Safety and performance of a novel cerebral embolic protection device for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the PROTEMBO C Trial.
Journal
EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology
ISSN: 1969-6213
Titre abrégé: EuroIntervention
Pays: France
ID NLM: 101251040
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 Sep 2022
20 Sep 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
25
5
2022
medline:
24
9
2022
entrez:
24
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Stroke remains a feared complication associated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Embolic cerebral injury occurs in the majority of TAVI cases and can lead to cognitive dysfunction. The PROTEMBO C Trial evaluated the safety and performance of the ProtEmbo Cerebral Protection System in TAVI patients. Forty-one patients were enrolled in this single-arm study conducted at 8 European centres. The primary safety endpoint was the rate of VARC 2-defined major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at 30 days; the primary performance endpoint was the composite rate of technical success versus performance goals (PG). Secondary endpoints included brain diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI), new lesion volume, and the rate of death or all strokes compared to historical data. Thirty-seven of 41 enrolled patients underwent TAVI with the ProtEmbo device (intention-to-treat [ITT] population). Both primary endpoints were met. MACCE at 30 days was 8.1% (upper limit of the 95% confidence interval [CI]: 21.3% vs PG 25%; p=0.009), and technical success was 94.6% (lower limit of the 95% CI: 82.3% vs PG 75%; p=0.003). New DW-MRI lesion volumes with ProtEmbo were smaller than in historical data, and 87% of patients completing MRI follow-up had no single lesion >150 mm The PROTEMBO C Trial met its primary safety and performance endpoints compared to prespecified historical PGs. Patients had smaller brain lesion volumes on DW-MRI compared to prior series and no larger single lesions. These results warrant further evaluation of the ProtEmbo in a larger randomised controlled trial (RCT).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Stroke remains a feared complication associated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Embolic cerebral injury occurs in the majority of TAVI cases and can lead to cognitive dysfunction.
AIMS
OBJECTIVE
The PROTEMBO C Trial evaluated the safety and performance of the ProtEmbo Cerebral Protection System in TAVI patients.
METHODS
METHODS
Forty-one patients were enrolled in this single-arm study conducted at 8 European centres. The primary safety endpoint was the rate of VARC 2-defined major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at 30 days; the primary performance endpoint was the composite rate of technical success versus performance goals (PG). Secondary endpoints included brain diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI), new lesion volume, and the rate of death or all strokes compared to historical data.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Thirty-seven of 41 enrolled patients underwent TAVI with the ProtEmbo device (intention-to-treat [ITT] population). Both primary endpoints were met. MACCE at 30 days was 8.1% (upper limit of the 95% confidence interval [CI]: 21.3% vs PG 25%; p=0.009), and technical success was 94.6% (lower limit of the 95% CI: 82.3% vs PG 75%; p=0.003). New DW-MRI lesion volumes with ProtEmbo were smaller than in historical data, and 87% of patients completing MRI follow-up had no single lesion >150 mm
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The PROTEMBO C Trial met its primary safety and performance endpoints compared to prespecified historical PGs. Patients had smaller brain lesion volumes on DW-MRI compared to prior series and no larger single lesions. These results warrant further evaluation of the ProtEmbo in a larger randomised controlled trial (RCT).
Identifiants
pubmed: 35608032
pii: EIJ-D-22-00238
doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00238
pmc: PMC10241272
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
590-597Références
N Engl J Med. 2010 Oct 21;363(17):1597-607
pubmed: 20961243
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 2;380(18):1695-1705
pubmed: 30883058
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2021 Aug;19(8):725-737
pubmed: 34263701
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Mar;12(3):e007546
pubmed: 30871358
Heart. 2012 Jan;98(1):18-23
pubmed: 21737581
J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Sep 21;4(9):e002096
pubmed: 26391132
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Nov;3(11):1126-32
pubmed: 21087747
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Nov 10;5(11):
pubmed: 27930358
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Feb 25;12(4):362-369
pubmed: 30784641
Circulation. 2013 Jun 4;127(22):2194-201
pubmed: 23652860
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 2;380(18):1706-1715
pubmed: 30883053
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Nov 1;98(5):959-968
pubmed: 34145716
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Apr 6;55(14):1427-32
pubmed: 20188503
Circulation. 2010 Feb 23;121(7):870-8
pubmed: 20177005
Circulation. 2021 Jun 8;143(23):2229-2240
pubmed: 33619968
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Jan;145(1):6-23
pubmed: 23084102
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2018 Jan;15(1):95-104
pubmed: 29434631
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021 Sep;30(9):105927
pubmed: 34252826
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Nov 24;76(21):2492-2516
pubmed: 33213729
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Oct 28;12(20):2112
pubmed: 31648768
Lancet Neurol. 2004 Jan;3(1):39-45
pubmed: 14693110
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Aug 24;78(8):794-806
pubmed: 34412813
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Sep 10;11(17):1683-1693
pubmed: 30154060
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Jan 31;69(4):367-377
pubmed: 27815101
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jul 9;11(13):1262-1273
pubmed: 29976363
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Mar 8;14(5):515-527
pubmed: 33663779
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 Mar;36:9-13
pubmed: 34024747
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Feb 14;69(6):679-691
pubmed: 28183511