Randomized phase II trial of FOLFIRI-panitumumab compared with FOLFIRI alone in patients with RAS wild-type circulating tumor DNA metastatic colorectal cancer beyond progression to first-line FOLFOX-panitumumab: the BEYOND study (GEMCAD 17-01).
Antibodies, Monoclonal
/ therapeutic use
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ therapeutic use
Camptothecin
/ therapeutic use
Circulating Tumor DNA
/ genetics
Colonic Neoplasms
/ etiology
Colorectal Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Disease Progression
Fluorouracil
/ therapeutic use
Humans
Leucovorin
/ therapeutic use
Panitumumab
/ therapeutic use
Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf
/ genetics
Rectal Neoplasms
Colorectal cancer
Liquid biopsy
Metastatic disease
Panitumumab
Second line therapy
Journal
Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico
ISSN: 1699-3055
Titre abrégé: Clin Transl Oncol
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101247119
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2022
Nov 2022
Historique:
received:
11
04
2022
accepted:
27
05
2022
pubmed:
28
6
2022
medline:
4
10
2022
entrez:
27
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Panitumumab plus FOLFOX (P-FOLFOX) is standard first-line treatment for RAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer. The value of panitumumab rechallenge is currently unknown. We assessed addition of panitumumab to FOLFIRI (P-FOLFIRI) beyond progression to P-FOLFOX in patients with no RAS mutations in liquid biopsy (LB). In this randomized phase II trial, patients were assigned (3:2 ratio) to second-line P-FOLFIRI (arm A) or FOLFIRI alone (arm B). LB for circulating tumor DNA analysis was collected at study entry and at disease progression. Primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival. Two-stage Simon design required 85 patients to be included (EudraCT 2017-004519-38). Between February 2019 and November 2020, 49 patients were screened (16 RAS mutations in LB detected) and 31 included (18 assigned to arm A and 13 to arm B). The study was prematurely closed due to inadequate recruitment. Serious adverse events were more frequent in arm A (44% vs. 23%). Overall response rate was 33% (arm A) vs. 7.7% (arm B). Six-month progression-free survival rate was 66.7% (arm A) and 38.5% (arm B). Median progression-free survival was 11.0 months (arm A) and 4.0 months (arm B) (hazard ratio, 0.58). At disease progression, RAS or BRAF mutations in LB were found in 4/11 patients (36%) in arm A and 2/10 (20%) in arm B. The BEYOND study suggests a meaningful benefit of P-FOLFIRI beyond progression to P-FOLFOX in metastatic colorectal cancer patients with WT RAS status selected by LB. This strategy deserves further investigation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35761123
doi: 10.1007/s12094-022-02868-x
pii: 10.1007/s12094-022-02868-x
pmc: PMC9522782
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Monoclonal
0
Circulating Tumor DNA
0
Panitumumab
6A901E312A
Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf
EC 2.7.11.1
Leucovorin
Q573I9DVLP
Fluorouracil
U3P01618RT
Camptothecin
XT3Z54Z28A
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2155-2165Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Ann Oncol. 2017 Jun 01;28(6):1294-1301
pubmed: 28368441
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Nov 15;24(22):5602-5609
pubmed: 29898991
BMC Cancer. 2015 Oct 16;15:713
pubmed: 26474549
Ann Oncol. 2014 Jan;25(1):107-16
pubmed: 24356622
Cancer Cell. 2019 Jul 8;36(1):35-50.e9
pubmed: 31287991
Oncotarget. 2016 Mar 8;7(10):11380-96
pubmed: 26863631
Ann Oncol. 2018 Jan 1;29(1):112-118
pubmed: 28950295
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Aug 15;23(16):4602-4616
pubmed: 28424201
Oncotarget. 2017 May 23;8(21):35289-35300
pubmed: 27852040
Ann Oncol. 2015 Apr;26(4):731-736
pubmed: 25628445
Nature. 2012 Jun 28;486(7404):537-40
pubmed: 22722843
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 May 15;23(10):2414-2422
pubmed: 27780856
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Mar 1;5(3):343-350
pubmed: 30476968
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Apr 1;26(10):1626-34
pubmed: 18316791
Cancer Discov. 2018 Oct;8(10):1270-1285
pubmed: 30166348
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jan 15;22(2):229-37
pubmed: 14657227
Ann Oncol. 2016 Jun;27(6):1055-1061
pubmed: 27002107
Ann Oncol. 2017 Dec 01;28(12):3009-3014
pubmed: 29045518
Nat Med. 2015 Jul;21(7):795-801
pubmed: 26030179
JCO Precis Oncol. 2019 Dec;3:1-16
pubmed: 35100697
Lancet Oncol. 2015 May;16(5):499-508
pubmed: 25877855
Ann Oncol. 2016 Aug;27(8):1539-46
pubmed: 27177863
Ann Oncol. 2018 Jan 1;29(1):119-126
pubmed: 28945848
J Cancer. 2021 Jun 26;12(17):5268-5274
pubmed: 34335943
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Aug 1;23(22):4866-75
pubmed: 15939922
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Oct 1;30(28):3499-506
pubmed: 22949147
Mol Oncol. 2017 Feb;11(2):208-219
pubmed: 28106345
Eur J Cancer. 1999 Sep;35(9):1343-7
pubmed: 10658525
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Jan;14(1):29-37
pubmed: 23168366
Ann Oncol. 2017 Jun 01;28(6):1325-1332
pubmed: 28419195
Ann Oncol. 2012 Sep;23(9):2313-2318
pubmed: 22396447
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Nov 1;28(31):4697-705
pubmed: 20921465
ESMO Open. 2018 May 5;3(4):e000353
pubmed: 29765773