p53 immunohistochemistry in endometrial cancer: clinical and molecular correlates in the PORTEC-3 trial.
Journal
Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc
ISSN: 1530-0285
Titre abrégé: Mod Pathol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8806605
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2022
10 2022
Historique:
received:
17
01
2022
accepted:
06
05
2022
revised:
06
05
2022
pubmed:
26
6
2022
medline:
30
9
2022
entrez:
25
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Standard molecular classification of endometrial cancers (EC) is now endorsed by the WHO and identifies p53-abnormal (p53abn) EC as the subgroup with the poorest prognosis and the most likely to benefit from adjuvant chemo(radio)therapy. P53abn EC are POLE wildtype, mismatch repair proficient and show abnormal immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for p53. Correct interpretation of routinely performed p53 IHC has therefore become of paramount importance. We aimed to comprehensively investigate abnormal p53 IHC patterns and their relation to clinicopathological and molecular features. Tumor material of 411 molecularly classified high-risk EC from consenting patients from the PORTEC-3 clinical trial were collected. p53 IHC was successful in 408 EC and was considered abnormal when the tumor showed a mutant expression pattern (including subclonal): overexpression, null or cytoplasmic. The presence of pathogenic mutations was determined by next generation sequencing (NGS). Abnormal p53 expression was observed in 131/408 (32%) tumors. The most common abnormal p53 IHC pattern was overexpression (n = 89, 68%), followed by null (n = 12, 9%) and cytoplasmic (n = 3, 2%). Subclonal abnormal p53 staining was observed in 27 cases (21%), which was frequently but not exclusively, associated with POLE mutations and/or MMRd (n = 22/27; p < 0.001). Agreement between p53 IHC and TP53 NGS was observed in 90.7%, resulting in a sensitivity and specificity of 83.6% and 94.3%, respectively. Excluding POLEmut and MMRd EC, as per the WHO-endorsed algorithm, increased the accuracy to 94.5% with sensitivity and specificity of 95.0% and 94.1%, respectively. Our data shows that awareness of the abnormal p53 IHC patterns are prerequisites for correct EC molecular classification. Subclonal abnormal p53 expression is a strong indicator for POLEmut and/or MMRd EC. No significant differences in clinical outcomes were observed among the abnormal p53 IHC patterns. Our data support use of the WHO-endorsed algorithm and combining the different abnormal p53 IHC patterns into one diagnostic entity (p53abn EC).
Identifiants
pubmed: 35752743
doi: 10.1038/s41379-022-01102-x
pii: S0893-3952(22)00263-0
pmc: PMC7613653
mid: EMS144857
doi:
Substances chimiques
Tumor Suppressor Protein p53
0
Types de publication
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1475-1483Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : IS-BRC-1215-20007
Pays : United Kingdom
Investigateurs
N Horeweg
(N)
S M de Boer
(SM)
C L Creutzberg
(CL)
T Bosse
(T)
V T H B M Smit
(VTHBM)
J Kroep
(J)
R A Nout
(RA)
H W Nijman
(HW)
M de Bruyn
(M)
M E Powell
(ME)
N Singh
(N)
H C Kitchener
(HC)
E Crosbie
(E)
R Edmondson
(R)
D N Church
(DN)
A Leary
(A)
L Mileshkin
(L)
P M Pollock
(PM)
H MacKay
(H)
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Dec 25;13(1):
pubmed: 33375706
Histopathology. 2020 Jan;76(1):52-63
pubmed: 31846532
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Sep;20(9):1273-1285
pubmed: 31345626
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Dec 15;25(24):7517-7526
pubmed: 31492746
J Pathol. 2020 Mar;250(3):312-322
pubmed: 31829447
Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Jun 1;17(11):3733-41
pubmed: 21467160
J Pathol Clin Res. 2016 Jul 13;2(4):247-258
pubmed: 27840695
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Aug 15;23(16):4693-4703
pubmed: 28446506
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jul 10;36(20):2044-2051
pubmed: 29584549
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021 Jan;31(1):12-39
pubmed: 33397713
Clin Cancer Res. 2000 Feb;6(2):443-51
pubmed: 10690522
Breast Cancer Res. 2012 May 02;14(3):R70
pubmed: 22551440
Br J Cancer. 2015 Jul 14;113(2):299-310
pubmed: 26172027
J Pathol. 2020 Mar;250(3):336-345
pubmed: 31829441
Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2021 Jan;40(1):32-40
pubmed: 33290354
Ann Oncol. 2018 May 1;29(5):1180-1188
pubmed: 29432521
Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Jul 1;20(13):3569-80
pubmed: 24803582
Hum Mutat. 2016 Sep;37(9):865-76
pubmed: 27328919
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Aug 15;22(16):4215-24
pubmed: 27006490
Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2019 Jan;38 Suppl 1:S123-S131
pubmed: 29517499
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Oct 10;38(29):3388-3397
pubmed: 32749941
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 18;11(7):e0159636
pubmed: 27428001
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e55103
pubmed: 23359294
Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jan;42(Database issue):D980-5
pubmed: 24234437
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2020 Aug;152:102973
pubmed: 32497971
Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Aug 1;26(15):3928-3935
pubmed: 32601075