Association of Initial Pulseless Electrical Activity Heart Rate and Clinical Outcomes following Adult Non-Traumatic Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.


Journal

Prehospital emergency care
ISSN: 1545-0066
Titre abrégé: Prehosp Emerg Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9703530

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
medline: 2 8 2023
pubmed: 1 7 2022
entrez: 30 6 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Studies evaluating the prognostic value of the pulseless electrical activity (PEA) heart rate in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients have reported conflicting results. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between the initial PEA heart rate and favorable clinical outcomes for OHCA patients. The present post-hoc cohort study used the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Cardiac Epidemiologic Registry Version 3, which included OHCA patients in seven US and three Canadian sites from April 2011 to June 2015. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge and the secondary outcome was survival with a good functional outcome. For the primary analysis, the patients were separated into eight groups according to their first rhythms and PEA heart rates: (1) initial PEA heart rate of 1-20 beats per minute (bpm); (2) 21-40 bpm; (3) 41-60 bpm; (4) 61-80 bpm; (5) 81-100 bpm; (6) 101-120 bpm; (7) over 120 bpm; (8) initial shockable rhythm (reference category). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the associations of interest. We identified 17,675 patients (PEA: 7,089 [40.1%]; initial shockable rhythm: 10,797 [59.9%]). Patients with initial PEA electrical frequencies ≤100 bpm were less likely to survive to hospital discharge than patients with initial shockable rhythms (1-20 bpm: adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.15 [95%CI 0.11-0.21]; 21-40 bpm: AOR = 0.21 [0.18-0.25]; 41-60 bpm: AOR = 0.30 [0.25-0.36]; 61-80 bpm: AOR = 0.37 [0.28-0.49]; 81-100 bpm: AOR = 0.55 [0.41-0.65]). However, there were no statistical outcome differences between PEA patients with initial electrical frequencies of >100 bpm and patients with initial shockable rhythms (101-120 bpm: AOR = 0.65 [95%CI 0.42-1.01]; >120 bpm: AOR = 0.72 [95%CI 0.37-1.39]). Similar results were observed for survival with good functional outcomes (101-120 bpm: AOR = 0.60 [95%CI 0.31-1.15]; >120 bpm: AOR = 1.08 [95%CI 0.50-2.28]). We observed a good association between higher initial PEA electrical frequency and favorable clinical outcomes for OHCA patients. As there is no significant difference in outcomes between patients with initial PEA heart rates of more than 100 bpm and those with initial shockable rhythms, we can hypothesize that these patients could be considered in the same prognostic category.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35771725
doi: 10.1080/10903127.2022.2096160
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

728-735

Auteurs

Alexis Cournoyer (A)

Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, CIUSSS-NIM, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, CIUSSS-NIM, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Corporation d'Urgences-santé, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Yiorgos Alexandros Cavayas (YA)

Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Department of Medicine, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, CIUSSS-NIM, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Department of Surgery, Institut de Cardiologie de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Martin Albert (M)

Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Department of Medicine, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, CIUSSS-NIM, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Department of Surgery, Institut de Cardiologie de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Eli Segal (E)

Department of Emergency Medicine, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, CIUSSS-NIM, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Corporation d'Urgences-santé, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Université McGill, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Hôpital général juif, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Yoan Lamarche (Y)

Department of Medicine, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, CIUSSS-NIM, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Department of Surgery, Institut de Cardiologie de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Brian J Potter (BJ)

Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Luc de Montigny (L)

Corporation d'Urgences-santé, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Jean-Marc Chauny (JM)

Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, CIUSSS-NIM, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Jean Paquet (J)

Department of Emergency Medicine, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, CIUSSS-NIM, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Martin Marquis (M)

Department of Emergency Medicine, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, CIUSSS-NIM, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Sylvie Cossette (S)

Centre de Recherche de l'Institut de Cardiologie de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Véronique Castonguay (V)

Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, CIUSSS-NIM, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Judy Morris (J)

Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, CIUSSS-NIM, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Justine Lessard (J)

Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, CIUSSS-NIM, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Raoul Daoust (R)

Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, CIUSSS-NIM, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH