Change of In-Shoe Plantar Pressure According to Types of Shoes (Flat Shoes, Running Shoes, and High Heels).
Foot
Pedobarography
Pressure
Shoes
Journal
Clinics in orthopedic surgery
ISSN: 2005-4408
Titre abrégé: Clin Orthop Surg
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101505087
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2022
Jun 2022
Historique:
received:
25
10
2020
revised:
21
12
2021
accepted:
27
12
2021
entrez:
10
6
2022
pubmed:
11
6
2022
medline:
14
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The type of footwear is one of several factors that affect foot pressure. Despite its usefulness in identifying pathology and preventing and treating foot-related diseases, the type of shoes has been investigated and compared in only a few studies. This study aimed to investigate differences in plantar pressure, induced by flat, running, and high-heeled shoes in healthy, young women. A total of 27 healthy women (27 feet) with a mean age of 21.5 ± 2.03 years were included in this study. Based on demographic data, radiologic measurements, clinical scores, temporal gait parameters, and kinematic parameters of gait, we confirmed the participants had normal feet. Then, pedobarographic data were measured by dividing each foot into seven regions to compare the three types of shoes. Peak plantar pressure and pressure-time integral were calculated using the Pedar-X system. The one-way analysis of variance and the Kruskal-Wallis test with Mann Whitney Regarding the 7 regions of the foot, flat shoes resulted in a significantly higher pressure than running shoes in the hallux and lesser toes and the highest pressure in the metatarsal head (MTH) 3-5 and the hindfoot. In contrast, in the MTH 1 and MTH 2 regions, the high-heeled shoes had the highest measured pressure, followed by the flat shoes. Lastly, there was no high pressure in running shoes in any region except for the midfoot compared to the other shoes. It can be inferred from our findings that flat and high-heeled shoes can generate a considerable burden on specific parts of the foot, which will aid in choosing appropriate shoes. Also, wearing running shoes places less burden on the overall foot.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
The type of footwear is one of several factors that affect foot pressure. Despite its usefulness in identifying pathology and preventing and treating foot-related diseases, the type of shoes has been investigated and compared in only a few studies. This study aimed to investigate differences in plantar pressure, induced by flat, running, and high-heeled shoes in healthy, young women.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
A total of 27 healthy women (27 feet) with a mean age of 21.5 ± 2.03 years were included in this study. Based on demographic data, radiologic measurements, clinical scores, temporal gait parameters, and kinematic parameters of gait, we confirmed the participants had normal feet. Then, pedobarographic data were measured by dividing each foot into seven regions to compare the three types of shoes. Peak plantar pressure and pressure-time integral were calculated using the Pedar-X system. The one-way analysis of variance and the Kruskal-Wallis test with Mann Whitney
Results
UNASSIGNED
Regarding the 7 regions of the foot, flat shoes resulted in a significantly higher pressure than running shoes in the hallux and lesser toes and the highest pressure in the metatarsal head (MTH) 3-5 and the hindfoot. In contrast, in the MTH 1 and MTH 2 regions, the high-heeled shoes had the highest measured pressure, followed by the flat shoes. Lastly, there was no high pressure in running shoes in any region except for the midfoot compared to the other shoes.
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
It can be inferred from our findings that flat and high-heeled shoes can generate a considerable burden on specific parts of the foot, which will aid in choosing appropriate shoes. Also, wearing running shoes places less burden on the overall foot.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35685969
doi: 10.4055/cios20260
pmc: PMC9152888
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
281-288Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 by The Korean Orthopaedic Association.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Références
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1989 Feb;21(1):23-8
pubmed: 2927297
Phys Ther. 2008 Nov;88(11):1375-84
pubmed: 18801862
Int J Ther Massage Bodywork. 2012;5(2):12-9
pubmed: 22811757
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2009 May;47(5):475-86
pubmed: 19221823
Gait Posture. 1999 Dec;10(3):248-54
pubmed: 10567757
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Apr;(409):175-85
pubmed: 12671500
Gerontology. 2005 Sep-Oct;51(5):346-51
pubmed: 16110238
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016 Sep;68(9):1232-8
pubmed: 26713755
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2005 Nov;20(9):877-82
pubmed: 15882916
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2006 May-Jun;96(3):205-11
pubmed: 16707631
Acta Inform Med. 2014 Dec;22(6):374-8
pubmed: 25684844
J Orthop Sci. 2016 Nov;21(6):804-809
pubmed: 27727048
Int J Sports Med. 1988 Dec;9(6):468-73
pubmed: 3253241
Gait Posture. 2007 Mar;25(3):401-5
pubmed: 16828288
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1999 Feb;89(2):75-80
pubmed: 10063777
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2013 Jul;28(6):679-85
pubmed: 23731579
Diabetes Care. 2002 Jun;25(6):1066-71
pubmed: 12032116
Med Eng Phys. 2016 Sep;38(9):845-53
pubmed: 27212210
Emerg Nurse. 2010 Sep;18(5):16-7
pubmed: 20882801
J Sci Med Sport. 2015 Jul;18(4):463-8
pubmed: 25024135
Am J Sports Med. 2008 Nov;36(11):2139-46
pubmed: 18577583
Gait Posture. 2014 Sep;40(4):682-7
pubmed: 25161007
J Foot Ankle Res. 2014 Apr 22;7:24
pubmed: 24782914
Foot Ankle Int. 2006 Feb;27(2):117-20
pubmed: 16487464
Hum Mov Sci. 2015 Jun;41:307-19
pubmed: 25910862
J Biomed Eng. 1981 Apr;3(2):91-9
pubmed: 7230763