Efficacy of Tranexamic Acid in Blood Versus Crystalloid-Resuscitated Trauma/Hemorrhagic Shock.

Whole blood (WB) or blood products are not always immediately available for repletion of lost intravascular volume in trauma/hemorrhagic shock (T/HS), and thus, resuscitation with crystalloid solutions is often necessary. Recently, we have shown enteral tranexamic acid (TXA) to be effective as a mild protease inhibitor in blood-resuscitated T/HS by counteracting proteolytic activity in and leaking from the gut with resultant preservation of systemic vascular integrity. We hypothesized that enteral TXA would improve hemodynamic stability after T/HS in the absence of blood reperfusion. We directly compared resuscitation with enteral TXA versus intravenous (IV) TXA in conjunction with lactated Ringer's solution (LR) or WB reperfusion in an experimental T/HS model. Rats were subjected to laparotomy and exsanguinated to a mean arterial blood pressure of 35-40 mm Hg for 90 min, followed by LR or WB reperfusion and monitored for 120 min. TXA was administered via IV (10 mg/kg) or enteral infusion (150 mM) 20 min after establishment of hemorrhage for 150 min. Animals resuscitated with LR were unable to restore or maintain a survivable mean arterial blood pressure (>65 mm Hg), regardless of TXA treatment route. In contrast, rats reperfused with WB and given TXA either enterally or IV displayed hemodynamic improvements superior to WB controls. Results suggest that the beneficial hemodynamic responses to enteral or IV TXA after experimental T/HS depend upon reperfusion of WB or components present in WB as TXA, regardless of delivery mode, does not have appreciable hemodynamic effects when paired with LR reperfusion.

Informations de copyright

Published by Elsevier Inc.