Assessment of composition and spatial dynamics of weed communities in agroecosystem under varying edaphic factors.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
08
01
2022
accepted:
26
03
2022
entrez:
27
5
2022
pubmed:
28
5
2022
medline:
1
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Weeds are important components of the agroecosystems due to their role as primary producers within the farming systems, yet they are considered as major constraints to crop production. A phytosociological study was conducted to assess the composition and spatial distribution of existing weed species under the influence of various edaphic factors in the 15 wheat fields. Quadrat method was applied and different phytosociological attributes including abundance, density, and frequency were estimated by randomly laying down 10 square-shaped quadrats of size 1m2 in each wheat field. A total of 34 weed species belonging to 17 families and 30 genera were explored from 150 quadrats. Fabaceae and Asteraceae were ubiquitous plant families. Various edaphic factors such as; soil texture, electrical conductivity, soil pH, total dissolved solids, nitrogen, calcium carbonate, organic matter, NaCl, calcium, phosphorous, potassium, sodium, and zinc were determined. Pearson's correlation was employed to correlate weeds and the potential edaphic variables. The results depicted that most of these weed pairs' associations correlated positively. Simultaneously, the abundant weed species including Trifolium repens, Coronopus didymus, and Urtica dioica showed a positive correlation with most of the investigated ecological variables.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35622843
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266778
pii: PONE-D-22-00689
pmc: PMC9140292
doi:
Substances chimiques
Soil
0
Phosphorus
27YLU75U4W
Potassium
RWP5GA015D
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Retracted Publication
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0266778Commentaires et corrections
Type : RetractionIn
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Ecology. 2007 May;88(5):1322-7
pubmed: 17536417
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2014 Oct 15;10:72
pubmed: 25318542
Nat Commun. 2021 Sep 9;12(1):5350
pubmed: 34504089
Natl Sci Rev. 2021 Apr 02;8(10):nwab025
pubmed: 34858605