Prevalence of anti-TNF contraindications in Crohn's disease: A cross-sectional survey from the GETAID.
Anti-TNF
Contraindication
Crohn's disease
Inflammatory bowel disease
Journal
Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver
ISSN: 1878-3562
Titre abrégé: Dig Liver Dis
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 100958385
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2022
10 2022
Historique:
received:
27
12
2021
revised:
10
04
2022
accepted:
12
04
2022
pubmed:
17
5
2022
medline:
4
10
2022
entrez:
16
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The exact rate of contraindications to anti-TNF therapy and physician perspectives on treatment choices facing to anti-TNF contraindication, are poorly reported. A two-week cross-sectional study was conducted in 31 centres. Physicians completed a questionnaire for a total of 1,314 consecutive outpatients with Crohn's disease, assessing each patient's potential contraindications to anti-TNF therapy, the choice of alternative therapy to anti-TNFs, and their preference in an unrestricted reimbursement setting. Among the 1,293 responses to the first item, 148 (11.5%) reported 32 absolute contraindications (2.5%) and 116 relative contraindications (9.0%) to anti-TNF therapy. When asked about their preference of alternative therapies in those cases with contraindications to anti-TNF, physicians chose ustekinumab and vedolizumab, 75.6% and 23.9%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, the choice of vedolizumab was the preferred choice for patients aged > 60 years with the L2 phenotype and the absence of perianal lesions. In a hypothetical setting of unrestricted reimbursement, anti-TNFs remained physicians' preferred first-line biological therapy choice for 78.2%. Anti-TNF contraindications occurred in up to 11.5% of patients with Crohn's disease. Physicians' choices for alternative therapy to anti-TNF relied on ustekinumab in 75.6% and vedolizumab in 23.9% of these cases. This choice was driven mainly by phenotypical criteria and age.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The exact rate of contraindications to anti-TNF therapy and physician perspectives on treatment choices facing to anti-TNF contraindication, are poorly reported.
METHODS
A two-week cross-sectional study was conducted in 31 centres. Physicians completed a questionnaire for a total of 1,314 consecutive outpatients with Crohn's disease, assessing each patient's potential contraindications to anti-TNF therapy, the choice of alternative therapy to anti-TNFs, and their preference in an unrestricted reimbursement setting.
RESULTS
Among the 1,293 responses to the first item, 148 (11.5%) reported 32 absolute contraindications (2.5%) and 116 relative contraindications (9.0%) to anti-TNF therapy. When asked about their preference of alternative therapies in those cases with contraindications to anti-TNF, physicians chose ustekinumab and vedolizumab, 75.6% and 23.9%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, the choice of vedolizumab was the preferred choice for patients aged > 60 years with the L2 phenotype and the absence of perianal lesions. In a hypothetical setting of unrestricted reimbursement, anti-TNFs remained physicians' preferred first-line biological therapy choice for 78.2%.
CONCLUSION
Anti-TNF contraindications occurred in up to 11.5% of patients with Crohn's disease. Physicians' choices for alternative therapy to anti-TNF relied on ustekinumab in 75.6% and vedolizumab in 23.9% of these cases. This choice was driven mainly by phenotypical criteria and age.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35577685
pii: S1590-8658(22)00252-3
doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2022.04.011
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors
0
Ustekinumab
FU77B4U5Z0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1350-1357Investigateurs
Aurelien Amiot
(A)
Charlotte Gagniere
(C)
Maria Nachury
(M)
Pauline Wils
(P)
Yoram Bouhnik
(Y)
Carmen Stefanescu
(C)
Xavier Treton
(X)
Carole Martins
(C)
Mathieu Uzzan
(M)
Melanie Serrero
(M)
Lucas Guillo
(L)
Xavier Roblin
(X)
Emilie Del Tedesco
(ED)
Laurent Beaugerie
(L)
Philippe Seksik
(P)
Anne Bourrier
(A)
Cecilia Landmann
(C)
Julien Kirchgesner
(J)
Harry Sokol
(H)
Anthony Buisson
(A)
Stephane Nancey
(S)
Gilles Boschetti
(G)
Claire Gay
(C)
Pauline Danion
(P)
Bernard Flourié
(B)
Vered Abitbol
