Perceptions of Australian cattle farmers regarding the impact of pinkeye on farm productivity and animal welfare.


Journal

Preventive veterinary medicine
ISSN: 1873-1716
Titre abrégé: Prev Vet Med
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8217463

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2022
Historique:
received: 05 12 2021
revised: 02 05 2022
accepted: 04 05 2022
pubmed: 22 5 2022
medline: 9 6 2022
entrez: 21 5 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Pinkeye (infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis, IBK) is an important disease of cattle worldwide. It has a substantial negative impact on farm productivity and is a major cost burden, but specific data on losses are lacking. This study was conducted to understand farmers' perceptions of the impact of pinkeye on farm productivity and animal welfare, and factors influencing the money farmers estimated spending on pinkeye in 2018. Data were collected by the first Australia-wide online survey on pinkeye. There were 1035 suitable responses analysed for impact on farm productivity. From these 82% of respondents represented farms in southern Australia, 58% reported cattle breeding as their main enterprise, and 89% bred animals on farm. Farmers were more likely to rank the impact of pinkeye on farm productivity as high if they had younger cattle, treated cattle with pinkeye more frequently, and as their herd size increased. Fewer farmers chose pinkeye as an animal welfare concern than as an economic and farm management issue, but overall animal welfare was rated by the greatest number of farmers as a high severity concern (n = 691), followed by decreased sale value and farm profits (n = 561). This suggests a shift in the equipoise between the economics of food animal production and animal welfare expectations. The median amount reportedly spent on pinkeye in 2018 by Australian farmers (n = 779) was $250.00 per farm. Farmers reported spending more money on pinkeye as herd size and number of cattle affected by pinkeye increased, their perception of pinkeye impact on farm productivity and animal welfare increased, if they treated pinkeye more frequently, reported higher fly worry, if their herds contained Angus cattle, if they bred on farm, and if they were located in southern Australian regions. Study findings should be used to better understand pinkeye, target expenditure, and improve outcomes for cattle and farmers.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35597103
pii: S0167-5877(22)00098-8
doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2022.105665
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

105665

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Mac Kneipp (M)

Sydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia.

Alexandra C Green (AC)

Sydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia.

Merran Govendir (M)

Sydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia.

Michael Laurence (M)

Murdoch University, School of Veterinary Medicine, College of Science, Health, Engineering and Education, 90 South Street, WA 6150, Australia.

Navneet K Dhand (NK)

Sydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia. Electronic address: navneet.dhand@sydney.edu.au.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH