No pain management for labour: individual and organisational determinants: A secondary analysis of the 2016 French National Perinatal Survey.


Journal

European journal of anaesthesiology
ISSN: 1365-2346
Titre abrégé: Eur J Anaesthesiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8411711

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 06 2022
Historique:
entrez: 24 5 2022
pubmed: 25 5 2022
medline: 27 5 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Disparities in access to pain management have been identified in several care settings, such as emergency departments and intensive care units, but with regard to labour analgesia, it remains poorly explored. To determine the proportion of women without pain management during labour and its individual and organisational determinants. Secondary analysis of a nationwide cross-sectional population-based study, the 2016 French National Perinatal Survey. All maternity units in France. Ten thousand and eleven women who attempted vaginal delivery with a labour duration at least 15 min. Absence of pain management, defined as absence of any pharmacological or nonpharmacological analgesic method during labour. Among the 10 011 women included, 542 (5.4%) had no labour pain management: 318 (3.7%) of the 8526 women who initially preferred to use neuraxial analgesia and 222 (15.8%) of the 1402 who did not. Using generalised estimating equations stratified according to the maternal antenatal preference for neuraxial analgesia, the common determinants of no labour pain management in both groups were no attendance at childbirth education classes and admission to a delivery unit during the night. Among women who initially preferred to use neuraxial analgesia, those who delivered in units with <1500 annual deliveries compared with units with 2000 to 3499 annual deliveries, were more likely to do without pain management [adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 1.96; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.39 to 2.78]; among those who did not prefer to use it, women born abroad were more likely to do without labour pain management (adjusted OR = 1.64; 95% CI, 1.12 to 2.40). In France, 1 : 20 women had no labour pain management, and this proportion was three times higher among women who preferred not to use neuraxial analgesia. Enhancing maternal information on labour pain and its management, especially nonpharmacological methods, and rethinking care organisation, could improve access to analgesia of any kind.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Disparities in access to pain management have been identified in several care settings, such as emergency departments and intensive care units, but with regard to labour analgesia, it remains poorly explored.
OBJECTIVES
To determine the proportion of women without pain management during labour and its individual and organisational determinants.
DESIGN
Secondary analysis of a nationwide cross-sectional population-based study, the 2016 French National Perinatal Survey.
SETTINGS
All maternity units in France.
PARTICIPANTS
Ten thousand and eleven women who attempted vaginal delivery with a labour duration at least 15 min.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE
Absence of pain management, defined as absence of any pharmacological or nonpharmacological analgesic method during labour.
RESULTS
Among the 10 011 women included, 542 (5.4%) had no labour pain management: 318 (3.7%) of the 8526 women who initially preferred to use neuraxial analgesia and 222 (15.8%) of the 1402 who did not. Using generalised estimating equations stratified according to the maternal antenatal preference for neuraxial analgesia, the common determinants of no labour pain management in both groups were no attendance at childbirth education classes and admission to a delivery unit during the night. Among women who initially preferred to use neuraxial analgesia, those who delivered in units with <1500 annual deliveries compared with units with 2000 to 3499 annual deliveries, were more likely to do without pain management [adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 1.96; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.39 to 2.78]; among those who did not prefer to use it, women born abroad were more likely to do without labour pain management (adjusted OR = 1.64; 95% CI, 1.12 to 2.40).
CONCLUSION
In France, 1 : 20 women had no labour pain management, and this proportion was three times higher among women who preferred not to use neuraxial analgesia. Enhancing maternal information on labour pain and its management, especially nonpharmacological methods, and rethinking care organisation, could improve access to analgesia of any kind.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35608876
doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001682
pii: 00003643-202206000-00002
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

489-497

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.

