Heterogeneity and genomic loci of ubiquitous transgenic Cre reporter lines in zebrafish.


Journal

Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists
ISSN: 1097-0177
Titre abrégé: Dev Dyn
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9201927

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 2022
Historique:
revised: 10 05 2022
received: 05 01 2022
accepted: 11 05 2022
pubmed: 19 5 2022
medline: 6 10 2022
entrez: 18 5 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The most-common strategy for zebrafish Cre/lox-mediated lineage labeling experiments combines ubiquitously expressed, lox-based Switch reporter transgenes with tissue-specific Cre or 4-OH-Tamoxifen-inducible CreERT2 driver lines. Although numerous Cre driver lines have been produced, only a few broadly expressed Switch reporters exist in zebrafish and their generation by random transgene integration has been challenging due to position-effect sensitivity of the lox-flanked recombination cassettes. Here, we compare commonly used Switch reporter lines for their recombination efficiency and reporter expression pattern during zebrafish development. Using different experimental setups, we show that ubi:Switch and hsp70l:Switch outperform current generations of the two additional Switch reporters actb2:BFP-DsRed and actb2:Stop-DsRed. Our comparisons also document preferential Cre-dependent recombination of ubi:Switch and hsp70l:Switch in distinct zebrafish tissues at early developmental stages. To investigate what genomic features may influence Cre accessibility and lox recombination efficiency in highly functional Switch lines, we mapped these transgenes and charted chromatin dynamics at their integration sites. Our data documents the heterogeneity among lox-based Switch transgenes toward informing suitable transgene selection for lineage labeling experiments. Our work further proposes that ubi:Switch and hsp70l:Switch define genomic integration sites suitable for universal transgene or switch reporter knock-in in zebrafish.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The most-common strategy for zebrafish Cre/lox-mediated lineage labeling experiments combines ubiquitously expressed, lox-based Switch reporter transgenes with tissue-specific Cre or 4-OH-Tamoxifen-inducible CreERT2 driver lines. Although numerous Cre driver lines have been produced, only a few broadly expressed Switch reporters exist in zebrafish and their generation by random transgene integration has been challenging due to position-effect sensitivity of the lox-flanked recombination cassettes. Here, we compare commonly used Switch reporter lines for their recombination efficiency and reporter expression pattern during zebrafish development.
RESULTS
Using different experimental setups, we show that ubi:Switch and hsp70l:Switch outperform current generations of the two additional Switch reporters actb2:BFP-DsRed and actb2:Stop-DsRed. Our comparisons also document preferential Cre-dependent recombination of ubi:Switch and hsp70l:Switch in distinct zebrafish tissues at early developmental stages. To investigate what genomic features may influence Cre accessibility and lox recombination efficiency in highly functional Switch lines, we mapped these transgenes and charted chromatin dynamics at their integration sites.
CONCLUSIONS
Our data documents the heterogeneity among lox-based Switch transgenes toward informing suitable transgene selection for lineage labeling experiments. Our work further proposes that ubi:Switch and hsp70l:Switch define genomic integration sites suitable for universal transgene or switch reporter knock-in in zebrafish.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35582941
doi: 10.1002/dvdy.499
pmc: PMC10069295
mid: NIHMS1884074
doi:

Substances chimiques

Chromatin 0
Tamoxifen 094ZI81Y45
Cre recombinase EC 2.7.7.-
Integrases EC 2.7.7.-

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1754-1773

Subventions

Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : R01 DK129350
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R35 GM122471
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : T32 GM141742
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© 2022 American Association for Anatomy.

