The Comparative Effectiveness of Vasoactive Treatments for Hepatorenal Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.


Journal

Critical care medicine
ISSN: 1530-0293
Titre abrégé: Crit Care Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0355501

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 10 2022
Historique:
pubmed: 2 7 2022
medline: 20 9 2022
entrez: 1 7 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Evidence examining commonly used drug treatments remains uncertain. We assessed the comparative effectiveness of inpatient treatments for HRS by performing a network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs). We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception. Pairs of reviewers independently identified eligible RCTs that enrolled patients with type 1 or 2 HRS. Pairs of reviewers independently extracted data. We assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane tool for RCTs and certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations approach. Our main outcomes are all-cause mortality, HRS reversal, and serious adverse events. Of 3,079 citations, we included 26 RCTs examining 1,736 patients. Based on pooled analysis, terlipressin increases HRS reversal compared with placebo (142 reversals per 1,000 [95% CI, >87.7 to >210.9]; high certainty). Norepinephrine (112.7 reversals per 1,000 [95% CI, 52.6 to >192.3]) may increase HRS reversal compared with placebo (low certainty). The effect of midodrine+octreotide (67.8 reversals per 1,000 [95% CI, <2.8 to >177.4]; very low) on HRS reversal is uncertain. Terlipressin may reduce mortality compared with placebo (93.7 fewer deaths [95% CI, 168.7 to <12.5]; low certainty). Terlipressin probably increases the risk of serious adverse events compared with placebo (20.4 more events per 1,000 [95% CI, <5.1 to >51]; moderate certainty). Terlipressin increases HRS reversal compared with placebo. Terlipressin may reduce mortality. Until access to terlipressin improves, initial norepinephrine administration may be more appropriate than initial trial with midodrine+octreotide. Our review has the potential to inform future guideline and practice in the treatment of HRS.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35777925
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005595
pii: 00003246-202210000-00001
doi:

Substances chimiques

Vasoconstrictor Agents 0
Midodrine 6YE7PBM15H
Terlipressin 7Z5X49W53P
Octreotide RWM8CCW8GP
Norepinephrine X4W3ENH1CV

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1419-1429

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Dr. Rewa discloses payments or Honoria from Baxter Healthcare and participates on a data safety monitor board for Leadiant Biosciences, and received payments. Dr. Bagshaw discloses payments or Honoria from Baxter Health and participates on a data safety monitoring board for I-SPY COVID, and received payments. Dr. Rewa received funding from Leading Biosciences. Dr. Bagshaw received funding from BioPorto. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.

