The Relationship between Phase Angle, Nutrition Status, and Complications in Patients with Pancreatic Head Cancer.
bioelectrical impedance analysis
complications
nutrition status
pancreatic head cancer
phase angle
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 05 2022
25 05 2022
Historique:
received:
30
03
2022
revised:
10
05
2022
accepted:
19
05
2022
entrez:
10
6
2022
pubmed:
11
6
2022
medline:
14
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Phase angle (PhA), a bioimpedance parameter, is used to assess the nutrition status and body composition of patients. Patients with pancreatic head cancer often present with body composition changes that relate to adverse outcomes. PhA may be useful to evaluate prognosis in these patients, but data are deficient. We aim to explore the effects of PhA on nutrition evaluation and short-term outcome prediction in these patients. This prospective study included 49 participants with pancreatic head cancer who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). All participants’ nutritional status and postoperative complications were assessed using nutrition assessment tools and the Clavien−Dindo classification method, respectively. Spearman correlation analyses were used to evaluate the association between PhA, nutrition status, and postoperative complications. ROC curves were generated to evaluate the ability of PhA to predict malnutrition and complications and to determine the cutoff value. The PhA values of the nutritional risk group and the malnourished group were significantly lower than those of the well-nourished group (p < 0.05). PhA positively correlated with patients’ nutrition status. Nineteen patients had postoperative complications, and the PhA value of the complication group was significantly lower than that of the non-complication group (4.94 vs. 5.47, p = 0.013). ROC curves showed that the cutoff point of PhA to predict malnutrition was 5.45 (AUC: 0.744), and the cutoff point of PhA to predict postoperative complications was 5.35 (AUC: 0.717). Our study indicates that PhA was associated with nutrition status and could be considered a nutrition assessment tool for pancreatic head cancer patients and predict the postoperative complications of these patients who have undergone PD.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35682009
pii: ijerph19116426
doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116426
pmc: PMC9180801
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2017 Sep;20(5):330-339
pubmed: 28548972
Dig Liver Dis. 2015 Apr;47(4):309-14
pubmed: 25618555
Nutrients. 2020 May 26;12(6):
pubmed: 32466362
Age Ageing. 2019 Jan 1;48(1):16-31
pubmed: 30312372
Am J Clin Nutr. 2005 Jul;82(1):49-52
pubmed: 16002799
Lancet. 2020 Jun 27;395(10242):2008-2020
pubmed: 32593337
HPB (Oxford). 2018 Nov;20(11):1051-1061
pubmed: 29887259
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Oct 09;13(20):
pubmed: 34680194
Clin Nutr. 2019 Aug;38(4):1700-1706
pubmed: 30170780
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2017 Aug;29(4):591-597
pubmed: 27568020
Acta Otolaryngol. 2019 Apr;139(4):383-387
pubmed: 30900483
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2017 Nov;71(11):1278-1284
pubmed: 28792014
Ann Surg. 2011 Nov;254(5):702-7; discussion 707-8
pubmed: 22042466
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2007 Sep-Oct;31(5):406-9
pubmed: 17712149
Clin Nutr. 2021 Nov;40(11):5486-5493
pubmed: 34656030
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2019 Jan;43(1):32-40
pubmed: 30175461
Nutr J. 2008 Jun 30;7:19
pubmed: 18590554
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2019 Feb;73(2):194-199
pubmed: 30297760
Gynecol Oncol. 2018 May;149(2):263-269
pubmed: 29550182
Bull Am Coll Surg. 2012 Sep;97(9):17-43
pubmed: 23002678
Clin Nutr. 2013 Jun;32(3):420-5
pubmed: 23149161
J Surg Oncol. 2013 Jun;107(7):702-8
pubmed: 23280557
Hepatology. 2000 Dec;32(6):1208-15
pubmed: 11093726
Nutrition. 2020 Nov - Dec;79-80:110891
pubmed: 32731162
Clin Nutr. 2021 Jul;40(7):4799-4806
pubmed: 34271241
Clin Nutr. 2013 Apr;32(2):294-9
pubmed: 22921419
Nutr Clin Pract. 2019 Jun;34(3):381-386
pubmed: 29870080
Clin Nutr. 2021 May;40(5):3578-3584
pubmed: 33413910
J Clin Med. 2021 Feb 02;10(3):
pubmed: 33540593
J Crit Care. 2018 Apr;44:430-435
pubmed: 29353120
Front Oncol. 2021 Nov 30;11:748341
pubmed: 34917503
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2016 Dec;28(6):1121-1126
pubmed: 26786583
Surg Today. 2018 May;48(5):545-551
pubmed: 29285616
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2020 Mar;74(3):419-426
pubmed: 31388102
Eur J Radiol. 2016 Aug;85(8):1456-60
pubmed: 26564096
J Med Invest. 2015;62(3-4):119-22
pubmed: 26399333
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2006 Jul-Aug;30(4):309-16
pubmed: 16804128
Br J Surg. 2017 Jul;104(8):1053-1062
pubmed: 28369809
Clin Nutr. 2004 Oct;23(5):1226-43
pubmed: 15380917
Clin Nutr. 2003 Aug;22(4):415-21
pubmed: 12880610
Ann Surg. 2009 Aug;250(2):187-96
pubmed: 19638912
Clin Nutr. 2012 Dec;31(6):854-61
pubmed: 22698802
Nutrients. 2017 Mar 07;9(3):
pubmed: 28272344
Nutr Clin Pract. 2015 Apr;30(2):180-93
pubmed: 25613832
Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2012 Nov;15(6):1180-4
pubmed: 23653848