Stability of transverse dental arch dimension with passive self-ligating brackets: a 6-year follow-up study.
Journal
Progress in orthodontics
ISSN: 2196-1042
Titre abrégé: Prog Orthod
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 100936353
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 Jun 2022
20 Jun 2022
Historique:
received:
18
03
2022
accepted:
25
04
2022
entrez:
19
6
2022
pubmed:
20
6
2022
medline:
22
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The stability of the transverse expansion in passive self-ligating bracket treatments is a debated topic in orthodontics. However, to date, only 3 reports are available in the literature, with the maximum follow-up of 3 years after the end of therapy. The present study aims to evaluate the stability of orthodontic treatment with self-ligating brackets in a 6-year follow-up period of time. A sample of 56 non-extractive cases (of whom 33 females, mean age 16.9, SD = 9.0 years) consecutively treated with Damon® system was retrospectively selected. All patients received fixed retainers from canine to canine in both arches at the end of treatment, and no removable retainers were provided. The mean values of the transverse intercusp, transverse centroid and transverse lingual distances were evaluated for all teeth from canines to second molars in both arches. Each measure was calculated at four timepoints: before treatment (T0), at the end of treatment (T1), one year after treatment (T2) and six years after treatment (T3). Transverse diameters were measured for all teeth, starting from the canines to the second molars, for a total of 1680 observations, and subsequently compared in order to evaluate intra-treatment and post-treatment modifications. There were increases in all transverse dental measurements during active treatment. A statistically significant (p < .05) reduction of the transverse diameter was found, for upper and lower premolars, from T1 to T3. The 6-year follow-up analysis detected that the initial transverse expansion showed a statistically significant relapse in premolars. No relapse was detected at the level of canines, due to the presence of fixed retainers, and minimal at first molars.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35718801
doi: 10.1186/s40510-022-00414-7
pii: 10.1186/s40510-022-00414-7
pmc: PMC9207026
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
19Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
De Felice ME, Nucci L, Fiori A, Flores-Mir C, Perillo L, Grassia V. Accuracy of interproximal enamel reduction during clear aligner treatment. Prog Orthod. 2020;21:28.
doi: 10.1186/s40510-020-00329-1
Basciftci FA, Akin M, Ileri Z, Bayram S. Long-term stability of dentoalveolar, skeletal, and soft tissue changes after non-extraction treatment with a self-ligating system. Korean J Orthod. 2014;44(3):119–27.
doi: 10.4041/kjod.2014.44.3.119
Raucci G, Pacheco-Pereira C, Elyasi M, D’Apuzzo F, Flores-Mir C, Perillo L. Short- and long-term evaluation of mandibular dental arch dimensional changes in patients treated with a lip bumper during mixed dentition followed by fixed appliances. Angle Orthod. 2016;86(5):753–60.
doi: 10.2319/073015-519.1
Damon DH. The rationale, evolution and clinical application of the self-ligating bracket. Clin Orthod Res. 1998;1:52–61.
doi: 10.1111/ocr.1998.1.1.52
Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Makou M, Eliades T. Mandibular dental arch changes associated with treatment of crowding using self-ligating and conventional brackets. Eur J Orthod. 2010;32:248–53.
doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp123
Harradine NW. Self-ligating brackets: where are we now? J Orthod. 2003;30:262–73.
doi: 10.1093/ortho/30.3.262
Yang X, Xue C, He Y, Zhao M, Luo M, Wang P, Bai D. Transversal changes, space closure, and efficiency of conventional and self-ligating appliances. J Orofac Orthop. 2018;79(1):1–10.
doi: 10.1007/s00056-017-0110-4
Chen SS, Greenlee GM, Kim JE, Smith CL, Huang GJ. Systematic review of self- ligating brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137(6):726.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.01.012
Moyano J, Montagut D, Perera R, Fernández-Bozal J, Puigdollers A. Comparison of changes in the dental transverse and sagittal planes between patients treated with self-ligating and with conventional brackets. Dental Press J Orthod. 2020;25(1):47–55.
doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.25.1.047-055.oar
Lineberger MB, Franchi L, Cevidanes L, Huanca Ghislanzoni LT, McNamara JA Jr. Three dimensional digital cast analysis of the effects produced by a passive self-ligating system. Eur J Orthod. 2016;38(6):609–14.
doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjv089
Cattaneo PM, Treccani M, Carlsson K, Thorgeirsson T, Myrda A, Cevidanes LH, Melsen B. Transversal maxillary dento-alveolar changes in patients treated with active and passive self-ligating brackets: a randomized clinical trial using CBCT-scans and digital models. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2011;14(4):222–33.
doi: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2011.01527.x
Lucchese A, Manuelli M, Albertini P, Ghislanzoni LH. Transverse and torque dental changes after passive self-ligating fixed therapy: A two-year follow-up study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019;156(1):94–103.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.08.019
Atik E, Taner T. Stability comparison of two different dentoalveolar expansion treatment protocols. Dental Press J Orthod. 2017;22:75–82.
doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.22.5.075-082.oar
Grassia V, D’apuzzo F, DiStasio D, Jamilian A, Lucchese A, Perillo L. Upper and lower arch changes after mixed palatal expansion protocol. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2014;15(4):375–80.
pubmed: 25517583
Dekel E, Nucci L, Weill T, Flores-Mir C, Becker A, Perillo L, Chaushu S. Impaction of maxillary canines and its effect on the position of adjacent teeth and canine development: A cone-beam computed tomography study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021;159(2):e135–47.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.10.015
Tecco S, Tetè S, Perillo L, Chimenti C, Festa F. Maxillary arch width changes during orthodontic treatment with fixed self-ligating and traditional straight-wire appliances. World J Orthod. 2009;10:290–4.
pubmed: 20072744
Pandis N, Gonzales-Marin C, Fleming PS. Effects of fixed vs removable orthodontic retainers on stability and periodontal health: 4-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018;154(2):167-174.e1.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.01.007
Al-Moghrabi D, Pandis N, Fleming PS. The effects of fixed and removable orthodontic retainers: a systematic review. Prog Orthod. 2016;17:24.
doi: 10.1186/s40510-016-0137-x
Yu Z, Jiaqiang L, Weiting C, et al. Stability of treatment with self-ligating brackets and conventional brackets in adolescents: a long-term follow-up retrospective study. Head Face Med. 2014;10:41.
doi: 10.1186/1746-160X-10-41