Références

Francoz C, Durand F, Kahn JA, et al.: Hepatorenal syndrome. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2019; 14:774–781
Angeli P, Ginès P, Wong F, et al.: Diagnosis and management of acute kidney injury in patients with cirrhosis: Revised consensus recommendations of the International Club of Ascites. J Hepatol 2015; 62:968–974
Arora V, Maiwall R, Rajan V, et al.: Terlipressin is superior to noradrenaline in the management of acute kidney injury in acute on chronic liver failure. Hepatology 2020; 71:600–610
Facciorusso A, Chandar AK, Murad MH, et al.: Comparative efficacy of pharmacological strategies for management of type 1 hepatorenal syndrome: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 2:94–102
Wang H, Liu A, Bo W, et al.: Terlipressin in the treatment of hepatorenal syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97:e0431
Allegretti AS, Israelsen M, Krag A, et al.: Terlipressin versus placebo or no intervention for people with cirrhosis and hepatorenal syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 6:CD005162
Best LM, Freeman SC, Sutton AJ, et al.: Treatment for hepatorenal syndrome in people with decompensated liver cirrhosis: A network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 9:CD013103
Siemieniuk RA, Bartoszko JJ, Ge L, et al.: Drug treatments for covid-19: Living systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ 2020; 370:m2980
Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, et al.: RoB 2: A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2019; 366:l4898
Pitre T, Mah J, Helmeczi W, et al.: Medical treatments for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Thorax 2022 Feb 10. [online ahead of print]
Brignardello-Petersen R, Bonner A, Alexander PE, et al.; GRADE Working Group: Advances in the GRADE approach to rate the certainty in estimates from a network meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 2018; 93:36–44
Zheng L, Brignardello-Petersen R, Hultcrantz M, et al.: GRADE guidelines 32: GRADE offers guidance on choosing targets of GRADE certainty of evidence ratings. J Clin Epidemiol 2021; 137:163-175
Brignardello-Petersen R, Florez ID, Izcovich A, et al.; GRADE working group: GRADE approach to drawing conclusions from a network meta-analysis using a minimally contextualised framework. BMJ 2020; 371:m3900
Wasserstein RL, Lazar NA: The ASA statement on p-values: Context, process, and purpose. Am Stat 2016; 70:129–133
Santesso N, Glenton C, Dahm P, et al.; GRADE Working Group: GRADE guidelines 26: Informative statements to communicate the findings of systematic reviews of interventions. J Clin Epidemiol 2020; 119:126–135
Chaimani A, Higgins JP, Mavridis D, et al.: Graphical tools for network meta-analysis in STATA. PLoS One 2013; 8:e76654
Gerta Rücker UK, Koenig J, Efthumiou O, et al.: netmeta Package. 2021. Available at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/netmeta/netmeta.pdf . Accessed October 1, 2021
Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al. (Eds): Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.3 (updated February 2022). Cochrane, 2022. Available at: www.training.cochrane.org/handbook
Rouse B, Chaimani A, Li T: Network meta-analysis: An introduction for clinicians. Intern Emerg Med 2017; 12:103–111
Schandelmaier S, Briel M, Varadhan R, et al.: Development of the Instrument to assess the Credibility of Effect Modification Analyses (ICEMAN) in randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses. CMAJ 2020; 192:E901–E906
Ghosh S, Choudhary NS, Sharma AK, et al.: Noradrenaline vs terlipressin in the treatment of type 2 hepatorenal syndrome: A randomized pilot study. Liver Int 2013; 33:1187–1193
El-Desoki Mahmoud EI, Abdelaziz DH, Abd-Elsalam S, et al.: Norepinephrine is more effective than midodrine/octreotide in patients with hepatorenal syndrome-acute kidney injury: A randomized controlled trial. Front Pharmacol 2021; 12:675948
Nowsherwan Khan AA, Ali A, Muhammad Khan A, et al.: Effectiveness of terlipressin and albumin for the treatment of hepatorenal syndrome. Pak J Med Health Sci 2021; 15:809–813
Solanki P, Chawla A, Garg R, et al.: Beneficial effects of terlipressin in hepatorenal syndrome: A prospective, randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2003; 18:152–156
Goyal O, Sidhu SS, Sehgal N, et al.: Noradrenaline is as effective as terlipressin in hepatorenal syndrome type 1: A prospective, randomized trial. J Assoc Physicians India 2016; 64:30–35
Saif RU, Dar HA, Sofi SM, et al.: Noradrenaline versus terlipressin in the management of type 1 hepatorenal syndrome: A randomized controlled study. Indian J Gastroenterol 2018; 37:424–429
Sharma P, Kumar A, Shrama BC, et al.: An open label, pilot, randomized controlled trial of noradrenaline versus terlipressin in the treatment of type 1 hepatorenal syndrome and predictors of response. Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103:1689–1697
Singh V, Ghosh S, Singh B, et al.: Noradrenaline vs. terlipressin in the treatment of hepatorenal syndrome: A randomized study. J Hepatol 2012; 56:1293–1298
Srivastava S, Shalimar, Vishnubhatla S, et al.: Randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of terlipressin and albumin with a combination of concurrent dopamine, furosemide, and albumin in hepatorenal syndrome. J Clin Exp Hepatol 2015; 5:276–285
Indrabi RA, Javid G, Zargar SA, et al.: Noradrenaline is equally effective as terlipressin in reversal of type 1 hepatorenal syndrome: A randomized prospective study. J Clin Exper Hepatol 2013; 3:S97
Tavakkoli H, Yazdanpanah K, Mansourian M: Noradrenalin versus the combination of midodrine and octreotide in patients with hepatorenal syndrome: Randomized clinical trial. Int J Prev Med 2012; 3:764–769
