Patient preference for virtual versus in-person visits in neuromuscular clinical practice.
COVID-19
in-person
neuromuscular
preference
telemedicine
virtual
Journal
Muscle & nerve
ISSN: 1097-4598
Titre abrégé: Muscle Nerve
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7803146
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2022
08 2022
Historique:
revised:
15
05
2022
received:
11
04
2021
accepted:
16
05
2022
pubmed:
22
5
2022
medline:
23
7
2022
entrez:
21
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
It is unknown if patients with neuromuscular diseases prefer in-person or virtual telemedicine visits. We studied patient opinions and preference on virtual versus in-person visits, and the factors influencing such preferences. Telephone surveys, consisting of 11 questions, of patients from 10 neuromuscular centers were completed. Five hundred and twenty surveys were completed. Twenty-six percent of respondents preferred virtual visits, while 50% preferred in-person visits. Sixty-four percent reported physical interaction as "very important." For receiving a new diagnosis, 55% preferred in-person vs 35% reporting no preference. Forty percent were concerned about a lack of physical examination vs 20% who were concerned about evaluating vital signs. Eighty four percent reported virtual visits were sufficiently private. Sixty eight percent did not consider expenses a factor in their preference. Although 92% were comfortable with virtual communication technology, 55% preferred video communications, and 19% preferred phone calls. Visit preference was not significantly associated with gender, diagnosis, disease severity, or symptom management. Patients who were concerned about a lack of physical exam or assessment of vitals had significantly higher odds of selecting in-person visits than no preference. Although neither technology, privacy, nor finance burdened patients in our study, more patients preferred in-person visits than virtual visits and 40% were concerned about a lack of physical examination. Interactions that occur with in-person encounters had high importance for patients, reflecting differences in the perception of the patient-physician relationship between virtual and in-person visits.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35596667
doi: 10.1002/mus.27641
pmc: PMC9540760
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
142-147Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Muscle & Nerve published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
Neurology. 2020 Jun 16;94(24):1077-1087
pubmed: 32358217
Neurology. 2017 Sep 12;89(11):1152-1161
pubmed: 28814455
Neurol Clin Pract. 2021 Dec;11(6):484-496
pubmed: 34992956
Muscle Nerve. 2021 Sep;64(3):270-276
pubmed: 33959997
Neurol Clin Pract. 2017 Aug;7(4):283-295
pubmed: 28840919
Neurology. 2020 Jun 2;94(22):959-969
pubmed: 32284362
Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2017 Nov;18(7-8):555-561
pubmed: 28678542
Can J Neurol Sci. 2020 Sep;47(5):598-603
pubmed: 32434626
J Telemed Telecare. 2017 Jan;23(1):174-180
pubmed: 26656722
Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2018 Feb;19(1-2):143-148
pubmed: 29250986
Arch Med Sci. 2014 Oct 27;10(5):1047-51
pubmed: 25395959
J Consult Psychol. 1967 Jun;31(3):248-52
pubmed: 6046577
Disabil Health J. 2018 Apr;11(2):306-309
pubmed: 28967584
Neurology. 2020 May 26;94(21):903-904
pubmed: 32238505
Muscle Nerve. 2022 Aug;66(2):142-147
pubmed: 35596667