Références

Dev Dyn. 2011 Jan;240(1):108-15
pubmed: 21117149
Methods Mol Biol. 2009;546:69-84
pubmed: 19378098
iScience. 2021 Feb 04;24(3):102142
pubmed: 33665561
Dev Dyn. 2011 Sep;240(9):2101-7
pubmed: 21805532
Science. 2016 Jan 29;351(6272):aad2197
pubmed: 26823433
Dev Dyn. 2004 Oct;231(2):449-59
pubmed: 15366023
Development. 2011 Jan;138(1):169-77
pubmed: 21138979
Nat Biotechnol. 2013 Mar;31(3):227-9
pubmed: 23360964
Nat Commun. 2015 Aug 26;6:8146
pubmed: 26306682
Nat Immunol. 2003 Dec;4(12):1238-46
pubmed: 14608381
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997 Aug 28;237(3):752-7
pubmed: 9299439
Dev Cell. 2011 May 17;20(5):713-24
pubmed: 21571227
Dev Cell. 2004 Jul;7(1):133-44
pubmed: 15239961
Gastroenterology. 2014 Mar;146(3):776-88
pubmed: 24148620
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 17;10(6):e0129072
pubmed: 26083735
Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Sep 28;46(17):e102
pubmed: 29905858
Cell. 2011 Oct 28;147(3):577-89
pubmed: 22036566
Development. 1997 Aug;124(15):2945-60
pubmed: 9247337
Nat Commun. 2019 Aug 26;10(1):3857
pubmed: 31451684
Biol Pharm Bull. 2005 Dec;28(12):2315-8
pubmed: 16327172
Nat Med. 1995 Jun;1(6):592-4
pubmed: 7585128
Genome Res. 2012 Oct;22(10):2043-53
pubmed: 22593555
Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Mar;42(5):e34
pubmed: 24304893
Nature. 2010 Mar 4;464(7285):108-11
pubmed: 20154733
Dev Cell. 2014 Jul 28;30(2):123-36
pubmed: 25017692
Dis Model Mech. 2019 Oct 17;12(10):
pubmed: 31515263
Trends Genet. 2018 May;34(5):362-378
pubmed: 29429760
PLoS One. 2009;4(2):e4640
pubmed: 19247481
Transgenic Res. 2011 Feb;20(1):183-9
pubmed: 20556509
Dev Dyn. 2007 Nov;236(11):3088-99
pubmed: 17937395
Front Biosci. 2006 Jan 01;11:1108-36
pubmed: 16146801
Dev Dyn. 2017 Jan;246(1):41-49
pubmed: 27666728
Dev Biol. 2017 Oct 15;430(2):385-396
pubmed: 28322738
Dev Biol. 2002 Aug 15;248(2):307-18
pubmed: 12167406
Zebrafish. 2011 Dec;8(4):211-9
pubmed: 21913856
Nucleic Acids Res. 1989 Feb 11;17(3):1215-30
pubmed: 2537950
Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Nov;8(11):4727-35
pubmed: 2463465
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Apr 26;102(17):6068-73
pubmed: 15827121
Mech Dev. 2002 Mar;112(1-2):213-5
pubmed: 11850198
Nat Methods. 2012 Jun 28;9(7):676-82
pubmed: 22743772
Development. 2011 Nov;138(22):4831-41
pubmed: 22007133
Cell Tissue Res. 2018 Apr;372(1):41-50
pubmed: 29435650
Mol Cell Biol. 1987 Jun;7(6):2087-96
pubmed: 3037344
Nat Commun. 2018 May 21;9(1):2001
pubmed: 29784942
Dev Dyn. 2003 Sep;228(1):30-40
pubmed: 12950077
Development. 2014 Oct;141(19):3807-18
pubmed: 25249466
Transgenic Res. 2008 Apr;17(2):265-79
pubmed: 17968670
Mol Cell Biol. 1985 May;5(5):949-56
pubmed: 2987683
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 14;11(4):e0152989
pubmed: 27077909
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Sep 1;106(35):14896-901
pubmed: 19706417
Dev Cell. 2004 Jan;6(1):7-28
pubmed: 14723844
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jul 13;107(28):12564-9
pubmed: 20538976
Nat Methods. 2015 Jun;12(6):535-40
pubmed: 25867848
Dev Dyn. 2013 Aug;242(8):949-963
pubmed: 23723152
Gene. 1996 Oct 10;175(1-2):179-85
pubmed: 8917096
Curr Protoc Mouse Biol. 2017 Mar 2;7(1):1-12
pubmed: 28252198
Dev Biol. 2001 Feb 15;230(2):278-301
pubmed: 11161578
Neuron. 2010 Nov 18;68(4):695-709
pubmed: 21092859
Zebrafish. 2013 Sep;10(3):259-63
pubmed: 23668932
Curr Biol. 2013 Jul 8;23(13):1221-7
pubmed: 23791730
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 29;104(22):9410-5
pubmed: 17517602
Development. 2014 Feb;141(3):715-24
pubmed: 24449846
Plant Mol Biol. 1992 Feb;18(4):675-89
pubmed: 1313711
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 May 10;108(19):7902-7
pubmed: 21464299
Genome Res. 2014 Jan;24(1):142-53
pubmed: 24179142
Elife. 2021 Nov 19;10:
pubmed: 34796872
Development. 2016 Jun 1;143(11):2025-37
pubmed: 27130213
Dev Growth Differ. 2013 Feb;55(2):282-300
pubmed: 23350700
Zebrafish. 2017 Aug;14(4):293-304
pubmed: 28394244
Sci Rep. 2014 Oct 08;4:6545
pubmed: 25293390
Genomics. 1995 Feb 10;25(3):674-81
pubmed: 7759102
Dev Biol. 1997 Dec 15;192(2):289-99
pubmed: 9441668
Nature. 2014 Aug 21;512(7514):319-23
pubmed: 25119047
Genesis. 2010 Feb;48(2):137-43
pubmed: 20094996

Auteurs

Robert L Lalonde (RL)

Department of Pediatrics, Section of Developmental Biology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

Cassie L Kemmler (CL)

Department of Pediatrics, Section of Developmental Biology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

Fréderike W Riemslagh (FW)

Department of Pediatrics, Section of Developmental Biology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

Andrew J Aman (AJ)

Department of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Department of Biology and Department of Cell Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.

Jelena Kresoja-Rakic (J)

Department of Pediatrics, Section of Developmental Biology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

Hannah R Moran (HR)

Department of Pediatrics, Section of Developmental Biology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

Susan Nieuwenhuize (S)

Department of Pediatrics, Section of Developmental Biology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

David M Parichy (DM)

Department of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Department of Biology and Department of Cell Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.

Alexa Burger (A)

Department of Pediatrics, Section of Developmental Biology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

Christian Mosimann (C)

Department of Pediatrics, Section of Developmental Biology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH