Diagnosing Prescription Opioid Use Disorder in Patients Using Prescribed Opioids for Chronic Pain.
Addiction Psychiatry
Epidemiology
Opioids
Pain
Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders
Journal
The American journal of psychiatry
ISSN: 1535-7228
Titre abrégé: Am J Psychiatry
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370512
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2022
10 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
16
6
2022
medline:
5
10
2022
entrez:
15
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The diagnostic criteria for opioid use disorder, originally developed for heroin, did not anticipate the surge in prescription opioid use and the resulting complexities in diagnosing prescription opioid use disorder (POUD), including differentiation of pain relief (therapeutic intent) from more common drug use motives, such as to get high or to cope with negative affect. The authors examined the validity of the Psychiatric Research Interview for Substance and Mental Disorders, DSM-5 opioid version, an instrument designed to make this differentiation. Patients (N=606) from pain clinics and inpatient substance treatment who ever received a ≥30-day opioid prescription for chronic pain were evaluated for DSM-5 POUD (i.e., withdrawal and tolerance were not considered positive if patients used opioids only as prescribed, per DSM-5 guidelines) and pain-adjusted POUD (behavioral/subjective criteria were not considered positive if pain relief [therapeutic intent] was the sole motive). Bivariate correlated-outcome regression models indicated associations of 10 validators with DSM-5 and pain-adjusted POUD measures, using mean ratios for dimensional measures and odds ratios for binary measures. The prevalences of DSM-5 and pain-adjusted POUD, respectively, were 44.4% and 30.4% at the ≥2-criteria threshold and 29.5% and 25.3% at the ≥4-criteria threshold. Pain adjustment had little effect on prevalence among substance treatment patients but resulted in substantially lower prevalence among pain treatment patients. All validators had significantly stronger associations with pain-adjusted than with DSM-5 dimensional POUD measures (ratios of mean ratios, 1.22-2.31). For most validators, pain-adjusted binary POUD had larger odds ratios than DSM-5 measures. Adapting POUD measures for pain relief (therapeutic intent) improved validity. Studies should investigate the clinical utility of differentiating between therapeutic and nontherapeutic intent in evaluating POUD diagnostic criteria.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35702830
doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.21070721
doi:
Substances chimiques
Analgesics, Opioid
0
Heroin
70D95007SX
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02660619']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
715-725Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn