Maternal hemodynamics and computerized cardiotocography during labor with epidural analgesia.
Analgesia
Cardiotocography
Hemodynamics
Labor
Journal
Archives of gynecology and obstetrics
ISSN: 1432-0711
Titre abrégé: Arch Gynecol Obstet
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8710213
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2023
06 2023
Historique:
received:
20
04
2022
accepted:
01
06
2022
medline:
1
5
2023
pubmed:
16
6
2022
entrez:
15
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To analyze the mechanisms involved in the fetal heart rate (FHR) abnormalities after the epidural analgesia in labor. A prospective unblinded single-center observational study on 55 term singleton pregnant women with spontaneous labor. All women recruited underwent serial bedside measurements of the main hemodynamic parameters using a non-invasive ultrasound system (USCOM-1A). Total vascular resistances (TVR), heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO) and arterial blood pressure were measured before epidural administration (T0), after 5 min 5 (T1) from epidural bolus and at the end of the first stage of labor (T2). FHR was continuously recorded through computerized cardiotocography before and after the procedure. The starting CO was significantly higher in a subgroup of women with low TVR than in women with high-TVR group. After the bolus of epidural analgesia in the low-TVR group there was a significant reduction in CO and then increased again at the end of the first stage, in the high-TVR group the CO increased insignificantly after the anesthesia bolus, while it increased significantly in the remaining part of the first stage of labor. On the other hand, CO was inversely correlated with the number of decelerations detected on cCTG in the 1 hour after the epidural bolus while the short-term variation was significantly lower in the group with high-TVR. Maternal hemodynamic status at the onset of labor can make a difference in fetal response to the administration of epidural analgesia.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35704115
doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06658-2
pii: 10.1007/s00404-022-06658-2
pmc: PMC10147743
doi:
Types de publication
Observational Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1789-1794Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 3;15(8):e0236982
pubmed: 32745099
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Oct;161(4):974-7
pubmed: 2801847
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jan;49(1):32-38
pubmed: 26970353
Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jan;113(1):41-47
pubmed: 19104358
Pregnancy Hypertens. 2015 Apr;5(2):193-7
pubmed: 25943644
BJOG. 2010 Jun;117(7):837-44
pubmed: 20353457
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(12):1980-6
pubmed: 26333691
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(6):711-4
pubmed: 17520404
J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Nov 23;4(11):
pubmed: 26597153
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2021 Feb;45:83-89
pubmed: 33298344
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 21;5:CD000331
pubmed: 29781504
Anesth Analg. 2016 Oct;123(4):955-64
pubmed: 27509225
J Perinatol. 2017 May;37(5):484-487
pubmed: 28151494
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2011 Jan;20(1):38-50
pubmed: 21146977
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;220(1):96.e1-96.e8
pubmed: 30243605
Br Heart J. 1992 Dec;68(6):540-3
pubmed: 1467047
Am J Perinatol. 2002 Apr;19(3):119-26
pubmed: 12012286
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2008 Feb;37 Suppl 1:S46-55
pubmed: 18191340
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Apr;51(4):509-513
pubmed: 28236342
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1987 Dec;94(12):1150-5
pubmed: 3322373
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct;48(4):491-495
pubmed: 26952308
Pregnancy Hypertens. 2017 Oct;10:131-134
pubmed: 29153665
J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1970 Jan;77(1):29-36
pubmed: 5419868
Anesth Analg. 2004 Apr;98(4):1153-1159
pubmed: 15041616
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Jan;162(1):121-5
pubmed: 2301480
Hypertension. 2019 Mar;73(3):522-531
pubmed: 30712425
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2017 May;31:74-83
pubmed: 28404439