Recommendations for cardiovascular magnetic resonance and computed tomography in congenital heart disease: a consensus paper from the CMR/CCT working group of the Italian Society of Pediatric Cardiology (SICP) and the Italian College of Cardiac Radiology endorsed by the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM) Part I.
Cardiovascular computed tomography
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance
Congenital heart disease
Multimodality imaging
Pediatric cardiology
Journal
La Radiologia medica
ISSN: 1826-6983
Titre abrégé: Radiol Med
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 0177625
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2022
Jul 2022
Historique:
received:
09
12
2021
accepted:
23
03
2022
pubmed:
25
5
2022
medline:
27
7
2022
entrez:
24
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and computed tomography (CCT) are advanced imaging modalities that recently revolutionized the conventional diagnostic approach to congenital heart diseases (CHD), supporting echocardiography and often replacing cardiac catheterization. Nevertheless, correct execution and interpretation require in-depth knowledge of all technical and clinical aspects of CHD, a careful assessment of risks and benefits before each exam, proper imaging protocols to maximize diagnostic information, minimizing harm. This position paper, written by experts from the Working Group of the Italian Society of Pediatric Cardiology and from the Italian College of Cardiac Radiology of the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology, is intended as a practical guide for applying CCT and CMR in children and adults with CHD, wishing to support Radiologists, Pediatricians, Cardiologists and Cardiac Surgeons in the multimodality diagnostic approach to these patients. The first part provides a review of the most relevant literature in the field, describes each modality's advantage and drawback, making considerations on the main applications, image quality, and safety issues. The second part focuses on clinical indications and appropriateness criteria for CMR and CCT, considering the level of CHD complexity, the clinical and logistic setting and the operator expertise.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35608758
doi: 10.1007/s11547-022-01490-9
pii: 10.1007/s11547-022-01490-9
pmc: PMC9308607
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
788-802Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Baumgartner H, De Backer J, Babu-Narayan SV et al (2021) 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of adult congenital heart disease. Eur Heart J 42:563–645. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa554
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa554
pubmed: 32860028
Ntsinjana HN, Hughes ML, Taylor AM (2011) The role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in pediatric congenital heart disease. J. Cardiovasc Magn Reson 13:66
doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-13-51
Orwat S, Diller G-P, Baumgartner H (2014) Imaging of congenital heart disease in adults: choice of modalities. Eur Hear J Cardiovasc Imaging 15:6–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jet124
doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jet124
Tworetzky W, McElhinney DB, Brook MM et al (1999) Echocardiographic diagnosis alone for the complete repair of major congenital heart defects. J Am Coll Cardiol 33:228–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(98)00518-X
doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(98)00518-X
pubmed: 9935035
Di Salvo G, Miller O, Babu Narayan S et al (2018) Imaging the adult with congenital heart disease: a multimodality imaging approach—position paper from the EACVI. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 19:1077–1098. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jey102
doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jey102
pubmed: 30084968
Higgins CB, Byrd BF, Farmer DW et al (1984) Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with congenital heart disease. Circulation 70:851–860. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.70.5.851
doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.70.5.851
pubmed: 6488498
Sechtem U, Neubauer S, Revel D, De Roos A, Van Rossum A, Von Schulthess G, Sieverding L, Van Der Wall E (1998) The clinical role of magnetic resonance in cardiovascular disease. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology, in collaboration with the Association of European Paediatric Cardiologists. Eur Heart J 19:19–39
doi: 10.1053/euhj.1997.0787
Pontone G, Di Cesare E, Castelletti S et al (2021) Appropriate use criteria for cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR): SIC—SIRM position paper part 1 (ischemic and congenital heart diseases, cardio-oncology, cardiac masses and heart transplant). Radiol Medica 126:365–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-020-01332-6
doi: 10.1007/s11547-020-01332-6
Valsangiacomo Buechel ER, Grosse-Wortmann L, Fratz S et al (2015) Indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance in children with congenital and acquired heart disease: an expert consensus paper of the Imaging Working Group of the AEPC and the Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Section of the EACVI. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 16:281–297. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeu129
doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeu129
pubmed: 25712078
Han BK, Rigsby CK, Hlavacek A et al (2015) Computed tomography imaging in patients with congenital heart disease part I: rationale and utility. An expert consensus document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT). Endorsed by the Society of Pediatric Radiology (SPR) and the Nor. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 9:475–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2015.07.004
doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2015.07.004
pubmed: 26272851
Han BK, Rigsby CK, Leipsic J et al (2015) Computed tomography imaging in patients with congenital heart disease, part 2: technical recommendations. An expert consensus document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT). Endorsed by the Society of Pediatric Radiology (SPR) and th. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 9:493–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2015.07.007
doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2015.07.007
pubmed: 26679548
Warnes CA, Williams RG, Bashore TM et al (2008) ACC/AHA 2008 guidelines for the management of adults with congenital heart disease: executive summary—a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (writing committee to develop guidelines fo. Circulation 118:2395–2451
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.190811
Stout KK, Daniels CJ, Aboulhosn JA et al (2019) 2018 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of adults with congenital heart disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation 139:e637–e697. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000602
doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000602
pubmed: 30586768
Sachdeva R, Valente AM, Armstrong AK et al (2020) ACC/AHA/ASE/HRS/ISACHD/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/SOPE 2020 appropriate use criteria for multimodality imaging during the follow-up care of patients with congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 75:657–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.10.002
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.10.002
pubmed: 31918898
Esposito A, Francone M, Andreini D et al (2021) SIRM-SIC appropriateness criteria for the use of Cardiac Computed Tomography. Part 1: Congenital heart diseases, primary prevention, risk assessment before surgery, suspected CAD in symptomatic patients, plaque and epicardial adipose tissue characterization, and functional assessment of stenosis. Radiol Med 126(9):1236–1248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-021-01378-0
doi: 10.1007/s11547-021-01378-0
pubmed: 34160775
pmcid: 8370938
Luijnenburg SE, Robbers-Visser D, Moelker A et al (2010) Intra-observer and interobserver variability of biventricular function, volumes and mass in patients with congenital heart disease measured by CMR imaging. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 26:57–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-009-9501-y
doi: 10.1007/s10554-009-9501-y
pubmed: 19757150
Sharma A, Einstein AJ, Vallakati A et al (2014) Meta-analysis of global left ventricular function comparing multidetector computed tomography with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Cardiol 113:731–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.11.016
doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.11.016
pubmed: 24355312
Kilner PJ, Geva T, Kaemmerer H, Trindade PT, Schwitter J, Webb GD (2010) Recommendations for cardiovascular magnetic resonance in adults with congenital heart disease from the respective working groups of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 31:794–805. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehp586
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp586
pubmed: 20067914
pmcid: 2848324
Babu-Narayan SV, Giannakoulas G, Valente AM et al (2016) Imaging of congenital heart disease in adults. Eur Heart J 37:1182–1195. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv519
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv519
pubmed: 26424866
Powell AJ, Geva T (2000) Blood flow measurement by magnetic resonance imaging in congenital heart disease. Pediatr Cardiol 21:47–58
doi: 10.1007/s002469910007
Fratz S, Chung T, Greil GF et al (2013) Guidelines and protocols for cardiovascular magnetic resonance in children and adults with congenital heart disease: SCMR expert consensus group on congenital heart disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 15:66. https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-15-51
doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-15-51
Picano E, Vañó E, Rehani MM et al (2014) The appropriate and justified use of medical radiation in cardiovascular imaging: a position document of the ESC Associations of Cardiovascular Imaging, Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions and Electrophysiology. Eur Heart J 35:665–672. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht394
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht394
pubmed: 24401558
Knuuti J, Bengel F, Bax JJ et al (2014) Risks and benefits of cardiac imaging: an analysis of risks related to imaging for coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 35:633–638. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht512
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht512
pubmed: 24375074
Sasaki T, Hansford R, Zviman MM et al (2011) Quantitative assessment of artifacts on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging of patients with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 4:662–670. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.111.965764
doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.111.965764
pubmed: 21946701
pmcid: 3218212
Garg R, Powell AJ, Sena L et al (2005) Effects of metallic implants on magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of Fontan palliation. Am J Cardiol 95:688–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.10.053
doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.10.053
pubmed: 15721124
Nazarian S, Hansford R, Rahsepar AA et al (2017) Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac devices. N Engl J Med 377:2555–2564. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1604267
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1604267
pubmed: 29281579
pmcid: 5894885
Nazarian S, Beinart R, Halperin HR (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging and implantable devices. Circ Arrhythmia Electrophysiol 6:419–428. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.113.000116
doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.000116
Salerno M, Sharif B, Arheden H et al (2017) Recent advances in cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 10:e003951. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.003951
doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.003951
pubmed: 28611116
pmcid: 5777859
Banka P, Geva T (2016) Advances in pediatric cardiac MRI. Curr Opin Pediatr 28:575–583. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0000000000000400
doi: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000400
pubmed: 27428483
Odegard KC, Dinardo JA, Tsai-Goodman B et al (2004) Anaesthesia considerations for cardiac MRI in infants and small children. Paediatr Anaesth 14:471–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9592.2004.01221.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2004.01221.x
pubmed: 15153209
Stockton E, Hughes M, Broadhead M et al (2012) A prospective audit of safety issues associated with general anesthesia for pediatric cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Paediatr Anaesth 22:1087–1093. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9592.2012.03833.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2012.03833.x
pubmed: 22458837
Gottlieb EA, Andropoulos DB (2013) Anesthesia for the patient with congenital heart disease presenting for noncardiac surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 26:318–326. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0b013e328360c50b
doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e328360c50b
pubmed: 23614956
Matisoff AJ, Olivieri L, Schwartz JM, Deutsch N (2015) Risk assessment and anesthetic management of patients with Williams syndrome: a comprehensive review. Paediatr Anaesth 25:1207–1215. https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.12775
doi: 10.1111/pan.12775
pubmed: 26456018
Dillman JR, Ellis JH, Cohan RH et al (2007) Frequency and severity of acute allergic-like reactions to gadolinium-containing IV contrast media in children and adults. Am J Roentgenol 189:1533–1538. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.2554
doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2554
Rozenfeld MN, Podberesky DJ (2018) Gadolinium-based contrast agents in children. Pediatr Radiol 48:1188–1196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-018-4165-1
doi: 10.1007/s00247-018-4165-1
pubmed: 30078039
Chan FP (2008) MR and CT imaging of the pediatric patient with structural heart disease. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 20:393–399. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semtcvs.2008.11.006
doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2008.11.006
pubmed: 19251181
Mangal R, Jain A, Amin P et al (2018) Role of multi-detector computed tomography in congenital heart diseases. Int J Res Med Sci 6:3423. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20184058
doi: 10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20184058
Secinaro A, Curione D, Mortensen KH et al (2019) Dual-source computed tomography coronary artery imaging in children. Pediatr Radiol 49:1823–1839. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-019-04494-2
doi: 10.1007/s00247-019-04494-2
pubmed: 31440884
Jadhav SP, Golriz F, Atweh LA et al (2015) CT angiography of neonates and infants: comparison of radiation dose and image quality of target mode prospectively ECG-gated 320-MDCT and ungated helical 64-MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204:W184–W191. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.14.12846
doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.12846
pubmed: 25615779
Han BK, Overman DM, Grant K et al (2013) Non-sedated, free breathing cardiac CT for evaluation of complex congenital heart disease in neonates. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 7:354–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2013.11.006
doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2013.11.006
pubmed: 24331930
Lell MM, May M, Deak P et al (2011) High-pitch spiral computed tomography: effect on image quality and radiation dose in pediatric chest computed tomography. Invest Radiol 46:116–123. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181f33b1d
doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181f33b1d
pubmed: 20856124
Nordmeyer J, Gaudin R, Tann OR et al (2010) MRI may be sufficient for noninvasive assessment of great vessel stents: an in vitro comparison of MRI, CT, and conventional angiography. Am J Roentgenol 195:865–871. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.4166
doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.4166
Rigolli M, Anandabaskaran S, Christiansen JP, Whalley GA (2016) Bias associated with left ventricular quantification by multimodality imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Open Hear 3:e000388. https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2015-000388
doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2015-000388
Raman SV, Shah M, McCarthy B et al (2006) Multi-detector row cardiac computed tomography accurately quantifies right and left ventricular size and function compared with cardiac magnetic resonance. Am Heart J 151:736–744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2005.04.029
doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.04.029
pubmed: 16504643
Einstein AJ, Henzlova MJ, Rajagopalan S (2007) Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. J Am Med Assoc 298:317–323. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.298.3.317
doi: 10.1001/jama.298.3.317
Dougeni E, Faulkner K, Panayiotakis G (2012) A review of patient dose and optimisation methods in adult and paediatric CT scanning. Eur J Radiol 81:e665–e683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.05.025
doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.05.025
pubmed: 21684099
Gherardi GG, Iball GR, Darby MJ, Thomson JDR (2011) Cardiac computed tomography and conventional angiography in the diagnosis of congenital cardiac disease in children: recent trends and radiation doses. Cardiol Young 21:616–622. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1047951111000485
doi: 10.1017/S1047951111000485
pubmed: 21733206
Han BK, Lindberg J, Grant K et al (2011) Accuracy and safety of high pitch computed tomography imaging in young children with complex congenital heart disease. Am J Cardiol 107:1541–1546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.01.065
doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.01.065
pubmed: 21539949
Beckett KR, Moriarity AK, Langer JM (2015) Safe use of contrast media: what the radiologist needs to know. Radiographics 35:1738–1750. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2015150033
doi: 10.1148/rg.2015150033
pubmed: 26466182
van der Molen AJ, Reimer P, Dekkers IA et al (2018) Post-contrast acute kidney injury—Part 1: definition, clinical features, incidence, role of contrast medium and risk factors: recommendations for updated ESUR Contrast Medium Safety Committee guidelines. Eur Radiol 28:2845–2855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5246-5
doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5246-5
pubmed: 29426991
pmcid: 5986826
Prakash A, Powell AJ, Geva T (2010) Multimodality Noninvasive Imaging for Assessment of Congenital Heart Disease. Adv Cardiovasc Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.109.875021
doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.109.875021
Tomà P, Magistrelli A, Secinaro A et al (2020) Sustainability of paediatric radiology in Italy. Pediatr Radiol 6:66
Francis SA, Daly C, Heydari B et al (2013) Cost-effectiveness analysis for imaging techniques with a focus on cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 15:52
doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-15-52
Petersen SE, Abdulkareem M, Leiner T (2019) Artificial intelligence will transform cardiac imaging—opportunities and challenges. Front Cardiovasc Med 6:133. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2019.00133
doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2019.00133
pubmed: 31552275
pmcid: 6746883
Kilner PJ (2011) The role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in adults with congenital heart disease. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 54:295–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2011.07.006
doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2011.07.006
pubmed: 22014496
pmcid: 3245850
Friedrich MG (2017) The future of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Heart J 38:1698–1701. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx243
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx243
pubmed: 30052883
Zhong L, Schrauben EM, Garcia J et al (2019) Intracardiac 4D flow MRI in congenital heart disease: recommendations on behalf of the ISMRM Flow & Motion Study Group. J Magn Reson Imaging 50:677–681. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26858
doi: 10.1002/jmri.26858
pubmed: 31317587
Azarine A, Garçon P, Stansal A et al (2019) Four-dimensional flow MRI: principles and cardiovascular applications. Radiographics 39:632–648. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2019180091
doi: 10.1148/rg.2019180091
pubmed: 30901284
Vasanawala SS, Hanneman K, Alley MT, Hsiao A (2015) Congenital heart disease assessment with 4D flow MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 42:870–886. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.24856
doi: 10.1002/jmri.24856
pubmed: 25708923
Ferreira VM, Piechnik SK, Robson MD et al (2014) Myocardial tissue characterization by magnetic resonance imaging: novel applications of T1 and T2 mapping. J Thorac Imaging 29:147–154. https://doi.org/10.1097/RTI.0000000000000077
doi: 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000077
pubmed: 24576837
pmcid: 4252135
Salerno M, Kramer CM (2013) Advances in parametric mapping with CMR imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 6:806–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.05.005
doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.05.005
pubmed: 23845576
pmcid: 4073213
Messroghli DR, Moon JC, Ferreira VM et al (2017) Clinical recommendations for cardiovascular magnetic resonance mapping of T1, T2, T2 and extracellular volume: a consensus statement by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) endorsed by the European Association for Cardiovascular Imagin. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 19:75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-017-0389-8
doi: 10.1186/s12968-017-0389-8
pubmed: 28992817
pmcid: 5633041
Riesenkampff E, Messroghli DR, Redington AN, Grosse-Wortmann L (2015) Myocardial T1 mapping in pediatric and congenital heart disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 8:e002504. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.002504
doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.002504
pubmed: 25657297
Broberg CS, Burchill LJ (2015) Myocardial factor revisited: the importance of myocardial fibrosis in adults with congenital heart disease. Int J Cardiol 189:204–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.04.064
doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.04.064
pubmed: 25897907
pmcid: 4446173
Dardeer AM, Hudsmith L, Wesolowski R et al (2018) The potential role of feature tracking in adult congenital heart disease: advantages and disadvantages in measuring myocardial deformation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Congenit Cardiol 2:3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40949-018-0015-0
doi: 10.1186/s40949-018-0015-0
Muthurangu V, Taylor A, Andriantsimiavona R, Hegde S, Miquel ME, Tulloh R, Baker E, Hill DL, Razavi RS (2004) Novel method of quantifying pulmonary vascular resistance by use of simultaneous invasive pressure monitoring and phase-contrast magnetic resonance flow. Circulation 110:826–834. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000138741.72946.84
doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000138741.72946.84
pubmed: 15302793
Rhode KS, Sermesant M, Brogan D et al (2005) A system for real-time XMR guided cardiovascular intervention. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 24:1428–1440. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2005.856731
doi: 10.1109/TMI.2005.856731
pubmed: 16279080
Roy CW, Van Amerom JFP, Marini D et al (2019) Fetal cardiac MRI: a review of technical advancements. Top Magn Reson Imaging 28:235–244. https://doi.org/10.1097/RMR.0000000000000218
doi: 10.1097/RMR.0000000000000218
pubmed: 31592990
pmcid: 6791520
Portnoy S, Seed M, Sled JG, Macgowan CK (2017) Non-invasive evaluation of blood oxygen saturation and hematocrit from T1 and T2 relaxation times: In-vitro validation in fetal blood. Magn Reson Med 78:2352–2359. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.26599
doi: 10.1002/mrm.26599
pubmed: 28191646
Rodríguez-Soto AE, Langham MC, Abdulmalik O et al (2018) MRI quantification of human fetal O
doi: 10.1002/mrm.27094
pubmed: 29359353
pmcid: 5980668
Valverde I, Gomez-Ciriza G, Hussain T et al (2017) Three-dimensional printed models for surgical planning of complex congenital heart defects: an international multicentre study. Eur J Cardio-thoracic Surg 52:1139–1148. https://doi.org/10.1093/EJCTS/EZX208
doi: 10.1093/EJCTS/EZX208
Nicol ED, Norgaard BL, Blanke P et al (2019) The future of cardiovascular computed tomography: advanced analytics and clinical insights. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 12:1058–1072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.11.037
doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.11.037
pubmed: 31171259