Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on breast cancer screening indicators in a Spanish population-based program: a cohort study.
COVID-19
breast neoplasm
early detection of cancer
epidemiology
global health
human
nonrandomized controlled trials
quality indicators
Journal
eLife
ISSN: 2050-084X
Titre abrégé: Elife
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101579614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 06 2022
10 06 2022
Historique:
received:
29
01
2022
accepted:
09
06
2022
pubmed:
11
6
2022
medline:
23
6
2022
entrez:
10
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To assess the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on performance indicators in the population-based breast cancer screening program of Parc de Salut Mar (PSMAR), Barcelona, Spain. We conducted a before-and-after, study to evaluate participation, recall, false positives, the cancer detection rate, and cancer characteristics in our screening population from March 2020 to March 2021 compared with the four previous rounds (2012-2019). Using multilevel logistic regression models, we estimated the adjusted odds ratios (aORs) of each of the performance indicators for the COVID-19 period, controlling by type of screening (prevalent or incident), socioeconomic index, family history of breast cancer, and menopausal status. We analyzed 144,779 invitations from 47,571women. During the COVID-19 period, the odds of participation were lower in first-time invitees (aOR = 0.90 [95% CI = 0.84-0.96]) and in those who had previously participated regularly and irregularly (aOR = 0.63 [95% CI = 0.59-0.67] and aOR = 0.95 [95% CI = 0.86-1.05], respectively). Participation showed a modest increase in women not attending any of the previous rounds (aOR = 1.10 [95% CI = 1.01-1.20]). The recall rate decreased in both prevalent and incident screening (aOR = 0.74 [95% CI = 0.56-0.99] and aOR = 0.80 [95% CI = 0.68-0.95], respectively). False positives also decreased in both groups (prevalent aOR = 0.92 [95% CI = 0.66-1.28] and incident aOR = 0.72 [95% CI = 0.59-0.88]). No significant differences were observed in compliance with recall (OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 0.76-2.23), cancer detection rate (aOR = 0.91 [95% CI = 0.69-1.18]), or cancer stages. The COVID-19 pandemic negatively affected screening attendance, especially in previous participants and newcomers. We found a reduction in recall and false positives and no marked differences in cancer detection, indicating the robustness of the program. There is a need for further evaluations of interval cancers and potential diagnostic delays. This study has received funding by grants PI19/00007 and PI21/00058, funded by Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) and cofunded by the European Union and Grant RD21/0016/0020 funded by Instituto de Salud Carlos III and by the European Union NextGenerationEU, Mecanismo para la Recuperación y la Resiliencia (MRR).
Sections du résumé
Background
To assess the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on performance indicators in the population-based breast cancer screening program of Parc de Salut Mar (PSMAR), Barcelona, Spain.
Methods
We conducted a before-and-after, study to evaluate participation, recall, false positives, the cancer detection rate, and cancer characteristics in our screening population from March 2020 to March 2021 compared with the four previous rounds (2012-2019). Using multilevel logistic regression models, we estimated the adjusted odds ratios (aORs) of each of the performance indicators for the COVID-19 period, controlling by type of screening (prevalent or incident), socioeconomic index, family history of breast cancer, and menopausal status. We analyzed 144,779 invitations from 47,571women.
Results
During the COVID-19 period, the odds of participation were lower in first-time invitees (aOR = 0.90 [95% CI = 0.84-0.96]) and in those who had previously participated regularly and irregularly (aOR = 0.63 [95% CI = 0.59-0.67] and aOR = 0.95 [95% CI = 0.86-1.05], respectively). Participation showed a modest increase in women not attending any of the previous rounds (aOR = 1.10 [95% CI = 1.01-1.20]). The recall rate decreased in both prevalent and incident screening (aOR = 0.74 [95% CI = 0.56-0.99] and aOR = 0.80 [95% CI = 0.68-0.95], respectively). False positives also decreased in both groups (prevalent aOR = 0.92 [95% CI = 0.66-1.28] and incident aOR = 0.72 [95% CI = 0.59-0.88]). No significant differences were observed in compliance with recall (OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 0.76-2.23), cancer detection rate (aOR = 0.91 [95% CI = 0.69-1.18]), or cancer stages.
Conclusions
The COVID-19 pandemic negatively affected screening attendance, especially in previous participants and newcomers. We found a reduction in recall and false positives and no marked differences in cancer detection, indicating the robustness of the program. There is a need for further evaluations of interval cancers and potential diagnostic delays.
Funding
This study has received funding by grants PI19/00007 and PI21/00058, funded by Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) and cofunded by the European Union and Grant RD21/0016/0020 funded by Instituto de Salud Carlos III and by the European Union NextGenerationEU, Mecanismo para la Recuperación y la Resiliencia (MRR).
Identifiants
pubmed: 35686727
doi: 10.7554/eLife.77434
pii: 77434
pmc: PMC9212994
doi:
pii:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2022, Bosch et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
GB, MP, JL, MR, MP, XC, FM No competing interests declared
Références
BMC Cancer. 2020 Aug 24;20(1):795
pubmed: 32831048
J Med Screen. 2021 Jun;28(2):100-107
pubmed: 33241760
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 12;18(8):
pubmed: 33921238
Scand J Public Health. 2021 Nov;49(7):700-706
pubmed: 33764227
Nat Med. 2021 Jun;27(6):964-980
pubmed: 34002090
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jun 28;13(13):
pubmed: 34203185
Soc Sci Med. 1995 Apr;40(8):1155-60
pubmed: 7597469
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Nov;30(11):1667-1671
pubmed: 33033166
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Aug;189(1):237-246
pubmed: 34032985
Cancer. 2020 Dec 15;126(24):5202-5205
pubmed: 32914864
Epidemiol Prev. 2020 Sep-Dec;44(5-6 Suppl 2):344-352
pubmed: 33412828
J Med Screen. 2017 Sep;24(3):127-145
pubmed: 27754937
Epidemiol Prev. 2015 May-Jun;39(3 Suppl 1):30-9
pubmed: 26405774
Prev Med. 2021 Oct;151:106642
pubmed: 34217420
Health Serv Res. 2021 Feb;56(1):95-101
pubmed: 33146429
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e2110946
pubmed: 34028552
Prev Med. 2001 Oct;33(4):325-32
pubmed: 11570837
J Hematol Oncol. 2020 Nov 4;13(1):147
pubmed: 33148289
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 30;11(11):e046660
pubmed: 34848507
Eur Radiol. 2022 Jan;32(1):621-629
pubmed: 34156554
Radiol Med. 2020 Oct;125(10):926-930
pubmed: 32661780
BMJ. 2021 May 7;373:n1179
pubmed: 33962972
Breast Cancer. 2021 Nov;28(6):1340-1345
pubmed: 34241799
J Pers Med. 2021 May 06;11(5):
pubmed: 34066425
CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Jul 8;67(4):290-303
pubmed: 28294295
Br J Cancer. 2017 May 23;116(11):1480-1485
pubmed: 28427083
JAMA Oncol. 2021 Jun 1;7(6):878-884
pubmed: 33914015
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 14;6(11):e013728
pubmed: 28186949
In Vivo. 2020 Sep-Oct;34(5):3047-3053
pubmed: 32871851
Arch Bronconeumol (Engl Ed). 2020 Nov;56(11):756-758
pubmed: 32782092
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 12;11(1):16443
pubmed: 34385482
Elife. 2021 Jun 30;10:
pubmed: 34190045
Int Nurs Rev. 2021 Dec;68(4):461-470
pubmed: 34097305