Prevalence and correlates of driving under the influence of stimulants: Evidence from a national sample.


Journal

Addictive behaviors
ISSN: 1873-6327
Titre abrégé: Addict Behav
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7603486

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 2022
Historique:
received: 19 11 2021
revised: 12 04 2022
accepted: 09 05 2022
pubmed: 3 6 2022
medline: 10 6 2022
entrez: 2 6 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Several million Americans use illicit stimulants every month and national data suggest stimulant use is increasing. However, little evidence exists that examines the prevalence and correlates of driving under the influence of stimulants (DUIS). The present study aimed to provide new evidence on the prevalence of DUIS in the U.S. adult population. This study examined data from 170,944 adults 18 and older in the 2016-2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Using Stata and R, we estimated the prevalence and key correlates of DUIS among adults in the United States. The overall prevalence of DUIS was 0.7% among adults in general and 28.3% among past-year stimulant users. Among the full adult sample, the prevalence of DUI cocaine was 0.5% and the prevalence of DUI methamphetamine was 0.3%. More than one in five (21.6%) adults with past year cocaine use reported DUI of cocaine, while nearly one half (47.2%) of adults with past year methamphetamine use reported DUI of methamphetamine. There is also a substantially higher likelihood of driving under the influence of stimulants among individuals reporting early onset of use and among those meeting criteria for cocaine/methamphetamine use disorders. Among adults who used cocaine/methamphetamine, those who reported driving under the influence of stimulants were more than 2 times more likely to experience a depressive episode or psychological distress. Findings suggest that prevention/treatment approaches focused on multiple substances as well as mental health needs may be most appropriate for addressing the challenge of DUIS.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Several million Americans use illicit stimulants every month and national data suggest stimulant use is increasing. However, little evidence exists that examines the prevalence and correlates of driving under the influence of stimulants (DUIS). The present study aimed to provide new evidence on the prevalence of DUIS in the U.S. adult population.
METHODS
This study examined data from 170,944 adults 18 and older in the 2016-2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Using Stata and R, we estimated the prevalence and key correlates of DUIS among adults in the United States.
RESULTS
The overall prevalence of DUIS was 0.7% among adults in general and 28.3% among past-year stimulant users. Among the full adult sample, the prevalence of DUI cocaine was 0.5% and the prevalence of DUI methamphetamine was 0.3%. More than one in five (21.6%) adults with past year cocaine use reported DUI of cocaine, while nearly one half (47.2%) of adults with past year methamphetamine use reported DUI of methamphetamine. There is also a substantially higher likelihood of driving under the influence of stimulants among individuals reporting early onset of use and among those meeting criteria for cocaine/methamphetamine use disorders. Among adults who used cocaine/methamphetamine, those who reported driving under the influence of stimulants were more than 2 times more likely to experience a depressive episode or psychological distress.
CONCLUSION
Findings suggest that prevention/treatment approaches focused on multiple substances as well as mental health needs may be most appropriate for addressing the challenge of DUIS.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35653963
pii: S0306-4603(22)00130-7
doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107364
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Central Nervous System Stimulants 0
Methamphetamine 44RAL3456C
Cocaine I5Y540LHVR

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

107364

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Auteurs

Trenette C Goings (TC)

School of Social Work, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States. Electronic address: ttclark@email.unc.edu.

Manuel Cano (M)

College for Health, Community and Policy, Department of Social Work, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States.

Christopher P Salas-Wright (CP)

School of Social Work, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, United States.

Barbara Mendez Campos (B)

School of Social Work, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, United States.

Michael G Vaughn (MG)

School of Social Work, College for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, United States; Graduate School of Social Welfare, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH