Safety and performance of a novel cerebral embolic protection device for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the PROTEMBO C Trial.


Journal

EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology
ISSN: 1969-6213
Titre abrégé: EuroIntervention
Pays: France
ID NLM: 101251040

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 Sep 2022
Historique:
pubmed: 25 5 2022
medline: 24 9 2022
entrez: 24 5 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Stroke remains a feared complication associated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Embolic cerebral injury occurs in the majority of TAVI cases and can lead to cognitive dysfunction. The PROTEMBO C Trial evaluated the safety and performance of the ProtEmbo Cerebral Protection System in TAVI patients. Forty-one patients were enrolled in this single-arm study conducted at 8 European centres. The primary safety endpoint was the rate of VARC 2-defined major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at 30 days; the primary performance endpoint was the composite rate of technical success versus performance goals (PG). Secondary endpoints included brain diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI), new lesion volume, and the rate of death or all strokes compared to historical data. Thirty-seven of 41 enrolled patients underwent TAVI with the ProtEmbo device (intention-to-treat [ITT] population). Both primary endpoints were met. MACCE at 30 days was 8.1% (upper limit of the 95% confidence interval [CI]: 21.3% vs PG 25%; p=0.009), and technical success was 94.6% (lower limit of the 95% CI: 82.3% vs PG 75%; p=0.003). New DW-MRI lesion volumes with ProtEmbo were smaller than in historical data, and 87% of patients completing MRI follow-up had no single lesion >150 mm The PROTEMBO C Trial met its primary safety and performance endpoints compared to prespecified historical PGs. Patients had smaller brain lesion volumes on DW-MRI compared to prior series and no larger single lesions. These results warrant further evaluation of the ProtEmbo in a larger randomised controlled trial (RCT).

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Stroke remains a feared complication associated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Embolic cerebral injury occurs in the majority of TAVI cases and can lead to cognitive dysfunction.
AIMS OBJECTIVE
The PROTEMBO C Trial evaluated the safety and performance of the ProtEmbo Cerebral Protection System in TAVI patients.
METHODS METHODS
Forty-one patients were enrolled in this single-arm study conducted at 8 European centres. The primary safety endpoint was the rate of VARC 2-defined major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at 30 days; the primary performance endpoint was the composite rate of technical success versus performance goals (PG). Secondary endpoints included brain diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI), new lesion volume, and the rate of death or all strokes compared to historical data.
RESULTS RESULTS
Thirty-seven of 41 enrolled patients underwent TAVI with the ProtEmbo device (intention-to-treat [ITT] population). Both primary endpoints were met. MACCE at 30 days was 8.1% (upper limit of the 95% confidence interval [CI]: 21.3% vs PG 25%; p=0.009), and technical success was 94.6% (lower limit of the 95% CI: 82.3% vs PG 75%; p=0.003). New DW-MRI lesion volumes with ProtEmbo were smaller than in historical data, and 87% of patients completing MRI follow-up had no single lesion >150 mm
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The PROTEMBO C Trial met its primary safety and performance endpoints compared to prespecified historical PGs. Patients had smaller brain lesion volumes on DW-MRI compared to prior series and no larger single lesions. These results warrant further evaluation of the ProtEmbo in a larger randomised controlled trial (RCT).

Identifiants

pubmed: 35608032
pii: EIJ-D-22-00238
doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00238
pmc: PMC10241272
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Clinical Trial Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

590-597

Références

N Engl J Med. 2010 Oct 21;363(17):1597-607
pubmed: 20961243
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 2;380(18):1695-1705
pubmed: 30883058
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2021 Aug;19(8):725-737
pubmed: 34263701
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Mar;12(3):e007546
pubmed: 30871358
Heart. 2012 Jan;98(1):18-23
pubmed: 21737581
J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Sep 21;4(9):e002096
pubmed: 26391132
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Nov;3(11):1126-32
pubmed: 21087747
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Nov 10;5(11):
pubmed: 27930358
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Feb 25;12(4):362-369
pubmed: 30784641
Circulation. 2013 Jun 4;127(22):2194-201
pubmed: 23652860
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 2;380(18):1706-1715
pubmed: 30883053
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Nov 1;98(5):959-968
pubmed: 34145716
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Apr 6;55(14):1427-32
pubmed: 20188503
Circulation. 2010 Feb 23;121(7):870-8
pubmed: 20177005
Circulation. 2021 Jun 8;143(23):2229-2240
pubmed: 33619968
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Jan;145(1):6-23
pubmed: 23084102
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2018 Jan;15(1):95-104
pubmed: 29434631
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021 Sep;30(9):105927
pubmed: 34252826
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Nov 24;76(21):2492-2516
pubmed: 33213729
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Oct 28;12(20):2112
pubmed: 31648768
Lancet Neurol. 2004 Jan;3(1):39-45
pubmed: 14693110
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Aug 24;78(8):794-806
pubmed: 34412813
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Sep 10;11(17):1683-1693
pubmed: 30154060
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Jan 31;69(4):367-377
pubmed: 27815101
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jul 9;11(13):1262-1273
pubmed: 29976363
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Mar 8;14(5):515-527
pubmed: 33663779
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 Mar;36:9-13
pubmed: 34024747
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Feb 14;69(6):679-691
pubmed: 28183511

Auteurs

Dariusz Jagielak (D)

Department of Cardiac & Vascular Surgery, Uniwersyteckie Centrum Kliniczne, Gdansk, Poland.

Radoslaw Targonski (R)

Department of Cardiac & Vascular Surgery, Uniwersyteckie Centrum Kliniczne, Gdansk, Poland.

Christian Frerker (C)

Universitätsklinikum Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.

Mohamed Abdel-Wahab (M)

Heart Center Leipzig, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Johannes Wilde (J)

Heart Center Leipzig, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Nikos Werner (N)

Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder Trier, Trier, Germany.

Michael Lauterbach (M)

Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder Trier, Trier, Germany.

Juergen Leick (J)

Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder Trier, Trier, Germany.

Marek Grygier (M)

1st Department of Cardiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.

Marcin Misterski (M)

1st Department of Cardiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.

Andrejs Erglis (A)

Pauls Stradiņš Clinical University Hospital, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia.

Inga Narbute (I)

Pauls Stradiņš Clinical University Hospital, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia.

Adam Ryszard Witkowski (AR)

National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland.

Matti Adam (M)

University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Derk Frank (D)

UKSH University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
DZHK Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Germany.

Fernando Gatto (F)

HerzZentrum Saar, Völklingen, Germany.

Tobias Schmidt (T)

Universitätsklinikum Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.

Alexandra J Lansky (AJ)

Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH