Ensemble Approaches to Recognize Protected Health Information in Radiology Reports.
De-identification
Ensemble models
Machine learning
Natural language processing
Protected health information (PHI)
Reporting
Journal
Journal of digital imaging
ISSN: 1618-727X
Titre abrégé: J Digit Imaging
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9100529
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2022
12 2022
Historique:
received:
29
03
2022
accepted:
07
06
2022
revised:
02
06
2022
pubmed:
18
6
2022
medline:
3
12
2022
entrez:
17
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Natural language processing (NLP) techniques for electronic health records have shown great potential to improve the quality of medical care. The text of radiology reports frequently constitutes a large fraction of EHR data, and can provide valuable information about patients' diagnoses, medical history, and imaging findings. The lack of a major public repository for radiological reports severely limits the development, testing, and application of new NLP tools. De-identification of protected health information (PHI) presents a major challenge to building such repositories, as many automated tools for de-identification were trained or designed for clinical notes and do not perform sufficiently well to build a public database of radiology reports. We developed and evaluated six ensemble models based on three publically available de-identification tools: MIT de-id, NeuroNER, and Philter. A set of 1023 reports was set aside as the testing partition. Two individuals with medical training annotated the test set for PHI; differences were resolved by consensus. Ensemble methods included simple voting schemes (1-Vote, 2-Votes, and 3-Votes), a decision tree, a naïve Bayesian classifier, and Adaboost boosting. The 1-Vote ensemble achieved recall of 998 / 1043 (95.7%); the 3-Votes ensemble had precision of 1035 / 1043 (99.2%). F1 scores were: 93.4% for the decision tree, 71.2% for the naïve Bayesian classifier, and 87.5% for the boosting method. Basic voting algorithms and machine learning classifiers incorporating the predictions of multiple tools can outperform each tool acting alone in de-identifying radiology reports. Ensemble methods hold substantial potential to improve automated de-identification tools for radiology reports to make such reports more available for research use to improve patient care and outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35715655
doi: 10.1007/s10278-022-00673-0
pii: 10.1007/s10278-022-00673-0
pmc: PMC9712864
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1694-1698Subventions
Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : T32 EB009384
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine.
Références
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jan 1;20(1):77-83
pubmed: 22947391
J Digit Imaging. 2013 Dec;26(6):1045-57
pubmed: 23884657
Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2020 Nov;30(4):447-458
pubmed: 33038995
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018 Apr 16;2017:1070-1079
pubmed: 29854175
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Mar 1;27(3):457-470
pubmed: 31794016
Radiology. 2016 May;279(2):329-43
pubmed: 27089187
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008 Jul 24;8:32
pubmed: 18652655
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 May 01;24(3):596-606
pubmed: 28040687
Radiol Artif Intell. 2020 Oct 14;2(6):e190137
pubmed: 33937843
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Apr 14;3:57
pubmed: 32337372
JMIR Med Inform. 2019 Apr 27;7(2):e12239
pubmed: 31066697