Influence of rotator cuff preload on fracture configuration in proximal humerus fractures: a proof of concept for fracture simulation.
Biomechanical simulation
Fracture configuration
Fracture simulation
Proximal humerus fracture
Rotator cuff
Surgical training
Journal
Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery
ISSN: 1434-3916
Titre abrégé: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9011043
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2023
May 2023
Historique:
received:
07
02
2022
accepted:
26
04
2022
medline:
19
4
2023
pubmed:
18
5
2022
entrez:
17
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In regard of surgical training, the reproducible simulation of life-like proximal humerus fractures in human cadaveric specimens is desirable. The aim of the present study was to develop a technique that allows simulation of realistic proximal humerus fractures and to analyse the influence of rotator cuff preload on the generated lesions in regards of fracture configuration. Ten cadaveric specimens (6 left, 4 right) were fractured using a custom-made drop-test bench, in two groups. Five specimens were fractured without rotator cuff preload, while the other five were fractured with the tendons of the rotator cuff preloaded with 2 kg each. The humeral shaft and the shortened scapula were potted. The humerus was positioned at 90° of abduction and 10° of internal rotation to simulate a fall on the elevated arm. In two specimens of each group, the emergence of the fractures was documented with high-speed video imaging. Pre-fracture radiographs were taken to evaluate the deltoid-tuberosity index as a measure of bone density. Post-fracture X-rays and CT scans were performed to define the exact fracture configurations. Neer's classification was used to analyse the fractures. In all ten cadaveric specimens life-like proximal humerus fractures were achieved. Two III-part and three IV-part fractures resulted in each group. The preloading of the rotator cuff muscles had no further influence on the fracture configuration. High-speed videos of the fracture simulation revealed identical fracture mechanisms for both groups. We observed a two-step fracture mechanism, with initial impaction of the head segment against the glenoid followed by fracturing of the head and the tuberosities and then with further impaction of the shaft against the acromion, which lead to separation of the tuberosities. A high energetic axial impulse can reliably induce realistic proximal humerus fractures in cadaveric specimens. The preload of the rotator cuff muscles had no influence on initial fracture configuration. Therefore, fracture simulation in the proximal humerus is less elaborate. Using the presented technique, pre-fractured specimens are available for real-life surgical education. III.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35579703
doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04471-9
pii: 10.1007/s00402-022-04471-9
pmc: PMC10110707
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2467-2474Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Oct;27(10):1816-1823
pubmed: 29779978
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Oct;(415):139-47
pubmed: 14612640
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Mar;140(3):425-432
pubmed: 31807851
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003 May;85(4):611-7
pubmed: 12793573
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970 Sep;52(6):1077-89
pubmed: 5455339
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Aug;26(8):1462-1468
pubmed: 28372970
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2006 Oct;21(8):799-803
pubmed: 16777282
Z Orthop Unfall. 2020 Jun;158(3):291-297
pubmed: 31533163
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Oct;26(10):e300-e308
pubmed: 28689822
JSES Open Access. 2019 Jun 14;3(2):108-112
pubmed: 31334437
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Sep;473(9):3038-45
pubmed: 25910780
Arthroscopy. 2019 May;35(5):1370-1376
pubmed: 31000387
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006 Mar-Apr;15(2):140-7
pubmed: 16517355
Shoulder Elbow. 2019 Aug;11(4):247-255
pubmed: 31316585
J Orthop Traumatol. 2018 Aug 22;19(1):12
pubmed: 30132086
Shoulder Elbow. 2019 Apr;11(2):87-93
pubmed: 30936946
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Mar;29(3):541-549
pubmed: 31594726
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004 Apr;86(3):413-25
pubmed: 15125131