Cross-species discrimination of vocal expression of emotional valence by Equidae and Suidae.
Emotional contagion
Horses
Pigs
Przewalski’s horse
Vocal communication
Wild boars
Journal
BMC biology
ISSN: 1741-7007
Titre abrégé: BMC Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101190720
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 05 2022
24 05 2022
Historique:
received:
03
06
2021
accepted:
25
04
2022
entrez:
23
5
2022
pubmed:
24
5
2022
medline:
26
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Discrimination and perception of emotion expression regulate interactions between conspecifics and can lead to emotional contagion (state matching between producer and receiver) or to more complex forms of empathy (e.g., sympathetic concern). Empathy processes are enhanced by familiarity and physical similarity between partners. Since heterospecifics can also be familiar with each other to some extent, discrimination/perception of emotions and, as a result, emotional contagion could also occur between species. Here, we investigated if four species belonging to two ungulate Families, Equidae (domestic and Przewalski's horses) and Suidae (pigs and wild boars), can discriminate between vocalizations of opposite emotional valence (positive or negative), produced not only by conspecifics, but also closely related heterospecifics and humans. To this aim, we played back to individuals of these four species, which were all habituated to humans, vocalizations from a unique set of recordings for which the valence associated with vocal production was known. We found that domestic and Przewalski's horses, as well as pigs, but not wild boars, reacted more strongly when the first vocalization played was negative compared to positive, regardless of the species broadcasted. Domestic horses, Przewalski's horses and pigs thus seem to discriminate between positive and negative vocalizations produced not only by conspecifics, but also by heterospecifics, including humans. In addition, we found an absence of difference between the strength of reaction of the four species to the calls of conspecifics and closely related heterospecifics, which could be related to similarities in the general structure of their vocalization. Overall, our results suggest that phylogeny and domestication have played a role in cross-species discrimination/perception of emotions.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Discrimination and perception of emotion expression regulate interactions between conspecifics and can lead to emotional contagion (state matching between producer and receiver) or to more complex forms of empathy (e.g., sympathetic concern). Empathy processes are enhanced by familiarity and physical similarity between partners. Since heterospecifics can also be familiar with each other to some extent, discrimination/perception of emotions and, as a result, emotional contagion could also occur between species.
RESULTS
Here, we investigated if four species belonging to two ungulate Families, Equidae (domestic and Przewalski's horses) and Suidae (pigs and wild boars), can discriminate between vocalizations of opposite emotional valence (positive or negative), produced not only by conspecifics, but also closely related heterospecifics and humans. To this aim, we played back to individuals of these four species, which were all habituated to humans, vocalizations from a unique set of recordings for which the valence associated with vocal production was known. We found that domestic and Przewalski's horses, as well as pigs, but not wild boars, reacted more strongly when the first vocalization played was negative compared to positive, regardless of the species broadcasted.
CONCLUSIONS
Domestic horses, Przewalski's horses and pigs thus seem to discriminate between positive and negative vocalizations produced not only by conspecifics, but also by heterospecifics, including humans. In addition, we found an absence of difference between the strength of reaction of the four species to the calls of conspecifics and closely related heterospecifics, which could be related to similarities in the general structure of their vocalization. Overall, our results suggest that phylogeny and domestication have played a role in cross-species discrimination/perception of emotions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35606806
doi: 10.1186/s12915-022-01311-5
pii: 10.1186/s12915-022-01311-5
pmc: PMC9128205
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
106Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Animals (Basel). 2018 Jun 05;8(6):
pubmed: 29874830
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Aug 27;116(35):17231-17238
pubmed: 31405970
Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2011 Jan;65(1):47-55
pubmed: 21297852
Animals (Basel). 2020 Jun 28;10(7):
pubmed: 32605256
Biol Lett. 2016 Jan;12(1):20150883
pubmed: 26763220
Curr Biol. 2017 Apr 24;27(8):1248-1249
pubmed: 28392111
Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59:279-300
pubmed: 17550343
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 16;7(1):8437
pubmed: 28814756
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 18;7(1):8779
pubmed: 28821880
Behav Neurosci. 2007 Dec;121(6):1145-55
pubmed: 18085867
Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 21;8(1):8660
pubmed: 29930289
Science. 2018 Apr 06;360(6384):111-114
pubmed: 29472442
Genet Sel Evol. 2016 Mar 29;48:23
pubmed: 27025270
Physiol Behav. 2013 Jan 17;109:42-50
pubmed: 23159725
Biol Lett. 2014 Jan 08;10(1):20130926
pubmed: 24402716
Emotion. 2012 Oct;12(5):1161-79
pubmed: 22081890
Behav Brain Sci. 2002 Feb;25(1):1-20; discussion 20-71
pubmed: 12625087
R Soc Open Sci. 2018 Mar 7;5(3):172099
pubmed: 29657805
R Soc Open Sci. 2018 Aug 29;5(8):180491
pubmed: 30225038
Mol Biol Evol. 2017 Jul 1;34(7):1812-1819
pubmed: 28387841
Curr Biol. 2015 Oct 5;25(19):2577-83
pubmed: 26412128
Anim Cogn. 2016 May;19(3):501-11
pubmed: 26753689
Nat Methods. 2009 Apr;6(4):257-61
pubmed: 19333241
Am J Primatol. 2013 Jul;75(7):643-63
pubmed: 23592340
Anim Cogn. 2017 Jul;20(4):703-715
pubmed: 28432495
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 12;9(3):e91192
pubmed: 24621604
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006 Dec 29;361(1476):2155-72
pubmed: 17118930
Animals (Basel). 2019 Oct 24;9(11):
pubmed: 31653088
PeerJ. 2014 Aug 12;2:e519
pubmed: 25165630
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 13;8(8):e71841
pubmed: 23967251
Science. 2006 Jun 30;312(5782):1967-70
pubmed: 16809545
Curr Biol. 2014 Mar 3;24(5):574-8
pubmed: 24560578
Anim Cogn. 2022 Apr;25(2):369-384
pubmed: 34476652
Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 29;8(1):13052
pubmed: 30158532
Curr Biol. 2018 May 7;28(9):1428-1432.e4
pubmed: 29706519
J Acoust Soc Am. 2019 May;145(5):2895
pubmed: 31153321
Sci Rep. 2015 Apr 21;4:9989
pubmed: 25897781
Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2018 Aug;205:202-209
pubmed: 30078924
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 Jun;113:273-286
pubmed: 31982603
J Comp Psychol. 2003 Mar;117(1):44-52
pubmed: 12735363
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Jul 26;284(1859):
pubmed: 28747478