Systemic hormonal contraception and risk of venous thromboembolism.
Acetates
Aged
Contraception
Contraceptives, Oral, Combined
/ adverse effects
Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal
/ adverse effects
Cyproterone
Estradiol
Estrogens
/ adverse effects
Female
Humans
Progesterone Congeners
Progestins
/ adverse effects
Prospective Studies
Venous Thromboembolism
/ chemically induced
estradiol
ethinylestradiol
hormonal contraception
nested case-control
progestin-only contraception
venous thromboembolism
Journal
Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica
ISSN: 1600-0412
Titre abrégé: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370343
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2022
08 2022
Historique:
revised:
04
04
2022
received:
18
11
2021
accepted:
09
05
2022
pubmed:
29
5
2022
medline:
12
7
2022
entrez:
28
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The increased risk of venous thromboembolism associated with the use of hormonal contraception is well recognized, but evidence regarding hormonal contraception containing natural estradiol is limited. This study aimed to assess the associations between the patterns of use of different systemic hormonal contraceptives and the risk of venous thromboembolism during 2017-2019. All fertile-aged women (15-49 years) living in Finland in 2017 and using hormonal contraception in 2017 and their 1:1 age- and residence-matched controls not using hormonal contraception in 2017 (altogether 587 559 women) were selected from the Prescription Centre. All incident venous thromboembolism cases during 2018-2019 and their 4:1 age-matched controls were further analyzed in a prospective nested case-control design to assess the associations between the use (starting, stopping, continuous vs no use) of different hormonal contraception types and venous thromboembolism. Altogether, 1334 venous thromboembolism cases occurred during the follow-up period (incidence rate 1.14 per 1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-1.20), with an incidence rate ratio of hormonal contraception vs no hormonal contraception use of 1.42 (95% CI 1.27-1.58). Compared with non-use, starting the use of gestodene and ethinylestradiol (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.85; 95% CI 1.62-5.03), drospirenone and ethinylestradiol (aOR 1.55; 95% CI 0.98-2.44), desogestrel and ethinylestradiol (aOR 1.97; 95% CI 0.99-3.92), and transdermal patch releasing norelgestromin and ethinylestradiol (aOR 5.10; 95% CI 1.12-23.16), as well as continuing the use of gestodene and ethinylestradiol (aOR 2.60; 95% CI 1.61-4.21), drospirenone and ethinylestradiol (aOR 1.55; 95% CI 1.02-2.37), cyproterone-acetate and estrogen/ethinylestradiol (aOR 1.66; 95% CI 1.06-2.61), and vaginal ring releasing etonogestrel and ethinylestradiol (aOR 3.27; 95% CI 1.95-5.48) were associated with venous thromboembolism risk. Regarding the type of estrogen, the highest risk was associated with current use (vs non use in the previous 180 days) of ethinylestradiol-containing preparations (aOR 2.20; 95% CI 1.82-2.65), followed by estradiol-containing preparations (aOR 1.39; 95% CI 1.04-1.87) with no risk for progestin-only hormonal contraception. Current use of estradiol-containing preparations was not associated with venous thromboembolism risk after exclusion of cyproterone-acetate and estrogen/ethinylestradiol (aOR 1.05; 95% CI 0.66-1.66). An increased risk of venous thromboembolism is associated with ethinylestradiol-containing combined preparations. The use of estradiol-containing combined preparations confers only a slightly increased risk, possibly driven by cyproterone-containing combined oral contraceptives, whereas the use of progestin-only contraception is not associated with venous thromboembolism.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35633036
doi: 10.1111/aogs.14384
pmc: PMC9564731
doi:
Substances chimiques
Acetates
0
Contraceptives, Oral, Combined
0
Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal
0
Estrogens
0
Progesterone Congeners
0
Progestins
0
Estradiol
4TI98Z838E
Cyproterone
E61Q31EK2F
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
846-855Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG).
Références
Contraception. 2016 Dec;94(6):678-700
pubmed: 27153743
Open Access J Contracept. 2018 Nov 08;9:75-79
pubmed: 30519125
Int J Epidemiol. 2016 Dec 1;45(6):1866-1886
pubmed: 28108528
Eur J Endocrinol. 2014 Dec;171(6):R221-30
pubmed: 25012200
Epidemiology. 2009 May;20(3):321-9
pubmed: 19289963
Am J Public Health. 1996 Nov;86(11):1582-9
pubmed: 8916524
BMJ. 2013 Sep 12;347:f5298
pubmed: 24030561
BMJ. 2009 Aug 13;339:b2921
pubmed: 19679614
Thromb Res. 2011 Feb;127 Suppl 3:S30-4
pubmed: 21262435
BMJ. 2012 May 10;344:e2990
pubmed: 22577198
BMJ. 2016 May 10;353:i2002
pubmed: 27164970
Drugs R D. 2011;11(2):159-70
pubmed: 21679006
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2011 Dec;16(6):444-57
pubmed: 22066891
Transl Res. 2020 Nov;225:9-19
pubmed: 32599096
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 Aug;101(8):846-855
pubmed: 35633036
N Engl J Med. 2012 Jun 14;366(24):2257-66
pubmed: 22693997
Int J Obes (Lond). 2015 Jun;39(6):1019-26
pubmed: 25771928
BMJ. 2014 Jan 3;348:f7707
pubmed: 31419845
BMJ. 2009 Aug 13;339:b2890
pubmed: 19679613
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2015 Aug;12(8):464-74
pubmed: 26076949
Contraception. 2016 Oct;94(4):328-39
pubmed: 27343748
Thromb Haemost. 2017 Jan 26;117(2):390-400
pubmed: 27975103
Epidemiology. 2010 May;21(3):383-8
pubmed: 20335814
Thromb Haemost. 2011 Mar;105(3):560-7
pubmed: 21225090
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 03;(3):CD010813
pubmed: 24590565
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 15;10(10):e040072
pubmed: 33060091
Inform Health Soc Care. 2018 Sep;43(3):310-319
pubmed: 28388252
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017 Jan;96(1):19-28
pubmed: 27861709
Scand J Public Health. 2012 Aug;40(6):505-15
pubmed: 22899561