Patient preferences and experiences of participation in surgical cancer care.
cancer care
involvement
patient participation
patient preferences
person-centered care
surgical care
Journal
Worldviews on evidence-based nursing
ISSN: 1741-6787
Titre abrégé: Worldviews Evid Based Nurs
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101185267
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2022
Oct 2022
Historique:
revised:
11
02
2022
received:
03
12
2021
accepted:
26
02
2022
pubmed:
25
5
2022
medline:
19
10
2022
entrez:
24
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Quality cancer care necessitates opportunities for patient participation, supposedly recognizing the individual's preferences and experiences for being involved in their health and healthcare issues. Previous research shows that surgical cancer patients wish to be more involved, requiring professionals to be sensitive of patients' needs. To explore preference-based patient participation in surgical cancer care. A cross-sectional study was conducted. The Patient Preferences for Patient Participation tool (4Ps) was used, which includes 12 attributes of preferences for and experiences of patient participation. Data were analyzed with descriptive and comparative statistical methods. The results are based on a total of 101 questionnaires. Having reciprocal communication and being listened to by healthcare staff were commonly deemed crucial for patient participation. While 60% of the patients suggested that taking part in planning was crucial for their participation, they had experienced this only to some extent. Learning to manage symptoms and phrasing personal goals were items most often representing insufficient conditions for preference-based patient participation. To support person-centered surgical care, further efforts to suffice preference-based participation are needed, including opportunities for patients to share their experiences and engage in the planning of healthcare activities.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Quality cancer care necessitates opportunities for patient participation, supposedly recognizing the individual's preferences and experiences for being involved in their health and healthcare issues. Previous research shows that surgical cancer patients wish to be more involved, requiring professionals to be sensitive of patients' needs.
AIMS
OBJECTIVE
To explore preference-based patient participation in surgical cancer care.
METHODS
METHODS
A cross-sectional study was conducted. The Patient Preferences for Patient Participation tool (4Ps) was used, which includes 12 attributes of preferences for and experiences of patient participation. Data were analyzed with descriptive and comparative statistical methods.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The results are based on a total of 101 questionnaires. Having reciprocal communication and being listened to by healthcare staff were commonly deemed crucial for patient participation. While 60% of the patients suggested that taking part in planning was crucial for their participation, they had experienced this only to some extent. Learning to manage symptoms and phrasing personal goals were items most often representing insufficient conditions for preference-based patient participation.
LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION
CONCLUSIONS
To support person-centered surgical care, further efforts to suffice preference-based participation are needed, including opportunities for patients to share their experiences and engage in the planning of healthcare activities.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
405-414Subventions
Organisme : Forskningsrådet i Sydöstra Sverige
Organisme : Medical Research Council of Southeast Sweden
ID : FORSS-862001
Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Worldviews on Evidence-based Nursing published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Sigma Theta Tau International.
Références
JAMA Surg. 2021 Jan 1;156(1):e205002
pubmed: 33146682
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Jul;100(7):1247-1257
pubmed: 28238421
Psychooncology. 2019 Feb;28(2):423-429
pubmed: 30548100
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 Mar;28(2):e12959
pubmed: 30408839
Psychol Health Med. 2020 Feb;25(2):252-258
pubmed: 31795738
J Adv Nurs. 1996 Sep;24(3):561-71
pubmed: 8876417
Scand J Caring Sci. 2019 Mar;33(1):244-251
pubmed: 30070390
Health Expect. 2021 Oct;24(5):1833-1841
pubmed: 34337836
Ann Surg. 2008 Aug;248(2):189-98
pubmed: 18650627
Support Care Cancer. 2019 Jul;27(7):2561-2567
pubmed: 30430301
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Jul;100(7):1245-1246
pubmed: 28595771
Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):2522-35
pubmed: 24938672
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2020 Dec 16;6(1):e12113
pubmed: 33344753
Nurs Health Sci. 2020 Jun;22(2):427-435
pubmed: 31943719
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 Jul;28(4):e13071
pubmed: 31050065
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2019 Mar;18(3):185-193
pubmed: 30277807
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Aug;101(8):1337-1350
pubmed: 29551564
Nurs Forum. 2019 Jul;54(3):315-327
pubmed: 30793314
J Eval Clin Pract. 2019 Dec;25(6):1070-1073
pubmed: 30916440
Scand J Caring Sci. 2021 Mar;35(1):96-103
pubmed: 32004397
Mayo Clin Proc. 2010 Jan;85(1):53-62
pubmed: 20042562
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4
pubmed: 24141714
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2022 Oct;19(5):405-414
pubmed: 35607906
HPB (Oxford). 2020 Feb;22(2):265-274
pubmed: 31501009
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jun 17;8(6):e17855
pubmed: 32554375
Health Expect. 2019 Dec;22(6):1285-1293
pubmed: 31560830
Nurs Res Pract. 2011;2011:534060
pubmed: 21994832
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022 Jan;31(1):e13534
pubmed: 34729832
Int J Nurs Terminol Classif. 2010 Jan-Mar;21(1):21-32
pubmed: 20132355
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jul 29;20(1):702
pubmed: 32727451
Psychooncology. 2021 Oct;30(10):1663-1679
pubmed: 34146446
J Adv Nurs. 2020 Aug;76(8):1988-2004
pubmed: 32350898
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Jul;27(13-14):2904-2916
pubmed: 29446494
Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014 Jan;16(1):e12454
pubmed: 24719703
Nurs Forum. 2008 Jan-Mar;43(1):2-11
pubmed: 18269439
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Dec;99(12):1923-1939
pubmed: 27450481