Références

Raja SN, Carr DB, Cohen M, et al. The revised International Association for the Study of Pain definition of pain: concepts, challenges, and compromises. Pain 2020; 161:1976–1982.
Brennan F, Lohman D, Gwyther L. Access to pain management as a human right. Am J Public Health 2019; 109:61–65.
Cousins MJ, Lynch ME. The Declaration Montreal: access to pain management is a fundamental human right. Pain 2011; 152:2673–2674.
Guéant S, Taleb A, Borel-Kühner J, et al. Quality of pain management in the emergency department: results of a multicentre prospective study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2011; 28:97–105.
Poonai N, Cowie A, Davidson C, et al. Reported provision of analgesia to patients with acute abdominal pain in Canadian paediatric emergency departments. CJEM 2016; 18:323–330.
Rupp T, Delaney KA. Inadequate analgesia in emergency medicine. Ann Emerg Med 2004; 43:494–503.
Guedj R, Danan C, Daoud P, et al. Does neonatal pain management in intensive care units differ between night and day? An observational study. BMJ Open 2014; 4:e004086.
Roos-Blom M-J, Dongelmans D, Stilma W, et al. Association between organizational characteristics and adequate pain management at the intensive care unit. J Crit Care 2020; 56:1–5.
Melzack R. The myth of painless childbirth (The John J Bonica Lecture). Pain 1984; 19:321–337.
Merrer J, Chantry AA, Khoshnood B, et al. Determinants of the use of nonpharmacological analgesia for labor pain management: a national population-based study. Pain 2020; 161:2571–2580.
Toledo P, Sun J, Grobman WA, et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in neuraxial labor analgesia. Anesth Analg 2012; 114:172–178.
Schytt E, Waldenström U. Epidural analgesia for labor pain: whose choice? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2010; 89:238–242.
Glance LG, Wissler R, Glantz C, et al. Racial differences in the use of epidural analgesia for labor. Anesthesiology 2007; 106:19–25.
Kpéa L, Bonnet M-P, Le Ray C, et al. Initial preference for labor without neuraxial analgesia and actual use: results from a national survey in France. Anesth Analg 2015; 121:759–766.
Anim-Somuah M, Smyth RM, Cyna AM, et al. Epidural versus nonepidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 5:CD000331.
Jones L, Othman M, Dowswell T, et al. Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 3:CD009234.
Simkin P. Nonpharmacologic relief of pain during labor: Systematic reviews of five methods. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: (5 Suppl nature): S131–S159.
Blondel B, Coulm B, Bonnet C, et al. National Coordination Group of the National Perinatal Surveys. Trends in perinatal health in metropolitan France from 1995 to 2016: results from the French National Perinatal Surveys. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2017; 46:701–713.
Opatowski M, Blondel B, Khoshnood B, et al. New index of social deprivation during pregnancy: results from a national study in France. BMJ Open 2016; 6:e009511.
Zhang J, Landy HJ, Ware Branch D, et al. Consortium on Safe Labor. Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116:1281–1287.
Simmons SW, Taghizadeh N, Dennis AT, et al. Combined spinal-epidural versus epidural analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 10:CD003401.
Wilson SH, Elliott MP, Wolf BJ, et al. A prospective observational study of ethnic and racial differences in neuraxial labor analgesia request and pain relief. Anesth Analg 2014; 119:105–109.
Robertson E, Johansson S-E. Use of complementary, nonpharmacological pain reduction methods during childbirth among foreign-born and Swedish-born women. Midwifery 2010; 26:442–449.
Kantor E, Guglielminotti J, Azria E, et al. Socioeconomic deprivation and utilization of anesthetic care during pregnancy and delivery: a French retrospective, multicenter, cohort study. Anesth Analg 2017; 125:925–933.
Jiménez-Puente A, Benítez-Parejo N, Del Diego-Salas J, et al. Ethnic differences in the use of intrapartum epidural analgesia. BMC Health Serv Res 2012; 12:207.
Senden IP, van du Wetering MD, Eskes TK, et al. Labor pain: a comparison of parturients in a Dutch and an American teaching hospital. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 71:541–544.
Christiaens W, Verhaeghe M, Bracke P. Pain acceptance and personal control in pain relief in two maternity care models: a cross-national comparison of Belgium and the Netherlands. BMC Health Serv Res 2010; 10:268.
Bryant AS, Worjoloh A, Caughey AB, et al. Racial/ethnic disparities in obstetric outcomes and care: prevalence and determinants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 202:335–343.
Silva Borges FN da, Fischer FM. Twelve-hour night shifts of healthcare workers: a risk to the patients? Chronobiol Int 2003; 20:351–360.
James L, James SM, Wilson M, et al. Sleep health and predicted cognitive effectiveness of nurses working 12-h shifts: an observational study. Int J Nurs Stud 2020; 112:103667.
République française. Décret no 98–900 du 9 octobre 1998 relatif aux conditions techniques de fonctionnement auxquelles doivent satisfaire les établissements de santé pour être autorisés à pratiquer les activités d’obstétrique, de néonatologie ou de réanimation néonatale et modifiant le code de la santé publique (troisième partie: Décrets). 1998. Avialable at: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/jorf/id/JORFTEXT000000756322/ . [accessed 15 March 2021]

Auteurs

Jade Merrer (J)

From the Université de Paris, Centre of Research in Epidemiology and StatisticS/CRESS/Obstetrical Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé), INSERM, INRA (JM, AAC, BB, ClR, M-PB), Midwifery school of Baudelocque, AP-HP, Université de Paris (AAC), Port-Royal Maternity Unit, Department of Obstetrics, Cochin Broca Hôtel-Dieu hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (ClR) and Sorbonne University, GRC 29, DMU DREAM, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Armand Trousseau Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France (M-PB).

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH