Exploring the environmental determinants of food choice among Haudenosaunee female youth.
Food environments
Food literacy
Indigenous
Nutrition
Social determinants
Youth
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 06 2022
09 06 2022
Historique:
received:
20
08
2021
accepted:
16
05
2022
entrez:
10
6
2022
pubmed:
11
6
2022
medline:
14
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Research on Indigenous food literacy within Canada has been focused on northern and remote communities despite the fact there are considerable and unique barriers to food access, availability, and utilization in southern Indigenous communities. Food insecurity is also a prevalent issue among Indigenous Peoples living in these more populous regions. Study objectives included investigating the determinants of food choice among youth, along with perceived opportunities that would improve food environments individually and at the community level. This community-based study used Photovoice to explore the perceptions and experiences of traditional foods and the determinants of food choice among youth in the community of Six Nations of the Grand River. Participants took photos of their local food environments, including where foods were acquired, consumed, prepared, or shared, and participated in semi-structured interviews to share the stories behind these images. Thematic analysis was used to identify patterns in participants' photos and interview content. Environmental factors were found to influence participants' traditional and everyday food choices. Built, social, economic and ecological environments were described by the youth as distinct yet inter-related determinants that converge to influence individual food choice. Built environments had a notable impact on food choice, most notably at home and in school settings. Home and family were found to be facilitators of meal consistency and healthy food choices across participants. The social environment including participants' relationships with their peers and community friends was often a barrier to healthy food choices. Eating at fast food outlets was a common social activity. The economic environment included cost deterrents associated with food choices and regular meals. The ecological environment was less of an influence and impacted the seasonal consumption of traditional and other locally harvested foods. Overall, the study findings have generated important knowledge regarding food environments and literacy and serves as a unique example of how to explore the traditional and everyday food experiences of Indigenous youth. Recommendations will inform the development of new as well as existing initiatives and resources to enhance the holistic wellbeing of youth and the broader community.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Research on Indigenous food literacy within Canada has been focused on northern and remote communities despite the fact there are considerable and unique barriers to food access, availability, and utilization in southern Indigenous communities. Food insecurity is also a prevalent issue among Indigenous Peoples living in these more populous regions. Study objectives included investigating the determinants of food choice among youth, along with perceived opportunities that would improve food environments individually and at the community level.
METHODS
This community-based study used Photovoice to explore the perceptions and experiences of traditional foods and the determinants of food choice among youth in the community of Six Nations of the Grand River. Participants took photos of their local food environments, including where foods were acquired, consumed, prepared, or shared, and participated in semi-structured interviews to share the stories behind these images. Thematic analysis was used to identify patterns in participants' photos and interview content.
RESULTS
Environmental factors were found to influence participants' traditional and everyday food choices. Built, social, economic and ecological environments were described by the youth as distinct yet inter-related determinants that converge to influence individual food choice. Built environments had a notable impact on food choice, most notably at home and in school settings. Home and family were found to be facilitators of meal consistency and healthy food choices across participants. The social environment including participants' relationships with their peers and community friends was often a barrier to healthy food choices. Eating at fast food outlets was a common social activity. The economic environment included cost deterrents associated with food choices and regular meals. The ecological environment was less of an influence and impacted the seasonal consumption of traditional and other locally harvested foods.
CONCLUSIONS
Overall, the study findings have generated important knowledge regarding food environments and literacy and serves as a unique example of how to explore the traditional and everyday food experiences of Indigenous youth. Recommendations will inform the development of new as well as existing initiatives and resources to enhance the holistic wellbeing of youth and the broader community.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35681193
doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13434-z
pii: 10.1186/s12889-022-13434-z
pmc: PMC9185972
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1156Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2015;66(4):445-51
pubmed: 25855870
Can J Public Health. 2005 Jul-Aug;96 Suppl 3:S20-6, S22-9
pubmed: 16042160
Can J Diet Pract Res. 2009 Summer;70(2):58-65
pubmed: 19515268
Annu Rev Nutr. 1996;16:417-42
pubmed: 8839933
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2015 Jan;25(1):85-92
pubmed: 25240691
Can J Public Health. 2005 Jul-Aug;96 Suppl 3:S8-14, S8-15
pubmed: 16042158
Curr Dev Nutr. 2020 Feb 05;4(3):nzaa011
pubmed: 32110768
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2014 Spring;8(1):21-7
pubmed: 24859099
Public Health Rev. 2016 Jul 20;37:2
pubmed: 29450044
Health Place. 2009 Jun;15(2):466-473
pubmed: 18930431
BMC Public Health. 2013 May 02;13:427
pubmed: 23639143
Int J Circumpolar Health. 2014 Nov 27;73:24918
pubmed: 25466760
Am J Health Behav. 2009 Nov-Dec;33(6):686-98
pubmed: 19320617
Can J Public Health. 2009 Nov-Dec;100(6):442-8
pubmed: 20209738
Physiol Behav. 2012 Jun 6;106(3):369-78
pubmed: 22480733
Child Care Health Dev. 2015 Jul;41(4):600-10
pubmed: 25074624
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2006 May 30;3:11
pubmed: 16734903
Qual Health Res. 2018 Jun;28(7):1036-1049
pubmed: 29484964
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2013 Mar;38(3):300-5
pubmed: 23537022
Ann Behav Med. 2009 Dec;38 Suppl 1:S56-73
pubmed: 19802648
Curr Dev Nutr. 2020 Jul 01;4(8):nzaa108
pubmed: 32734134
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Mar;66(6):1393-405
pubmed: 18191883
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jan 6;20(1):11
pubmed: 31906984
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 26;17(7):
pubmed: 32224950
Health Place. 2009 Jun;15(2):403-411
pubmed: 18760954
Can J Diet Pract Res. 2010 Summer;71(2):93-7
pubmed: 20525421
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2015 Jun;28(3):246-61
pubmed: 24852456
BMC Public Health. 2012 Nov 07;12:952
pubmed: 23134669
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2012 Feb;37(1):1-13
pubmed: 22269027
Can J Diabetes. 2016 Aug;40(4):304-10
pubmed: 27374251
Int J Qual Methods. 2011 Jan 1;10(2):103-124
pubmed: 27390573
Pimatisiwin. 2009 Jun 1;7(1):1
pubmed: 20150951
Sociol Health Illn. 2009 Mar;31(2):215-28
pubmed: 19220802
Int J Circumpolar Health. 2012 Mar 19;71:17344
pubmed: 22456047
Health Place. 2012 Nov;18(6):1240-7
pubmed: 23041489
J Environ Public Health. 2012;2012:130945
pubmed: 23346118