Cavitation bubble interaction with compliant structures on a microscale: A contribution to the understanding of bacterial cell lysis by cavitation treatment.
Bacteria
Bubble dynamics
Cavitation
Fluid–structure interaction
Water treatment
Journal
Ultrasonics sonochemistry
ISSN: 1873-2828
Titre abrégé: Ultrason Sonochem
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9433356
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2022
Jun 2022
Historique:
received:
21
03
2022
revised:
17
05
2022
accepted:
30
05
2022
pubmed:
12
6
2022
medline:
23
6
2022
entrez:
11
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Numerous studies have already shown that the process of cavitation can be successfully used for water treatment and eradication of bacteria. However, most of the relevant studies are being conducted on a macro scale, so the understanding of the processes at a fundamental level remains poor. In attempt to further elucidate the process of cavitation-assisted water treatment on a scale of a single bubble, the present paper numerically addresses interaction between a collapsing microbubble and a nearby compliant structure, that mechanically and structurally resembles a bacterial cell. A fluid-structure interaction methodology is employed, where compressible multiphase flow is considered and the bacterial cell wall is modeled as a multi-layered shell structure. Simulations are performed for two selected model structures, each resembling the main structural features of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacterial cell envelopes. The contribution of two independent dimensionless geometric parameters is investigated, namely the bubble-cell distance δ and their size ratio ς. Three characteristic modes of bubble collapse dynamics and four modes of spatiotemporal occurrence of peak local stresses in the bacterial cell membrane are identified throughout the parameter space considered. The former range from the development of a weak and thin jet away from the cell to spherical bubble collapses. The results show that local stresses arising from bubble-induced loads can exceed poration thresholds of cell membranes and that bacterial cell damage could be explained solely by mechanical effects in absence of thermal and chemical ones. Based on this, the damage potential of a single microbubble for bacteria eradication is estimated, showing a higher resistance of the Gram-positive model organism to the nearby bubble collapse. Microstreaming is identified as the primary mechanical mechanism of bacterial cell damage, which in certain cases may be enhanced by the occurrence of shock waves during bubble collapse. The results are also discussed in the scope of bacteria eradication by cavitation treatment on a macro scale, where processes of hydrodynamic and ultrasonic cavitation are being employed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35690044
pii: S1350-4177(22)00146-8
doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2022.106053
pmc: PMC9190065
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
106053Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Références
Science. 1990 Mar 23;247(4949):1439-45
pubmed: 17791211
Cell Syst. 2016 Jun 22;2(6):402-11
pubmed: 27321372
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Apr 22;111(16):5778-83
pubmed: 24711421
Ultramicroscopy. 2008 Sep;108(10):1128-34
pubmed: 18556125
Biophys J. 2004 Apr;86(4):2156-64
pubmed: 15041656
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014 Mar;1838(3):994-1002
pubmed: 24374317
Nature. 2003 May 8;423(6936):153-6
pubmed: 12736680
Ultrason Sonochem. 2022 Jan;82:105898
pubmed: 34973580
J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Mar;117(3 Pt 1):1440-7
pubmed: 15807031
Lab Chip. 2013 Mar 21;13(6):1144-50
pubmed: 23364762
Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr. 2018 Dec;1860(12):2566-2575
pubmed: 30278180
Ultrason Sonochem. 2008 Mar;15(3):203-11
pubmed: 17532249
Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2019 Oct;272:101995
pubmed: 31394435
Lab Chip. 2007 Dec;7(12):1666-72
pubmed: 18030385
Ultrason Sonochem. 2016 Mar;29:528-49
pubmed: 25982895
Ultrason Sonochem. 2020 Nov;68:105224
pubmed: 32554294
Nature. 2018 Jul;559(7715):617-621
pubmed: 30022160
J Control Release. 2012 Jan 10;157(1):103-11
pubmed: 21945682
Interface Focus. 2015 Oct 6;5(5):20150016
pubmed: 26442140
Ultrason Sonochem. 2017 Nov;39:863-871
pubmed: 28733016
Interface Focus. 2015 Oct 6;5(5):20150017
pubmed: 26442141
Lab Chip. 2012 Feb 21;12(4):780-6
pubmed: 22183135
Biophys J. 2003 Oct;85(4):2342-50
pubmed: 14507698
Ultrason Sonochem. 2018 Apr;42:228-236
pubmed: 29429664
Q Rev Biophys. 1991 Aug;24(3):293-397
pubmed: 1749824
Ultrason Sonochem. 2020 Mar;61:104826
pubmed: 31670247
Ultrason Sonochem. 2021 Oct;78:105706
pubmed: 34411844
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Feb 1;806(Pt 4):151414
pubmed: 34742970
Ultrason Sonochem. 2016 Mar;29:577-88
pubmed: 26515938
Ultrason Sonochem. 2019 Oct;57:147-165
pubmed: 31208610
Biophys J. 2000 Jul;79(1):321-7
pubmed: 10866958
Ultrason Sonochem. 2022 Feb;83:105919
pubmed: 35077964
Mol Microbiol. 2012 Jun;84(5):874-91
pubmed: 22548341
Arch Microbiol. 1995 Aug;164(2):155-7
pubmed: 8588736
Biophys J. 2000 Jul;79(1):328-39
pubmed: 10866959
Cell. 2014 Jan 16;156(1-2):183-94
pubmed: 24361104
Ultrason Sonochem. 2020 Dec;69:105252
pubmed: 32682313
PLoS Comput Biol. 2014 Feb 20;10(2):e1003475
pubmed: 24586129
Phys Rev Lett. 2011 Oct 7;107(15):158101
pubmed: 22107320
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012 May;1818(5):1205-10
pubmed: 22274566
Faraday Discuss. 2013;161:591-611
pubmed: 23805759
J Hydrodynam B. 2012 Apr;24(2):169-183
pubmed: 22833696
APL Bioeng. 2020 Apr 01;4(2):021501
pubmed: 32266323
Adv Microb Physiol. 1991;32:173-222
pubmed: 1882728
Interface Focus. 2015 Oct 6;5(5):20150022
pubmed: 26442145
Water Res. 2017 Nov 1;124:465-471
pubmed: 28800517
J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Jan;129(1):122-31
pubmed: 21302994