Exploring Aspartic Protease Inhibitor Binding to Design Selective Antimalarials.


Journal

Journal of chemical information and modeling
ISSN: 1549-960X
Titre abrégé: J Chem Inf Model
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101230060

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 07 2022
Historique:
pubmed: 18 6 2022
medline: 14 7 2022
entrez: 17 6 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Selectivity is a major issue in the development of drugs targeting pathogen aspartic proteases. Here, we explore the selectivity-determining factors by studying specifically designed malaria aspartic protease (plasmepsin) open-flap inhibitors. Metadynamics simulations are used to uncover the complex binding/unbinding pathways of these inhibitors and describe the critical transition states in atomistic resolution. The simulation results are compared with experimentally determined enzymatic activities. Our findings demonstrate that plasmepsin inhibitor selectivity can be achieved by targeting the flap loop with hydrophobic substituents that enable ligand binding under the flap loop, as such a behavior is not observed for several other aspartic proteases. The ability to estimate the selectivity of compounds before they are synthesized is of considerable importance in drug design; therefore, we expect that our approach will be useful in selective inhibitor designs against not only aspartic proteases but also other enzyme classes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35712895
doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.2c00422
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antimalarials 0
Protease Inhibitors 0
Protozoan Proteins 0
Aspartic Acid Endopeptidases EC 3.4.23.-

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

3263-3273

Auteurs

Raitis Bobrovs (R)

Latvian Institute of Organic Synthesis, Aizkraukles 21, Riga LV1006, Latvia.

Emils Edgars Basens (EE)

Latvian Institute of Organic Synthesis, Aizkraukles 21, Riga LV1006, Latvia.

Laura Drunka (L)

Latvian Institute of Organic Synthesis, Aizkraukles 21, Riga LV1006, Latvia.

Iveta Kanepe (I)

Latvian Institute of Organic Synthesis, Aizkraukles 21, Riga LV1006, Latvia.

Sofija Matisone (S)

Latvian Institute of Organic Synthesis, Aizkraukles 21, Riga LV1006, Latvia.

Karlis Kristofers Velins (KK)

Latvian Institute of Organic Synthesis, Aizkraukles 21, Riga LV1006, Latvia.

Victor Andrianov (V)

Latvian Institute of Organic Synthesis, Aizkraukles 21, Riga LV1006, Latvia.

Gundars Leitis (G)

Latvian Institute of Organic Synthesis, Aizkraukles 21, Riga LV1006, Latvia.

Diana Zelencova-Gopejenko (D)

Latvian Institute of Organic Synthesis, Aizkraukles 21, Riga LV1006, Latvia.

Dace Rasina (D)

Latvian Institute of Organic Synthesis, Aizkraukles 21, Riga LV1006, Latvia.

Aigars Jirgensons (A)

Latvian Institute of Organic Synthesis, Aizkraukles 21, Riga LV1006, Latvia.

Kristaps Jaudzems (K)

Latvian Institute of Organic Synthesis, Aizkraukles 21, Riga LV1006, Latvia.

Articles similaires

Humans Meta-Analysis as Topic Sample Size Models, Statistical Computer Simulation
Alzheimer Disease Humans Regression Analysis Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Drug Design
Humans Algorithms Software Artificial Intelligence Computer Simulation
Eimeria tenella Animals Antigens, Protozoan Chickens Genetic Variation

Classifications MeSH