Fully automated determination of the cervical vertebrae maturation stages using deep learning with directional filters.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
09
10
2021
accepted:
17
05
2022
entrez:
1
7
2022
pubmed:
2
7
2022
medline:
8
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
We aim to apply deep learning to achieve fully automated detection and classification of the Cervical Vertebrae Maturation (CVM) stages. We propose an innovative custom-designed deep Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) with a built-in set of novel directional filters that highlight the edges of the Cervical Vertebrae in X-ray images. A total of 1018 Cephalometric radiographs were labeled and classified according to the Cervical Vertebrae Maturation (CVM) stages. The images were cropped to extract the cervical vertebrae using an Aggregate Channel Features (ACF) object detector. The resulting images were used to train four different Deep Learning (DL) models: our proposed CNN, MobileNetV2, ResNet101, and Xception, together with a set of tunable directional edge enhancers. When using MobileNetV2, ResNet101 and Xception, data augmentation is adopted to allow adequate network complexity while avoiding overfitting. The performance of our CNN model was compared with that of MobileNetV2, ResNet101 and Xception with and without the use of directional filters. For validation and performance assessment, k-fold cross-validation, ROC curves, and p-values were used. The proposed innovative model that uses a CNN preceded with a layer of tunable directional filters achieved a validation accuracy of 84.63%84.63% in CVM stage classification into five classes, exceeding the accuracy achieved with the other DL models investigated. MobileNetV2, ResNet101 and Xception used with directional filters attained accuracies of 78.54%, 74.10%, and 80.86%, respectively. The custom-designed CNN method also achieves 75.11% in six-class CVM stage classification. The effectiveness of the directional filters is reflected in the improved performance attained in the results. If the custom-designed CNN is used without the directional filters, the test accuracy decreases to 80.75%. In the Xception model without the directional filters, the testing accuracy drops slightly to 79.42% in the five-class CVM stage classification. The proposed model of a custom-designed CNN together with the tunable Directional Filters (CNNDF) is observed to provide higher accuracy than the commonly used pre-trained network models that we investigated in the fully automated determination of the CVM stages.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35776715
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269198
pii: PONE-D-21-32498
pmc: PMC9249196
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0269198Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Jun;143(6):845-54
pubmed: 23726335
Nature. 2015 May 28;521(7553):436-44
pubmed: 26017442
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2020 Jul;49(5):20190441
pubmed: 32105499
Angle Orthod. 1982 Apr;52(2):88-112
pubmed: 6980608
Prog Orthod. 2019 Nov 15;20(1):41
pubmed: 31728776
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2014 Aug;36(8):1532-45
pubmed: 26353336
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Mar;133(3):395-400; quiz 476.e1-2
pubmed: 18331939
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004 Nov;126(5):555-68
pubmed: 15520688
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Jul;150(1):98-104
pubmed: 27364211
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020 Feb;157(2):228-239
pubmed: 32005475
Angle Orthod. 2018 Mar;88(2):133-143
pubmed: 29337631
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 28;10(10):e0141198
pubmed: 26510187
J Digit Imaging. 2017 Aug;30(4):427-441
pubmed: 28275919
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Jan;143(1):50-60
pubmed: 23273360
Am J Orthod. 1982 Oct;82(4):299-309
pubmed: 6961802
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Nov;130(5):622-8
pubmed: 17110259
Korean J Radiol. 2017 Jul-Aug;18(4):570-584
pubmed: 28670152
Skeletal Radiol. 2019 Feb;48(2):275-283
pubmed: 30069585
Angle Orthod. 2012 Jul;82(4):658-62
pubmed: 22059467
Angle Orthod. 1967 Apr;37(2):134-43
pubmed: 4290545
Angle Orthod. 2002 Aug;72(4):316-23
pubmed: 12169031
Angle Orthod. 2014 Nov;84(6):951-6
pubmed: 24665865
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Sep;2(9):e486-e488
pubmed: 33328116
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019 Nov;156(5):626-632
pubmed: 31677671
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Aug;140(2):182-8
pubmed: 21803255
Am J Orthod. 1976 Jun;69(6):611-9
pubmed: 179326
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 Dec;148(6):1010-6
pubmed: 26672707
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Jan;107(1):58-66
pubmed: 7817962
Angle Orthod. 2019 Nov;89(6):903-909
pubmed: 31282738