Systematic Comparison of Nanopore and Illumina Sequencing for the Detection of Plant Viruses and Viroids Using Total RNA Sequencing Approach.
Illumina MiSeq sequencing
comparison
high-throughput sequencing
nanopore MinION sequencing
plant virus/viroid detection
Journal
Frontiers in microbiology
ISSN: 1664-302X
Titre abrégé: Front Microbiol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101548977
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
25
02
2022
accepted:
31
03
2022
entrez:
31
5
2022
pubmed:
1
6
2022
medline:
1
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
High-throughput sequencing (HTS) has become an important tool for plant virus detection and discovery. Nanopore sequencing has been rapidly developing in the recent years and offers new possibilities for fast diagnostic applications of HTS. With this in mind, a study was completed, comparing the most established HTS platform (MiSeq benchtop sequencer-Illumina), with the MinION sequencer (Oxford Nanopore Technologies) for the detection of plant viruses and viroids. Method comparisons were performed on five selected samples, containing two viroids, which were sequenced using nanopore technology for the first time and 11 plant viruses with different genome organizations. For all samples, sequencing libraries for the MiSeq were prepared from ribosomal RNA-depleted total RNA (rRNA-depleted totRNA) and for MinION sequencing, direct RNA sequencing of totRNA was used. Moreover, for one of the samples, which contained five different plant viruses and a viroid, three additional variations of sample preparation for MinION sequencing were also used: direct RNA sequencing of rRNA-depleted totRNA, cDNA-PCR sequencing of totRNA, and cDNA-PCR sequencing of rRNA-depleted totRNA. Whilst direct RNA sequencing of total RNA was the quickest of the tested approaches, it was also the least sensitive: using this approach, we failed to detect only one virus that was present in a sample at an extremely low titer. All other MinION sequencing approaches showed improved performance with outcomes similar to Illumina sequencing, with cDNA-PCR sequencing of rRNA-depleted totRNA showing the best performance amongst tested nanopore MinION sequencing approaches. Moreover, when enough sequencing data were generated, high-quality consensus viral genome sequences could be reconstructed from MinION sequencing data, with high identity to the ones generated from Illumina data. The results of this study implicate that, when an appropriate sample and library preparation are selected, nanopore MinION sequencing could be used for the detection of plant viruses and viroids with similar performance as Illumina sequencing. Taken as a balance of practicality and performance, this suggests that MinION sequencing may be an ideal tool for fast and affordable virus diagnostics.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35633678
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.883921
pmc: PMC9131090
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
883921Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Pecman, Adams, Gutiérrez-Aguirre, Fox, Boonham, Ravnikar and Kutnjak.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
IA and AF are employed by Fera Science Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Nat Methods. 2018 Mar;15(3):201-206
pubmed: 29334379
Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 14;7(1):3510
pubmed: 28615658
Virology. 2009 Sep 30;392(2):203-14
pubmed: 19665162
Genome Res. 2017 May;27(5):737-746
pubmed: 28100585
Nat Protoc. 2017 Jun;12(6):1261-1276
pubmed: 28538739
Arch Virol. 2020 Dec;165(12):2967-2971
pubmed: 32886214
Genome Med. 2015 Sep 29;7:99
pubmed: 26416663
Virology. 2009 May 10;387(2):395-401
pubmed: 19304303
Bioinformatics. 2018 Aug 1;34(15):2666-2669
pubmed: 29547981
Nature. 2016 Feb 11;530(7589):228-232
pubmed: 26840485
Nat Methods. 2015 Jan;12(1):59-60
pubmed: 25402007
Genome Res. 2007 Mar;17(3):377-86
pubmed: 17255551
F1000Res. 2015 Oct 15;4:1075
pubmed: 26834992
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Nov;20(11):1263-1272
pubmed: 32679081
Trends Genet. 2018 Sep;34(9):666-681
pubmed: 29941292
Phytopathology. 2019 May;109(5):716-725
pubmed: 30801236
Plant Dis. 2018 Aug;102(8):1648-1652
pubmed: 30673417
J Virol Methods. 2016 Oct;236:35-40
pubmed: 27387642
Sci Rep. 2018 Dec 14;8(1):17879
pubmed: 30552347
J Virol Methods. 2022 Feb;300:114417
pubmed: 34902457
Plant Dis. 2019 Sep;103(9):2199-2203
pubmed: 31322493
Annu Rev Virol. 2019 Sep 29;6(1):387-409
pubmed: 31283443
Virology. 2009 May 25;388(1):1-7
pubmed: 19394993
Mol Plant Pathol. 2009 Jul;10(4):537-45
pubmed: 19523106
Front Microbiol. 2017 Oct 13;8:1998
pubmed: 29081770
Genes (Basel). 2019 Aug 21;10(9):
pubmed: 31438604
Viruses. 2019 Dec 07;11(12):
pubmed: 31817886
Bioinformatics. 2016 Jul 15;32(14):2103-10
pubmed: 27153593
Front Microbiol. 2019 Feb 25;10:260
pubmed: 30858830
Virol J. 2016 Jun 02;13:85
pubmed: 27250973
Annu Rev Microbiol. 2014;68:395-414
pubmed: 25002087
Bioinformatics. 2018 Sep 15;34(18):3094-3100
pubmed: 29750242