Shamail Z, Israr H, Ghis T, et al.: Role of terlipressin and albumin combination versus albumin alone in hepatorenal syndrome. Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107:S175–S176
Goyal O, Sehgal N, Puri S, et al.: Terlipressin versus noradrenalin in hepatorenal syndrome: A prospective, randomised, unblinded study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 23:30–35
Badawy SS, Meckawy NM, Ahmed A: Norepinephrine versus terlipressin in patients with type 1 hepatorenal syndrome refractory to treatment with octreotide, midodrine, and albumin (a prospective randomized comparative study). Egypt J Cardiothoracic Anesth 2013; 7:13
Silawat FN, Shaikh MK, Lohana RK, et al.: Efficacy of terlipressin and albumin in the treatment of hepatorenal syndrome. World Appl Sci J 2011; 12:1946–1950
Pomier-Layrargues G, Paquin SC, Hassoun Z, et al.: Octreotide in hepatorenal syndrome: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Hepatology 2003; 38:238–243
Neri S, Pulvirenti D, Malaguarnera M, et al.: Terlipressin and albumin in patients with cirrhosis and type I hepatorenal syndrome. Dig Dis Sci 2008; 53:830–835
Cavallin M, Kamath PS, Merli M, et al.; Italian Association for the Study of the Liver Study Group on Hepatorenal Syndrome: Terlipressin plus albumin versus midodrine and octreotide plus albumin in the treatment of hepatorenal syndrome: A randomized trial. Hepatology 2015; 62:567–574
Alessandria C, Ottobrelli A, Debernardi-Venon W, et al.: Noradrenalin vs terlipressin in patients with hepatorenal syndrome: A prospective, randomized, unblinded, pilot study. J Hepatol 2007; 47:499–505
Zafar S, Haque I, Tayyab GU, et al.: Role of terlipressin and albumin combination versus albumin alone in hepatorenal syndrome: 418. Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107:S175–S176
Martín-Llahí M, Pépin MN, Guevara M, et al.; TAHRS Investigators: Terlipressin and albumin vs albumin in patients with cirrhosis and hepatorenal syndrome: A randomized study. Gastroenterology 2008; 134:1352–1359
Boyer TD, Sanyal AJ, Wong F, et al.; REVERSE Study Investigators: Terlipressin plus albumin is more effective than albumin alone in improving renal function in patients with cirrhosis and hepatorenal syndrome type 1. Gastroenterology 2016; 150:1579–1589.e2
Wong F, Pappas SC, Curry MP, et al.; CONFIRM Study Investigators: Terlipressin plus albumin for the treatment of type 1 hepatorenal syndrome. N Engl J Med 2021; 384:818–828
Sanyal AJ, Boyer T, Garcia-Tsao G, et al.; Terlipressin Study Group: A randomized, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of terlipressin for type 1 hepatorenal syndrome. Gastroenterology 2008; 134:1360–1368
Yang Y, Dan Z, Liu N, et al.: Efficacy of terlipressin in treatment of liver cirrhosis with hepatorenal syndrome. J Inter Intensive Med 2001; 7:123–125
Copaci I. Micu L, Chiriac G: Reversal of type 1 hepatorenal syndrome with terlipressin and octreotide. Hepatol 2016; 64 (Suppl 2):S660
Biggins SW, Angeli P, Garcia-Tsao G, et al.: Diagnosis, evaluation, and management of ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and hepatorenal syndrome: 2021 practice guidance by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology 2021; 74:1014–1048
Pericleous M, Sarnowski A, Moore A, et al.: The clinical management of abdominal ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and hepatorenal syndrome: A review of current guidelines and recommendations. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 28:e10–e18
Kiser TH, Fish DN, Obritsch MD, et al.: Vasopressin, not octreotide, may be beneficial in the treatment of hepatorenal syndrome: A retrospective study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2005; 20:1813–1820
Mattos ÂZ, Mattos AA, Ribeiro RA: Terlipressin versus noradrenaline in the treatment of hepatorenal syndrome: Systematic review with meta-analysis and full economic evaluation. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 28:345–351
Mahmoud Omar TH, Yoshida EM: Terlipressin and albumin: The good, the bad, and the unattractive (with apologies to Sergio Leone). Can Liver J 2021; 4:340–342
Mohamed MMG, Rauf A, Adam A, et al.: Terlipressin effect on hepatorenal syndrome: Updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JGH Open 2021; 5:896–901
Cavallin M, Piano S, Romano A, et al.: Terlipressin given by continuous intravenous infusion versus intravenous boluses in the treatment of hepatorenal syndrome: A randomized controlled study. Hepatology 2016; 63:983–992

Auteurs

Tyler Pitre (T)

Department of Internal Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Michel Kiflen (M)

Department of Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Wryan Helmeczi (W)

Division of Internal Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Joanna C Dionne (JC)

Department of Medicine (Division of Critical Care), McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Oleksa Rewa (O)

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta and Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

Sean M Bagshaw (SM)

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta and Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

Natalie Needham-Nethercott (N)

Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Department of Critical Care, Grand River Hospital, Kitchener, ON, Canada.

Waleed Alhazzani (W)

Department of Medicine (Division of Critical Care), McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Dena Zeraatkar (D)

Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Department of Bioinformatics, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.

Bram Rochwerg (B)

Department of Medicine (Division of Critical Care), McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH