The impact of socio-economic deprivation on recovery following robotic assisted radical cystectomy.


Journal

Urologia
ISSN: 1724-6075
Titre abrégé: Urologia
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0417372

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2023
Historique:
medline: 5 4 2023
pubmed: 9 6 2022
entrez: 8 6 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Despite enhanced recovery programmes, length of stay is variable following robotic assisted radical cystectomy (RARC). The aim of this study was to assess the impact socioeconomic deprivation on recovery following RARC. The prospectively maintained RARC databases at two tertiary referral hospitals were reviewed from 2015 to 2017. Demographic, histological, and outcome data including length of stay (LOS), operation time and blood loss were recorded. The Index of Multiple Deprivation, was chosen as a deprivation index as this is used by the UK government to direct funding and resources to regions, towns and postal codes by assessing a number of indicators. During the study period, 340 consecutive patients underwent RARC. Deprivation deciles were significantly higher in site 1 patients (7.9 in site 1 vs 6.6 in site 2, p < 0.001) implying that these patients are more likely to have higher incomes, levels of education and improved living environments. The mean operating time was longer in the site 1 cohort (397 vs 366 min, p > 0.001) with a reduced mean blood loss volume (252 and 484 mL, p < 0.001). There was a significant difference in mean LOS (6.2 days in site 1 vs 10.6 days in site 2, p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, a higher deprivation decile did not predict LOS (OR = 1, 95% CI = 0.9-1.1, p = 0.407). Sex and operation site were however significantly associated with LOS (p = 0.006 and <0.001). Recovery following RARC was independent of socioeconomic status when comparing two hospitals with diverse catchment areas in the UK.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND UNASSIGNED
Despite enhanced recovery programmes, length of stay is variable following robotic assisted radical cystectomy (RARC). The aim of this study was to assess the impact socioeconomic deprivation on recovery following RARC.
METHODS UNASSIGNED
The prospectively maintained RARC databases at two tertiary referral hospitals were reviewed from 2015 to 2017. Demographic, histological, and outcome data including length of stay (LOS), operation time and blood loss were recorded. The Index of Multiple Deprivation, was chosen as a deprivation index as this is used by the UK government to direct funding and resources to regions, towns and postal codes by assessing a number of indicators.
RESULTS UNASSIGNED
During the study period, 340 consecutive patients underwent RARC. Deprivation deciles were significantly higher in site 1 patients (7.9 in site 1 vs 6.6 in site 2, p < 0.001) implying that these patients are more likely to have higher incomes, levels of education and improved living environments. The mean operating time was longer in the site 1 cohort (397 vs 366 min, p > 0.001) with a reduced mean blood loss volume (252 and 484 mL, p < 0.001). There was a significant difference in mean LOS (6.2 days in site 1 vs 10.6 days in site 2, p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, a higher deprivation decile did not predict LOS (OR = 1, 95% CI = 0.9-1.1, p = 0.407). Sex and operation site were however significantly associated with LOS (p = 0.006 and <0.001).
CONCLUSION UNASSIGNED
Recovery following RARC was independent of socioeconomic status when comparing two hospitals with diverse catchment areas in the UK.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35673803
doi: 10.1177/03915603221100821
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

136-140

Auteurs

Abou Chedid W (AC)

Department of Urology, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK.

Nason Gj (N)

Department of Urology, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK.

Mahesan T (M)

Department of Urology, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK.

Ashton A (A)

Department of Urology, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK.

Tay A (T)

Department of Urology, St George's Hospital, London, UK.

Walsh Al (W)

Department of Urology, St George's Hospital, London, UK.

Roodhouse A (R)

Department of Urology, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK.

Uribe-Lewis S (UL)

Department of Urology, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK.

Uribe J (U)

Department of Urology, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK.

Moschonas D (M)

Department of Urology, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK.

Issa R (I)

Department of Urology, St George's Hospital, London, UK.

Perry Mja (P)

Department of Urology, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK.

Patil K (P)

Department of Urology, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH