Predominance of Clostridioides difficile PCR ribotype 181 in northern Greece, 2016-2019.
Clostridioides difficile
Greece
PCR-Ribotyping
RT181
Toxin genes profile
Journal
Anaerobe
ISSN: 1095-8274
Titre abrégé: Anaerobe
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9505216
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2022
Aug 2022
Historique:
received:
18
12
2021
revised:
22
05
2022
accepted:
03
06
2022
pubmed:
11
6
2022
medline:
14
9
2022
entrez:
10
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The epidemiology of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) has undergone many changes since the beginning of this century and continues to evolve based on recent studies. Here, we performed a molecular analysis of C. difficile isolates in northern Greece across 10 health-care facilities, spanning from 2016 to 2019. 221 C. difficile isolates were cultured from stool samples of hospitalized patients with diarrhea and screened by PCR for the presence of the toxin A (tcdA), toxin B (tcdB), the binary toxin (cdtA and cdtB) genes and the regulating gene of tcdC. PCR ribotyping of the cultured isolates was performed by a standardized protocol for capillary gel-based PCR ribotyping and an international database with well-documented reference strains. Thirty-five different PCR ribotypes were identified. The most common RTs identified were: 181 (36%, 80/221), 017 (10%, 21/221), 126 (9%, 19/221), 078 (4%, 9/221) and 012 (4%, 8/221). Notably, the predominant RT181, with toxin profile tcdA Multiple C. difficile ribotypes have been circulating in the northern Greece region with RTs 181 (closely related to 027), 017, 126 and 078 being predominant.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35688364
pii: S1075-9964(22)00092-0
doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2022.102601
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Bacterial Proteins
0
Bacterial Toxins
0
Enterotoxins
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
102601Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest None of the authors has a conflict of interest.