3-13], p = 0.01). Circulating tumor DNA positivity values at baseline, after neoadjuvant therapy, and after surgery were 63% (25/40), 47% (14/30), and 14% (five/36), respectively. The ctDNA status was highly prognostic at all time points. No relapses were observed in ctDNA-negative patients at baseline and after neoadjuvant therapy. The lack of randomization and exploratory nature of the biomarker analysis are limitations of this work. Neoadjuvant atezolizumab in MIBC is associated with clinical responses and high DFS. CD8+ expression and serial ctDNA levels correlated with outcomes, and may contribute to personalized therapy in the future. We showed that bladder cancer patients receiving immunotherapy followed by cystectomy have good long-term outcomes. Furthermore, we found that certain biological features can predict patients who might have particular benefit from this therapy.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Neoadjuvant immunotherapies hold promise in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).
OBJECTIVE
To report on 2-yr disease-free (DFS) and overall (OS) survival including novel tissue-based biomarkers and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in the ABACUS trial.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
ABACUS was a multicenter, single-arm, neoadjuvant, phase 2 trial, including patients with MIBC (T2-4aN0M0) who were ineligible for or refused neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy.
INTERVENTION
Two cycles of atezolizumab were given prior to radical cystectomy. Serial tissue and blood samples were collected.
OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
The primary endpoints of pathological complete response (pCR) rate and dynamic changes to T-cell biomarkers were published previously. Secondary outcomes were 2-yr DFS and OS. A biomarker analysis correlated with relapse-free survival (RFS) was performed, which includes FOXP3, major histocompatibility complex class I, CD8/CD39, and sequential ctDNA measurements.
RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS
The median follow-up time was 25 mo (95% confidence interval [CI] 25-26). Ninety-five patients received at least one cycle of atezolizumab. Eight patients did not undergo cystectomy (only one due to disease progression). The pCR rate was 31% (27/88; 95% CI 21-41). Two-year DFS and OS were 68% (95% CI 58-76) and 77% (95% CI 68-85), respectively. Two-year DFS in patients achieving a pCR was 85% (95% CI 65-94). Baseline PD-L1 and tumor mutational burden did not correlate with RFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.60 [95% CI 0.24-1.5], p = 0.26, and 0.72 [95% CI 0.31-1.7], p = 0.46, respectively). RFS correlated with high baseline stromal CD8+ (HR 0.25 [95% CI 0.09-0.68], p = 0.007) and high post-treatment fibroblast activation protein (HR 4.1 [95% CI 1.3-13], p = 0.01). Circulating tumor DNA positivity values at baseline, after neoadjuvant therapy, and after surgery were 63% (25/40), 47% (14/30), and 14% (five/36), respectively. The ctDNA status was highly prognostic at all time points. No relapses were observed in ctDNA-negative patients at baseline and after neoadjuvant therapy. The lack of randomization and exploratory nature of the biomarker analysis are limitations of this work.
CONCLUSIONS
Neoadjuvant atezolizumab in MIBC is associated with clinical responses and high DFS. CD8+ expression and serial ctDNA levels correlated with outcomes, and may contribute to personalized therapy in the future.
PATIENT SUMMARY
We showed that bladder cancer patients receiving immunotherapy followed by cystectomy have good long-term outcomes. Furthermore, we found that certain biological features can predict patients who might have particular benefit from this therapy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35577646
pii: S0302-2838(22)02219-9
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.04.013
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized 0
Circulating Tumor DNA 0
atezolizumab 52CMI0WC3Y
Cisplatin Q20Q21Q62J

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase II Journal Article Multicenter Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

212-222

Subventions

Organisme : Cancer Research UK
Pays : United Kingdom

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Bernadett Szabados (B)

Barts Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK; Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Mark Kockx (M)

CellCarta N V, Wilrijk, Belgium.

Zoe June Assaf (ZJ)

Genentech, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Pieter-Jan van Dam (PJ)

CellCarta N V, Wilrijk, Belgium.

Alejo Rodriguez-Vida (A)

Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.

Ignacio Duran (I)

Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, IBiS/Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio/CSIC/Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.

Simon J Crabb (SJ)

Southampton Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Michiel S Van Der Heijden (MS)

Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Albert Font Pous (AF)

Institut Catala d'Oncologia, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain.

Gwenaelle Gravis (G)

Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.

Urbano Anido Herranz (UA)

Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago, Santiago De Compostela, Spain.

Andrew Protheroe (A)

Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK.

Alain Ravaud (A)

Department of Medical Oncology, Hopital Saint-Andre, University of Bordeaux-CHU, Bordeaux, France.

Denis Maillet (D)

Hospital Lyon SUD, Lyon, France.

Maria Jose Mendez (MJ)

Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba, Spain.

Cristina Suarez (C)

Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Mark Linch (M)

UCLH, London, UK.

Aaron Prendergast (A)

Barts Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Charlotte Tyson (C)

Barts Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Diana Stanoeva (D)

CellCarta N V, Wilrijk, Belgium.

Sofie Daelemans (S)

CellCarta N V, Wilrijk, Belgium; Medical Biochemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical, Biomedical and Veterinary Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Miche Rombouts (M)

CellCarta N V, Wilrijk, Belgium.

Sanjeev Mariathasan (S)

Genentech, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Joy S Tea (JS)

Genentech, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Kelly Mousa (K)

Barts Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Shruti Sharma (S)

Natera, Inc., San Carlos, CA, USA.

Alexey Aleshin (A)

Natera, Inc., San Carlos, CA, USA.

Romain Banchereau (R)

Genentech, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Daniel Castellano (D)

Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.

Thomas Powles (T)

Barts Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK. Electronic address: thomas.powles1@nhs.net.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH