Bringing personal perspective elicitation to the heart of shared decision-making: A scoping review.

Personal perspective elicitation Preferences, values and context Scoping review Shared decision-making

Journal

Patient education and counseling
ISSN: 1873-5134
Titre abrégé: Patient Educ Couns
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 8406280

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 2022
Historique:
received: 29 11 2021
revised: 11 05 2022
accepted: 12 05 2022
pubmed: 7 6 2022
medline: 11 8 2022
entrez: 6 6 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Proponents of shared decision-making (SDM) advocate the elicitation of the patient's perspective. This scoping review explores if, and to what extent, the personal perspectives of patients are elicited during a clinical encounter, as part of a SDM process. We define personal perspective elicitation (PPE) as: the disclosure (either elicited by the clinician or spontaneously expressed by the patient) of information related to the patient's personal preferences, values and/or context. A search was conducted in five literature databases from inception dates up to July 2020, to identify empirical studies about SDM (with/without SDM instrument). The search identified 4562 abstracts; 263 articles were read in full text, resulting in 99 included studies. Studies reported low levels of PPE. Integration of personal perspectives into the conversation or a future care plan was largely absent. The majority of the discussed content related to physical health, while social and psychological topics were mostly unaddressed. PPE occurs on a very low level in efforts to achieve SDM according to evaluation studies. PPE is advocated but rarely achieved in SDM evaluation studies. Causes should be identified, followed by designing interventions to improve this aspect of SDM.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35659466
pii: S0738-3991(22)00249-X
doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.05.009
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

2860-2870

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Ester A Rake (EA)

Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Knowledge Institute of Medical Specialists, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Electronic address: ester.rake@radboudumc.nl.

Ivana C H Box (ICH)

Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Electronic address: ivana.box@radboudumc.nl.

Dunja Dreesens (D)

Knowledge Institute of Medical Specialists, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Electronic address: d.dreesens@kennisinstituut.nl.

Marjan J Meinders (MJ)

Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Electronic address: marjan.meinders@radboudumc.nl.

Jan A M Kremer (JAM)

Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Electronic address: jan.kremer@radboudumc.nl.

Johanna W M Aarts (JWM)

Department of Gynaecological oncology, Amsterdam UMC University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: j.w.m.aarts@amsterdamumc.nl.

Glyn Elwyn (G)

Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, USA. Electronic address: glynelwyn@gmail.com.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH