Blood Pressure Variability Indices for Outcome Prediction After Thrombectomy in Stroke by Using High-Resolution Data.
Big data
Blood pressure
Critical care
Ischemic stroke
Thrombectomy
Journal
Neurocritical care
ISSN: 1556-0961
Titre abrégé: Neurocrit Care
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101156086
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2022
08 2022
Historique:
received:
30
11
2021
accepted:
11
04
2022
pubmed:
24
5
2022
medline:
4
8
2022
entrez:
23
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Blood pressure variability (BPV) is associated with outcome after endovascular thrombectomy in acute large vessel occlusion stroke. We aimed to provide the optimal sampling frequency and BPV index for outcome prediction by using high-resolution blood pressure (BP) data. Patient characteristics, 3-month outcome, and BP values measured intraarterially at 1 Hz for up to 24 h were extracted from 34 patients treated at a tertiary care center neurocritical care unit. Outcome was dichotomized (modified Rankin Scale 0-2, favorable, and 3-6, unfavorable) and associated with systolic BPV (as calculated by using standard deviation, coefficient of variation, averaged real variability, successive variation, number of trend changes, and a spectral approach using the power of specific BP frequencies). BP values were downsampled by either averaging or omitting all BP values within each prespecified time bin to compare the different sampling rates. Out of 34 patients (age 72 ± 12.7 years, 67.6% men), 10 (29.4%) achieved a favorable functional outcome and 24 (70.6%) had an unfavorable functional outcome at 3 months. No group differences were found in mean absolute systolic BP (SBP) (130 ± 18 mm Hg, p = 0.82) and diastolic BP (DBP) (59 ± 10 mm Hg, p = 1.00) during the monitoring time. BPV only reached predictive significance when using successive variation extracted from downsampled (averaged over 5 min) SBP data (median 4.8 mm Hg [range 3.8-7.1]) in patients with favorable versus 7.1 mmHg [range 5.5-9.7] in those with unfavorable outcome, area under the curve = 0.74 [confidence interval (CI) 0.57-0.85; p = 0.031], or the power of midrange frequencies between 1/20 and 1/5 min [area under the curve = 0.75 (CI 0.59-0.86), p = 0.020]. Using high-resolution BP data of 1 Hz, downsampling by averaging all BP values within 5-min intervals is essential to find relevant differences in systolic BPV, as noise can be avoided (confirmed by the significance of the power of midrange frequencies). These results demonstrate how high-resolution BP data can be processed for effective outcome prediction.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Blood pressure variability (BPV) is associated with outcome after endovascular thrombectomy in acute large vessel occlusion stroke. We aimed to provide the optimal sampling frequency and BPV index for outcome prediction by using high-resolution blood pressure (BP) data.
METHODS
Patient characteristics, 3-month outcome, and BP values measured intraarterially at 1 Hz for up to 24 h were extracted from 34 patients treated at a tertiary care center neurocritical care unit. Outcome was dichotomized (modified Rankin Scale 0-2, favorable, and 3-6, unfavorable) and associated with systolic BPV (as calculated by using standard deviation, coefficient of variation, averaged real variability, successive variation, number of trend changes, and a spectral approach using the power of specific BP frequencies). BP values were downsampled by either averaging or omitting all BP values within each prespecified time bin to compare the different sampling rates.
RESULTS
Out of 34 patients (age 72 ± 12.7 years, 67.6% men), 10 (29.4%) achieved a favorable functional outcome and 24 (70.6%) had an unfavorable functional outcome at 3 months. No group differences were found in mean absolute systolic BP (SBP) (130 ± 18 mm Hg, p = 0.82) and diastolic BP (DBP) (59 ± 10 mm Hg, p = 1.00) during the monitoring time. BPV only reached predictive significance when using successive variation extracted from downsampled (averaged over 5 min) SBP data (median 4.8 mm Hg [range 3.8-7.1]) in patients with favorable versus 7.1 mmHg [range 5.5-9.7] in those with unfavorable outcome, area under the curve = 0.74 [confidence interval (CI) 0.57-0.85; p = 0.031], or the power of midrange frequencies between 1/20 and 1/5 min [area under the curve = 0.75 (CI 0.59-0.86), p = 0.020].
CONCLUSIONS
Using high-resolution BP data of 1 Hz, downsampling by averaging all BP values within 5-min intervals is essential to find relevant differences in systolic BPV, as noise can be avoided (confirmed by the significance of the power of midrange frequencies). These results demonstrate how high-resolution BP data can be processed for effective outcome prediction.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35606560
doi: 10.1007/s12028-022-01519-x
pii: 10.1007/s12028-022-01519-x
pmc: PMC9343264
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
220-229Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Eur Neurol. 2018;80(1-2):63-67
pubmed: 30227441
Stat Med. 2006 Feb 28;25(4):559-73
pubmed: 16217835
Front Neurol. 2017 Jul 03;8:317
pubmed: 28717354
Annu Rev Physiol. 1969;31:675-725
pubmed: 4885778
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2003;16(1):69-75
pubmed: 12766365
Neurology. 2017 Aug 8;89(6):540-547
pubmed: 28687721
Stroke. 2013 Mar;44(3):816-8
pubmed: 23329210
Stroke. 2009 Jul;40(7):2442-9
pubmed: 19461022
Stroke. 2018 Jul;49(7):1784-1790
pubmed: 29895536
J Neurointerv Surg. 2018 Sep;10(9):823-827
pubmed: 29352059
Clin Physiol. 1987 Oct;7(5):389-401
pubmed: 3665397
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2018 May 21;20(8):37
pubmed: 29785667
Stroke. 2018 Mar;49(3):e46-e110
pubmed: 29367334
BMJ. 2016 Aug 09;354:i4098
pubmed: 27511067
Hypertension. 1995 Jun;25(6):1276-86
pubmed: 7768574
Neurology. 2008 Aug 19;71(8):552-8
pubmed: 18550860
J Hypertens. 2005 Mar;23(3):505-11
pubmed: 15716690
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2017 Feb 24;2(1):1-6
pubmed: 28959484
Stroke. 2020 Feb;51(2):511-518
pubmed: 31813361
Lancet. 2019 Mar 2;393(10174):877-888
pubmed: 30739745
Am J Hypertens. 1993 Jun;6(6 Pt 2):184S-187S
pubmed: 8347315
J Hypertens. 2017 Mar;35(3):421-441
pubmed: 27977471
Eur J Neurosci. 2000 Jan;12(1):58-66
pubmed: 10651860
J Hypertens. 2013 Aug;31(8):1629-36
pubmed: 23751963
J Healthc Eng. 2019 Nov 3;2019:5930379
pubmed: 31885832
BMC Neurol. 2019 Sep 26;19(1):228
pubmed: 31558167
Stroke. 2015 Sep;46(9):2482-90
pubmed: 26243226
Int J Stroke. 2019 Apr;14(3):321-328
pubmed: 30418098
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2007 Apr;34(4):362-8
pubmed: 17324151