(V)
Georgia Malamut
(G)
Jean-Marie Reimund
(JM)
Benedicte Caron
(B)
Lucine Vuitton
(L)
Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
(L)
Camille Zallot
(C)
Cyrielle Gilletta
(C)
Matthieu Allez
(M)
Jean-Marc Gornet
(JM)
Clotilde Baudry
(C)
Stephanie Viennot
(S)
Arnaud Bourreille
(A)
Caroline Trang-Poisson
(C)
Medina Boualit
(M)
Claire Painchart
(C)
Laurianne Plastaras
(L)
Romain Altwegg
(R)
Lucile Boivineau
(L)
Mathurin Fumery
(M)
David Laharie
(D)
Pauline Riviere
(P)
Florian Poullenot
(F)
Benoit Coffin
(B)
Henri Duboc
(H)
Stephane Nahon
(S)
Marion Simon
(M)
Baya Coulibaly
(B)
Elise Chanteloup
(E)
Ginette Fotsing
(G)
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest Maria Nachury has received lecture and consulting fees from Abbvie, Adacyte, Amgen, Arena, Biogen, CTMA, Ferring, Gilead, Janssen, Mayoli Spindler, MSD, Pfizer, Takeda Melanie Serrero has received lecture or consulting fees from Abbvie, Ferring, Amgen, Celltrion, Janssen, Ferring, Takeda and Tillotts. Philippe Seksik received consulting fees from Takeda, Abbvie, Merck-MSD, Biocodex, Janssen, Amgen, Astellas and Pfizer, grants from Biocodex and travel accommodation from Merck-MSD, Takeda and Amgen. Charlotte Gagniere received transport fees from Takeda Arnaud Bourreille received counselling, boards or transport fees from Abbvie, Janssen, Ferring, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda and Tillotts Pharma. Stéphane Nahon reported a relationship with Janssen, Pfizer, Takeda, MSD, Gilead, Ferring Marion Simon reported a relationship with Abbvie, Mylan, Takeda and Amgen Lucas Guillo has received lecture and consulting fees from Abbvie Xavier Roblin reported a relationship with MSD, Pfizer, Celltrion, Abbvie, Amgen, Takeda, Janssen, Ferring, Theradiag. Anthony Buisson has received research funding from Pfizer, lecture fees from Abbvie, Ferring, Hospira, MSD, Janssen, Sanofi-Aventis, Takeda and Vifor Pharma and consulting fees from Abbvie, Biogen, Janssen, Pfizer and Takeda. Stephane Nancey has received consulting fees from Merck, Abbvie, Takeda, Ferring, Norgine, Vifor Pharma, Novartis, Janssen Cilag, Hospira, Takeda and HAC Pharma Vered Abitbol has received lecture fees from Amgen, Biogen, Mylan, Sandoz, Pfizer, Takeda, Janssen, Tillots, Gilead, Ferring Jean-Marie Reimund has received consulting fees from Hospira and Pfizer. This author has also received lectures fees from Abbvie, Biocodex, Ferring, Janssen Cilag, Pfizer and Takeda, as well as travel accommodations from Ferring, Abbvie, MSD, Janssen Cilag, Pfizer, Hospira and Takeda Lucine Vuitton has received lecture fees from Abbvie, MSD, Takeda, Ferring, Janssen, Amgen, Gilead, Celltrion and Pfizer, and research grants from MSD, Takeda and Pfizer. Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet has received consulting fees from Merck, Abbvie, Janssen, Genentech, Ferring, Norgine, Tillots, Vifor, Shire, Therakos, Pharmacosmos, Pilège, BMS, UCB-Pharma, Hospira, Celltrion, Takeda, Biogaran, Boerhinger-Ingelheim, Lilly, Pfizer, and HAC-Pharma. This author has also received lecture fees from Merck, Abbvie, Takeda, Janssen Cilag, Ferring, Norgine, Tillots, Vifor, Therakos, HAC-Pharma, and Mitsubishi. Cyrielle Gilletta received lecture fees from Abbvie, Takeda, Pfizer and Janssen and consulting fees from Abbvie, Janssen and Takeda. Matthieu Allez has received honoraria from Novo Nordisk, MSD, Abbvie, Ferring, Genentech, Janssen, Pfizer, GSK, Hospira, UCB, Novartis, Takeda, Mayolo-Spindler. Stephanie Viennot has received consulting fees from Abbvie, MSD, Takeda, Vifor Pharma and Ferring. Claire Painchart has received travel accommodation from Abbvie, Janssen, Biogene, Fresenius Kabi, Takeda and Pfizer. Mathurin Fumery has received lecture and consulting fees from Abbvie, MSD, Boehringer, Pfizer, Takeda, Janssen and Ferring. David Laharie has received counseling, boards, transports and/or fees from Abbvie, Biogaran, Biogen, Ferring, HAC-pharma, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Prometheus, Roche, Takeda, Theradiag, Tillots. Aurelien Amiot has received consulting fees from Abbvie, Hospira, Takeda, Gilead and Biocodex as well as lecture fees and travel accommodations from Abbvie, Janssen, Biocodex, Hospira, Ferring, Takeda and MSD. This author has also received advisory board fees from Gilead, Takeda and Abbvie. No conflicts of interest are claimed by the remaining authors.