Comparison of low power and high power holmium YAG laser settings in flexible ureteroscopy.
Dusting
Ho:YAG laser
Lithotripsy
Renal stones
Journal
World journal of urology
ISSN: 1433-8726
Titre abrégé: World J Urol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8307716
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2022
Jul 2022
Historique:
received:
02
11
2021
accepted:
02
05
2022
pubmed:
29
5
2022
medline:
30
6
2022
entrez:
28
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To compare the efficacy of conventional low power and high power holmium: yttrium aluminum-garnet (Ho: YAG) laser lithotripsy settings during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). METHODS: The prospective study was conducted in patients undergoing RIRS for renal stones less than 2 cm diameter. Pulsed Ho:YAG laser (Lumenis A total of 120 underwent RIRS with 63 and 57 patients in LP and HP group, respectively. Median stone volume and stone density were comparable between the groups. The total energy used and laser energy used to ablate 1mm The total energy used and J/mm
Identifiants
pubmed: 35633401
doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04040-0
pii: 10.1007/s00345-022-04040-0
doi:
Substances chimiques
Holmium
W1XX32SQN1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1839-1844Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Erhard MJ, Bagley DH (1995) Urologic applications of the holmium laser: preliminary experience. J Endourol 9(5):383–386
doi: 10.1089/end.1995.9.383
Coptcoat MJ, Ison KT, Watson G, Wickham JE (1988) Lasertripsy for ureteric stones in 120 cases: lessons learned. Br J Urol 61(6):487–489
doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.1988.tb05085.x
Knudsen BE (2019) Laser fibers for holmium: Yag lithotripsy: what is important and what is new. Urol Clin N Am 46(2):185–191
doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2018.12.004
Traxer O, Keller EX (2020) Thulium fiber laser: the new player for kidney stone treatment? A comparison with holmium: Yag laser. World J Urol 38(8):1883–1894
doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02654-5
Kronenberg P, Traxer O (2015) Update on lasers in urology 2014: current assessment on holmium:Yttrium-aluminum-garnet (ho:Yag) laser lithotripter settings and laser fibers. World J Urol 33(4):463–469
doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1395-1
Emiliani E, Angerri O (2021) High-power, high-frequency ho: Yag lasers are essential for retrograde intrarenal surgery. Eur Urol Focus 7(1):3–4
doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.08.008
Aldoukhi AH, Black KM, Hall TL, Roberts WW, Ghani KR (2020) Frequency threshold for ablation during holmium laser lithotripsy: how high can you go? J Endourol 34(10):1075–1081
doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0149
Finch W, Johnston R, Shaida N, Winterbottom A, Wiseman O (2014) Measuring stone volume—three-dimensional software reconstruction or an ellipsoid algebra formula? BJU Int 113(4):610–614
doi: 10.1111/bju.12456
Doizi S, Traxer O (2018) Flexible ureteroscopy: Technique, tips and tricks. Urolithiasis 46(1):47–58
doi: 10.1007/s00240-017-1030-x
Chen S, Fu N, Cui W, Zhao Z, Luo X (2019) Comparison of stone dusting efficiency when using different energy settings of holmium: Yag laser for flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper urinary tract calculi. Urol J 17(3):224–227
pubmed: 31087322
Aldoukhi AH, Roberts WW, Hall TL, Ghani KR (2017) Holmium laser lithotripsy in the new stone age: Dust or bust? Front Surg 4:57
doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2017.00057
Ventimiglia E, Pauchard F, Gorgen ARH, Panthier F, Doizi S, Traxer O (2021) How do we assess the efficacy of ho: Yag low-power laser lithotripsy for the treatment of upper tract urinary stones? Introducing the joules/mm(3) and laser activity concepts. World J Urol 39(3):891–896
doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03241-9
Geraghty RM, Jones P, Somani BK (2017) Worldwide trends of urinary stone disease treatment over the last two decades: a systematic review. J Endourol 31(6):547–556
doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0895
Peretti D, Dalmasso E, Biancolini R, Pecoraro A, Ambruosi C, Venzano F, Fiori C, Porpiglia F, Maugeri O (2021) Flexible ureteroscopy using a 120-w holmium laser: the low-energy/high-frequency approach. Arch Esp Urol 74(3):343–349
pubmed: 33818431
Ventimiglia E, Pauchard F, Quadrini F, Sindhubodee S, Kamkoum H, Jiménez Godínez A, Doizi S, Traxer O (2021) High- and low-power laser lithotripsy achieves similar results: a systematic review and meta-analysis of available clinical series. J Endourol 35(8):1146–1152
doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0090
Mekayten M, Lorber A, Katafigiotis I, Sfoungaristos S, Leotsakos I, Heifetz EM, Yutkin V, Gofrit ON, Duvdevani M (2019) Will stone density stop being a key factor in endourology? The impact of stone density on laser time using lumenis laser p120w and standard 20 w laser: a comparative study. J Endourol 33(7):585–589
doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0181
Bell JR, Penniston KL, Nakada SY (2017) In vitro comparison of stone fragmentation when using various settings with modern variable pulse holmium lasers. J Endourol 31(10):1067–1072
doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0351
De Coninck V, Keller EX, Chiron P, Dragos L, Emiliani E, Doizi S, Berthe L, Traxer O (2019) Ho: Yag laser lithotripsy in non-contact mode: Optimization of fiber to stone working distance to improve ablation efficiency. World J Urol 37(9):1933–1939
doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2589-8
Ofude M, Shima T, Yotsuyanagi S, Ikeda D (2017) Stone attenuation values measured by average hounsfield units and stone volume as predictors of total laser energy required during ureteroscopic lithotripsy using holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet lasers. Urology 102:48–53
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.10.029
Panthier F, Ventimiglia E, Berthe L, Chaussain C, Daudon M, Doizi S, Traxer O (2020) How much energy do we need to ablate 1 mm(3) of stone during ho: Yag laser lithotripsy? An in vitro study. World J Urol 38(11):2945–2953
doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03091-5
Chawla SN, Chang MF, Chang A, Lenoir J, Bagley DH (2008) Effectiveness of high-frequency holmium: Yag laser stone fragmentation: the “popcorn effect.” J Endourol 22(4):645–650
doi: 10.1089/end.2007.9843
Peretti D, Dalmasso E, Pecoraro A, Ambruosi C, Venzano F, Fiori C, Porpiglia F, Maugeri O (2022) Low-energy highfrequency Ho-YAG lithotripsy: is RIRS going forward? A case-control study. Urolithiasis 50(1):79–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-021-01282-2 . Accessed 23 Aug 2021
doi: 10.1007/s00240-021-01282-2
pubmed: 34424352
Grasso M, Chalik Y (1998) Principles and applications of laser lithotripsy: Experience with the holmium laser lithotrite. J Clin Laser Med Surg 16(1):3–7
doi: 10.1089/clm.1998.16.3
Klaver P, de Boorder T, Rem AI, Lock T, Noordmans HJ (2017) In vitro comparison of renal stone laser treatment using fragmentation and popcorn technique. Lasers Surg Med 49(7):698–704
doi: 10.1002/lsm.22671
Emiliani E, Talso M, Cho SY, Baghdadi M, Mahmoud S, Pinheiro H, Traxer O (2017) Optimal settings for the noncontact holmium: Yag stone fragmentation popcorn technique. J Urol 198(3):702–706
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.02.3371
Wollin DA, Tom WR, Jiang R, Simmons WN, Preminger GM, Lipkin ME (2019) An in vitro evaluation of laser settings and location in the efficiency of the popcorn effect. Urolithiasis 47(4):377–382
doi: 10.1007/s00240-018-1066-6
Kronenberg P, Traxer O (2014) In vitro fragmentation efficiency of holmium: Yttrium-aluminum-garnet (yag) laser lithotripsy–a comprehensive study encompassing different frequencies, pulse energies, total power levels and laser fibre diameters. BJU Int 114(2):261–267
doi: 10.1111/bju.12567
Aldoukhi AH, Hall TL, Ghani KR, Maxwell AD, MacConaghy B, Roberts WW (2018) Caliceal fluid temperature during high-power holmium laser lithotripsy in an in vivo porcine model. J Endourol 32(8):724–729
doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0395
Bhat A, Katz JE, Banerjee I, Blachman-Braun R, Alter K, Shah RH, Smith NA, Shah HN (2021) A prospective evaluation of high- and low-power holmium laser settings for transurethral lithotripsy in the management of adults with large bladder calculi. World J Urol 39:3481–3488
doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03617-5
Chen S, Zhu L, Yang S, Wu W, Liao L, Tan J (2012) High- vs low-power holmium laser lithotripsy: a prospective, randomized study in patients undergoing multitract minipercutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology 79(2):293–297
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.08.036