Copper mobilisation from Cu sulphide minerals by methanobactin: Effect of pH, oxygen and natural organic matter.
Cu sulphide dissolution
aerobic methane oxidation
chalkophore
ligand-promoted dissolution
methanobactin
microbial Cu acquisition
Journal
Geobiology
ISSN: 1472-4669
Titre abrégé: Geobiology
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101185472
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2022
09 2022
Historique:
revised:
03
05
2022
received:
30
11
2021
accepted:
24
05
2022
pubmed:
19
6
2022
medline:
20
8
2022
entrez:
18
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Aerobic methane oxidation (MOx) depends critically on the availability of copper (Cu) as a crucial component of the metal centre of particulate methane monooxygenase, one of the main enzymes involved in MOx. Some methanotrophs have developed Cu acquisition strategies, in which they exude Cu-binding ligands termed chalkophores under conditions of low Cu availability. A well-characterised chalkophore is methanobactin (mb), exuded by the microaerophilic methanotroph Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b. Aerobic methanotrophs generally reside close to environmental oxic-anoxic interfaces, where the formation of Cu sulphide phases can aggravate the limitation of bioavailable Cu due to their low solubility. The reactivity of chalkophores towards such Cu sulphide mineral phases has not yet been investigated. In this study, a combination of dissolution experiments and equilibrium modelling was used to examine the dissolution and solubility of bulk and nanoparticulate Cu sulphide minerals in the presence of mb as influenced by pH, oxygen and natural organic matter. In general, we show that mb is effective at increasing the dissolved Cu concentrations in the presence of a variety of Cu sulphide phases that may potentially limit Cu bioavailability. More Cu was mobilised per mole of mb from Cu sulphide nanoparticles compared with well-crystalline bulk covellite (CuS). In general, the efficacy of mb at mobilising Cu from Cu sulphides is pH-dependent. At lower pH, e.g. pH 5, mb was ineffective at solubilizing Cu. The presence of mb increased dissolved Cu concentrations between pH 7 and 8.5, where the solubility of all Cu sulphides is generally low, both in the presence and absence of oxygen. These results suggest that chalkophore-promoted Cu mobilisation from sulphide phases is an effective extracellular mechanism for increasing dissolved Cu concentrations at oxic-anoxic interfaces, particularly in the neutral to slightly alkaline pH range. This suggests that aerobic methanotrophs may be able to fulfil their Cu requirements via the exudation of mb in natural environments where the bioavailability of Cu is constrained by very stable Cu sulphide phases.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35716154
doi: 10.1111/gbi.12505
pmc: PMC9544142
doi:
Substances chimiques
Imidazoles
0
Minerals
0
Oligopeptides
0
Sulfides
0
methanobactin
0
Copper
789U1901C5
Oxygen
S88TT14065
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
690-706Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Geobiology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993 Sep;59(9):2771-6
pubmed: 8215352
Inorg Chem. 2011 Feb 21;50(4):1378-91
pubmed: 21254756
Geochem Trans. 2011 Feb 07;12:2
pubmed: 21299876
Nature. 2000 Aug 24;406(6798):879-82
pubmed: 10972287
J Bacteriol. 1998 Jul;180(14):3606-13
pubmed: 9658004
Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Apr 1;43(7):2368-73
pubmed: 19452888
Biochemistry. 2005 Apr 5;44(13):5140-8
pubmed: 15794651
Microbiol Rev. 1996 Jun;60(2):439-71
pubmed: 8801441
Anal Chem. 2003 Feb 1;75(3):671-7
pubmed: 12585500
Trends Microbiol. 2000 May;8(5):221-5
pubmed: 10785638
ISME J. 2020 Nov;14(11):2659-2674
pubmed: 32665710
J Phys Chem A. 2012 Jun 28;116(25):6582-9
pubmed: 22656725
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2016 Mar 16;80(2):387-409
pubmed: 26984926
Geobiology. 2013 Jan;11(1):44-54
pubmed: 23082815
J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2017 Dec;28(12):2588-2601
pubmed: 28856622
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jul 17;104(29):12040-5
pubmed: 17615240
Geobiology. 2022 Sep;20(5):690-706
pubmed: 35716154
Anal Biochem. 1997 Nov 1;253(1):50-6
pubmed: 9356141
Res Microbiol. 2020 Apr - Jun;171(3-4):134-142
pubmed: 31991171
Environ Sci Technol. 2014 Nov 4;48(21):12662-70
pubmed: 25275965
J Inorg Biochem. 2006 Dec;100(12):2150-61
pubmed: 17070918
Plant Soil. 2014;383(1-2):59-71
pubmed: 25834291
Environ Sci Technol. 2003 Mar 1;37(5):958-71
pubmed: 12666927
Biochemistry. 2006 Feb 7;45(5):1442-53
pubmed: 16445286
Biochemistry. 2008 Jul 1;47(26):6793-801
pubmed: 18540635
J Inorg Biochem. 2012 Nov;116:55-62
pubmed: 23010330
Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Jul 5;50(13):6772-81
pubmed: 26704567
J Am Chem Soc. 2008 Sep 24;130(38):12604-5
pubmed: 18729522
Science. 2004 Sep 10;305(5690):1612-5
pubmed: 15361623
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016 Jan 15;82(6):1917-1923
pubmed: 26773085
Chem Senses. 2006 Sep;31(7):689-97
pubmed: 16840540
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 18;9(1):4817
pubmed: 30886176
J Gen Microbiol. 1970 May;61(2):205-18
pubmed: 5476891
FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2010 Jul;34(4):496-531
pubmed: 20236329