Improving Patient Safety and Quality in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Through Participation in the American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Continuing Certification Program.
Journal
American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation
ISSN: 1537-7385
Titre abrégé: Am J Phys Med Rehabil
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8803677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 07 2022
01 07 2022
Historique:
entrez:
16
6
2022
pubmed:
17
6
2022
medline:
18
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The American Board of Medical Specialties Continuing Certification Program's Improvement in Medical Practice Standard requires physicians to participate in practice improvement activities. Despite this universal requirement, there has been no assessment of this requirement or its potential impact on patient care. Because of its continuing certification oversight structure, the American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation is in a unique position to provide this assessment. Review of quality improvement projects submitted to the American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation for continuing certification compliance revealed that most diplomates (70.1%) used available topic-specific options. These projects are designed to be directive and easy to use for physicians with limited quality improvement experience. Examples of topic-directed project potential impact on patient care include preventing wrong-site injections through implementing a preprocedure timeout or decreasing opioid prescribing risk through implementation of an opioid risk assessment tool. Thirty percent of submissions described improvement efforts in other areas of practice. These projects were directed toward areas of patient care including safety, communication/education, satisfaction, processes, and outcomes. This study demonstrates the efforts of physiatrists to improve care and the potential impact of these efforts on patient care and safety through participation in continuing certification.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35706112
doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002022
pii: 00002060-202207001-00003
doi:
Substances chimiques
Analgesics, Opioid
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
S10-S14Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Financial disclosure statements have been obtained, and no conflicts of interest have been reported by the authors or by any individuals in control of the content of this article.
Références
Institute of Medicine Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS (eds): in: To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System . Washington, National Academies Press, 2000
Institute of Medicine Committee on Quality of Health Care in America: Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century . Washington, National Academics Press, 2001
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education: Common program requirements. Available at: https://acgme.org/What-We-Do/Accreditation/Common-Program-Requirements . Accessed February 22, 2021
Standards for the American Board of Medical Specialty Program for Maintenance of Certification. Available at: https://www.abms.org/media/1109/ . Accessed August 19, 2020
Guo M, Tardif G, Bayley M: Medical safety hurdles in rehabilitation: a novel patient strategy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2018;99:1217–9
Cohen SP, Hayek SM, Datta S, et al.: Incidence and root cause analysis of wrong-site pain management procedures: a multicenter study. Anesthesiology 2010;112:711–8
Barrington MJ, Uda Y, Pattullo SJ, et al.: Wrong-site regional anesthesia: review and recommendations for prevention. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2015;28:670–84
Hudson ME, Chelly JE, Lichter JR: Wrong-site nerve blocks: 10 yr experience in a large multihospital health-care system. Br J Anaesth 2015;114:818–24
Deutsch ES, Yonash RA, Martin DE, et al.: Wrong-site nerve blocks: a systematic literature review to guide principles for prevention. J Clin Anesth 2018;46:101–11
Henshaw DS, Turner JD, Dobson SW, et al.: Preprocedure checklist for regional anesthesia: impact on the incidence of wrong site nerve blockade (an 8-year perspective). Reg Anesth Pain Med 2019;44:201–5
The Joint Commission: National patient safety goals effective January 2021 for the ambulatory health care program. Available at: https://www.jointcommission.org/-/media/tjc/documents/standards/national-patient-safety-goals/2021/ahc_npsg_jan2021.pdf . Updated October 28, 2020. Accessed February 17, 2021
Gao MC, Martin PB, Motal J, et al.: A multidisciplinary discharge timeout checklist improves patient education and captures discharge process errors. Qual Manag Health Care 2018;27:63–8
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: CDC guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic pain—United States. 2016. n. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/65/rr/rr6501e1.htm . Updated March 18, 2016. Accessed February 17, 2021
Guy GP Jr., Zhang K: Opioid prescribing by specialty and volume in the U.S. Am J Prev Med 2018;55:e153–5
Ducharme J, Moore S: Opioid use disorder assessment tools and drug screening. Mo Med 2019;116:318–24
Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients with Pain-Revised (SOAPPR-R). DKBmed for Health Care Providers . Available at: https://nationalpaincentre.mcmaster.ca/documents/soapp_r_sample_watermark.pdf . Accessed February 17, 2021
Linzer M, Poplau S, Grossman E, et al.: A cluster randomized trial of interventions to improve work conditions and clinician burnout in primary care: results from the Healthy Work Place (HWP) study. J Gen Intern Med 2015;30:1105–11